Türkiye’de İki Farklı Yöntemle Elde Edilmiş Derecelendirme Haritalarının Arazi Toplulaştırma Projelerine Etkisi
Arazi toplulaştırması (AT), gelişen tarımsal teknolojinin ihtiyaçlarına göre toplumun ve bireylerin ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda kırsal alanın yeniden düzenlenmesi ve tarımsal işletmelerin daha verimli çalışması için gerekli önlemlerin alınması olarak tanımlanabilir. Yeniden dağıtım miktarları tarımsal alanların derecelendirilmesine bağlıdır. Türkiye’de AT projeleri iki farklı yasal kurum tarafından gerçekleştirilmektedir ve bu kurumlar derecelendirme haritalarının oluşturulmasında farklı yöntemler kullanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, aynı proje alanında iki farklı yasal kurum için iki farklı yöntemle elde edilen derecelendirme haritalarının etkilerini belirlemek ve değerlendirmektir. Bu çalışmadaki bulgulara göre, her iki yöntemin sonuçları birbirine yakın olarak görülmektedir. İlk olarak, çalışma alanında, 1216 kadastral parsel vardı. 3083 sayılı Kanunun uygulanmasından sonra parsellerin sayısı 35 yeni blokta 614'e düşmüştür. Ayrıca, 5403 sayılı Kanunun uygulanmasından sonra 35 yeni blokta parsel sayısı 749'a düşmüştür. Modeller parsel büyüklükleri açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. İki yönteme göre yeniden dağıtımda, ortalama kareler yöntemine göre farklar yönetmelik hata sınırında belirtilenin altındadır. Bu durum, her iki yöntemin uygulanabilirliğini göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, 3083 sayılı “Sulama Alanlarında Arazi Düzenlemeleri için Tarım Reformu Yasası” ve 5403 sayılı “Toprak Koruma ve Arazi Kullanımı Kanunu” aynı çerçeve altında birleştirilmelidir. Bu durum için yapılacak yeni düzenlemeler uygulayıcıları rahatlatacaktır.
EFFECTS OF THE GRADATION MAPS OBTAINED BY TWO DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE LAND CONSOLIDATION PROJECTS IN TURKEYS
Land consolidation (LC) can be defined as rearranging the rural area in line with the needsof the society and individuals according to the needs of the developing agricultural technology, andtaking all necessary measures to enable agricultural enterprises to work more efficiently. Reallocationquantity depends on the agricultural land valuation. In Turkey, LC projects are performed by differenttwo legal institutions and these institutions use different methods for the production of gradation maps.The purpose of this study was to determine and evaluate effects of different gradation maps obtained bythe two different methods for two different legal institutions for the same project area. According tofinding in this study, the results of both methods are seen as close to each other. First, in the study area,there were 1216 cadastral parcels. The number of the parcels after application of Law 3083 decreased to614 in the 35 new blocks. Furthermore, the number of parcels decreased to 749 in the 35 new blocks afterthe application of Law 5403. Models were compared in terms of parcel sizes. In the reallocationaccording to the two methods, differences according to the average squares are below that specified inthe regulations error limit. This case demonstrates the applicability of both methods. So, law 3083“Agrarian Reform Act for Land Arrangements in Irrigation Areas” and law 5403 “Soil Conservation andLand Use” should be combined under the same framework. New regulations for this case will relaxpractitioners.
___
- Bayrakcı, A. G., Koçar, G., 2012, “Utilization of Renewable Energies in Turkey's Agriculture”, Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16(1), pp. 618–633.
- Blaikie, P. M., Sadeque, A. Z., 2000, “Policy in the High Himalayas: Environment and Development in
the Himalayan Region”, ICIMOD, Kathmandu.
- Cay, T., Uyan, M., 2013, “Evaluation of Reallocation Criteria in Land Consolidation Studies Using the
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 541-548.
- Cay T., Ayten T., Iscan F., 2010, “Effects of Different Land Reallocation Models on the Success of Land
Consolidation Projects: Social and Economic Approaches”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 27(2), pp. 262–
269.
- Chartin, C., Evrard, O., Salvador-Blanes, S., Hinschberger, F., Van Oost, K., Lefevre, I., Daroussin, J.,
Macaire, J. J., 2013, “Quantifying and Modelling the Impact of Land Consolidation and Field
Borders on Soil Redistribution in Agricultural Landscapes (1954-2009)”, Catena, Vol. 110, pp.
184-195.
- Coelho, J. C., Portela, J., Pinto, P. A., 1996, “A Social Approach to Land Consolidation Schemes - A
Portuguese Case Study: The Valenca Project”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 13(2), pp. 129-147.
- Crecente, R., Alvarez, C., Fra, U., 2002, “Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Land
Consolidation in Galicia”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 19(2), pp. 135-147.
- Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., See, L., 2012, “Land Consolidation in Cyprus: Why is an Integrated Planning
and Decision Support System Required?”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 29(1), pp. 131–142.
- Demir, H., Gür, M., Cagdas, V., 2002, “Land Consolidation, Valuation and Cadastre”, FIG XXII
International Congress, Washington, USA, 19-26 April 2002.
- Derlich, F., 2002 “Land Consolidation: A Key for Sustainable Development – French Experience”, FIG
XXII International Congress, Washington, USA, 19-26 April 2002.
- Gonzalez, X. P., Alvarez, C. J., Crecente, R., 2004, “Evaluation of Land Distributions with Joint Regard to
Plot Size and Shape”, Agricultural Systems, Vol. 82, pp. 31-43.
- Ivkovic, M., Barkovic, D., Bacani, S., 2010, “Land Consolidation and Rural Development”, Geodetski List,
Vol. 64(4), pp. 297-312.
- Kirmikil, M., Arici, I., 2013, “The Role of Land Consolidation in the Development of Rural Areas in
Irrigation Areas”, Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, Vol. 11(2), pp. 1150-1155.
- Kizilsu, G., 2002, “Land Consolidation in Rural Areas with Lacis” International Symposium on GIS,
Istanbul-Turkey, 23-26 September 2002.
- Lerman, Z., Cimpoies, D., 2006, “Land Consolidation as a Factor for Rural Development in Moldova”,
Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 58 (3), pp. 439-455.
- Liu, Y. S., Yang, R., Li, Y. H., 2013, “Potential of Land Consolidation of Hollowed Villages under
Different Urbanization Scenarios in China”, Journal of Geographical Sciences, Vol. 23(3), pp. 503-
512.
- Martinez, R., Solla, M., Arias, P., Armesto, J., 2013, “Semi-automatic Land Consolidation Software based
on Geographic Information Systems”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 97, pp. 1-5.
- Mihara, M., 1996, “Effects of Agricultural Land Consolidation on Erosion Processes in Semi-
Mountainous Paddy Fields of Japan”, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Vol. 64 (3),
pp. 237-247.
- Niroula, G. S., Thapa, G. B., 2007, “Impact of Land Fragmentation on Input Use, Crop Yield and
Production Efficiency in the Mountains of Nepal”, Land Degradation and Development, Vol. 18,
pp. 237-248.
- Niroula, G. S., Thapa G. B., 2005, “Impacts and Causes of Land Fragmentation, and Lessons Learned
from Land Consolidation in South Asia”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 22(4), pp. 358–372.
- Pasakarnis, G., Maliene, V., 2010, “Towards Sustainable Rural Development in Central and Eastern
Europe: Applying Land Consolidation”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 545-549.
- Prazan, J., Dumbrovsky, M., 2011, “Soil Conservation Policies: Conditions for Their Effectiveness in the
Czech Republic”, Land Degradation & Development, Vol. 22 (1), pp. 124-133.
- Quadflieg, F., 1997, “An Economist’s View of the Measures Introduced to Accompany the Change in the
Agrarian Structure”, Berichte Uber Landwirtschaft, Vol. 75, pp. 501-514.
- Sklenicka, P., Hladik, J., Strelecek, F., Kottova, B., Lososova, J., Cihal, L., Salek, M., 2009, “Historical,
Environmental and Socio-Economic Driving Forces on Land Ownership Fragmentation, the
Land Consolidation Effect and the Project Costs”, Agricultural Economics-Zemedelska Ekonomika,
Vol. 55(12), pp. 571-582.
- Sklenicka, P., 2006, “Applying Evaluation Criteria for the Land Consolidation Effect to Three
Contrasting Study Areas in the Czech Republic”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 502-510.
- TUIK, 2008, “Tarım İstatistikleri-Sorularla Resmi İstatistikler Dizisi” 5. TÜİK Matbaası, Ankara.
- Uhling, J., 1989, “Land Consolidation Agriculture and Environmental Protection”, Berichte Uber
Landwirtschaft, Vol. 67, pp. 426-456.
- Van Huylenbroeck, G., Coelho, J., Pinto, P.A., 1996, “Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects (LLCs): a
Multidisciplinary Approach”, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 12 (3), pp. 297–310.
- Ulger, N. E., Cay, T., 2012, “An Assessment about Land Consolidation in Turkey”, FIG Working Week,
Rome, Italy.
- Yang, Z.S., Yang, L. F., Zhang, B. S., 2010, “Soil Erosion and Its Basic Characteristics at Karst Rockydesertified
Land Consolidation Area: A Case Study at Muzhe Village of Xichou County in
Southeast Yunnan, China”, Journal of Mountain Science, Vol. 7 (1), pp. 55-72.
- Zhang, Z. F., Zhao, W., 2013, “A Parametric Approach to Assess the Sustainability of Land
Consolidation: A Case Study in Shandong Province, North China”, Agroecology and Sustainable
Food Systems, Vol. 37(4), pp. 444-464.