0.05). VD transplantlarının, devaskülarizasyondan 4 hafta sonra canlılıklarını yeterli kanal açıklığı ile korumuş olmalarından ötürü, "VD transplantasyonu" nun uzun VD kayıplarında yeni tedavi se¬çeneklerinin araştırılmasında kullanılabilecek bir yöntem olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Comparison of two different autotransplantation techniques in repair of vas deferens large defects in rat: Vas deferens versus vein Management of vas deferens (VD) large defects are still controversial. The aim of our study was to compare two different substitution techniques in repair of VD large de¬fects: VD transplantation (VDtr) versus vein interposition (Vtr). Twenty four Wistar-Albino rats were divided into two groups. In group A repair of the established VD de¬fects were performed by VDtr of the left segment on the right and vasovasostomy (VV) on the left side. In group B a VD defect was established on the right side as in group A, and a segment of 1 cm jugular vein was interposed to achive lumen contunity of right VD, while a sham proce¬dure was done on the left. All the rats were sacrified after 4 weeks of recovery period. The specimens were evaluated lumen patency, flow rates and histologic alterations of the VD segments. Testis Biopsy Score Counts were calculated for accurate evaluation of spermatogenesis. All the VD transplants kept their viability, while vein transplants re¬vealed severe degeneration of the wall. Patency of trans¬plants were 66.6 % for VDtr group and there was no pa¬tent Vtr segment. Flow rates were different between the VDtr (0.4-2.4 cc/min) and sham segments (1.3-2.5 cclmin) but were not statistically significant (p>0.05). As all transplanted VD segments were viable with adequate lumen patency after four weeks of devascularization, we concluded that this technique could be used to explore new ways to repair of VD large defects.">
[PDF] Uzun vas deferens (VD) kayıplarının onarımında VD ve ven ototransplantasyon seçeneklerinin sıçan modelinde karşılaştırılması | [PDF] Comparison of two different autotransplantation techniques in repair of vas deferens large defects in rat: Vas deferens versus vein
0.05). VD transplantlarının, devaskülarizasyondan 4 hafta sonra canlılıklarını yeterli kanal açıklığı ile korumuş olmalarından ötürü, "VD transplantasyonu" nun uzun VD kayıplarında yeni tedavi se¬çeneklerinin araştırılmasında kullanılabilecek bir yöntem olduğunu düşünüyoruz.">
0.05). VD transplantlarının, devaskülarizasyondan 4 hafta sonra canlılıklarını yeterli kanal açıklığı ile korumuş olmalarından ötürü, "VD transplantasyonu" nun uzun VD kayıplarında yeni tedavi se¬çeneklerinin araştırılmasında kullanılabilecek bir yöntem olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Comparison of two different autotransplantation techniques in repair of vas deferens large defects in rat: Vas deferens versus vein Management of vas deferens (VD) large defects are still controversial. The aim of our study was to compare two different substitution techniques in repair of VD large de¬fects: VD transplantation (VDtr) versus vein interposition (Vtr). Twenty four Wistar-Albino rats were divided into two groups. In group A repair of the established VD de¬fects were performed by VDtr of the left segment on the right and vasovasostomy (VV) on the left side. In group B a VD defect was established on the right side as in group A, and a segment of 1 cm jugular vein was interposed to achive lumen contunity of right VD, while a sham proce¬dure was done on the left. All the rats were sacrified after 4 weeks of recovery period. The specimens were evaluated lumen patency, flow rates and histologic alterations of the VD segments. Testis Biopsy Score Counts were calculated for accurate evaluation of spermatogenesis. All the VD transplants kept their viability, while vein transplants re¬vealed severe degeneration of the wall. Patency of trans¬plants were 66.6 % for VDtr group and there was no pa¬tent Vtr segment. Flow rates were different between the VDtr (0.4-2.4 cc/min) and sham segments (1.3-2.5 cclmin) but were not statistically significant (p>0.05). As all transplanted VD segments were viable with adequate lumen patency after four weeks of devascularization, we concluded that this technique could be used to explore new ways to repair of VD large defects.">
Ulaşmaya çalıştığınız dergi veri tabanımızda bulunmamaktadır. Detaylı bilgi için lütfen editörle iletişime geçiniz, acarindex@gmail.com