REKABET AVANTAJI YARATMADA TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ TASARIMI: Mc DONALD'S TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Tedarik zinciri yazını incelendiğinde yapılan çalışmaların daha çok pazarlama ve üretim perspektifinden ele alınmakta olduğu, süreçteki problemlerin operasyonel etkinlik boyutuyla incelendiği gözlenmektedir (örn. maliyetlerin veya stok düzeylerinin belirlenmesi, üretim planlarının oluşturulması, bilgi paylaşımında ihtiyaç duyulabilecek yazılımlar veya bilgi paylaşım düzeyleri, vb.). Buna karşın tedarik zincirlerinin ve özellikle tedarik zinciri tasarımının işletme stratejileri açısından önemine sınırlı ve genel düzeyde değinildiği, genel stratejilerle tedarik zinciri tasarımı ilişkisi boyutunun yeterince incelenmediği söylenebilir. Bu noktadan hareketle, ilgili yazından farklı olarak, çalışmamız, rekabet avantajı yaratmada tedarik zinciri tasarımında kilit noktada bulunan boyutlardan hareketle tedarik zinciri tasarımım incelemekte ve stratejik yönetim ve genel olarak yönetim yazınından hareketle tasarımda rekabet avantajı yaratma açısından gelecekte ön plana çıkması beklenen alanlara temas etmektedir. Teorik çerçevede hazırlanan ilk bölümü desteklemek amacıyla özellikle “fast food” sektörü örneği seçilmiştir. Bu amaçla McDonald’s Türkiye’nin tedarik zinciri tasarımının ortaya çıkarılmasına ve bu tasarımın rekabet avantajı sağlaması açısından değerlendirilmesine yönelik örnek olay incelemesi yapılmıştır.

___

  • [1] The Supply Chain Council. (2001). (http//www.supply- chain.org/info/faq.html). [06.03.2001].
  • [2] Lummus, R.R, & Vokurka, R.J. (1999). Defıning Supply Chain Management: A Historical Perspective and Practical Guidelines. İndustrial Management & Data Systems, 99(1), ss.11-17.
  • [3] Quinn, F.J. (1997). What’s the Buzz?. Logistics Management, 32(2), ss.43-47.
  • [4] Council of Logistic Management, (www.clml.org). [06.03.2001], 5
  • [5] Ellram, L., & Cooper M. (1993). Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implications for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy. International Journal of Logistics Management, 4(2), ss. 1-10
  • [6] Monczka, R.M., & Morgan, J. (1997). What’s Wrong with Supply Chain Management?. Purchasing, 122(1), ss.69-73.
  • [7] Drucker, P.F. (1998). Management’s New Paradigms. Forbes, October, ss.152-177.
  • [8] Lambert, D.M., & Cooper, M.C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management, Industrial Marketing Management, 29, ss.65-83.
  • [9] Min, H., & Zhou, G. (2002). Supply Chain Modeling: Past, Present and Future. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43, ss.231-249.
  • [10] Hwang, H. (2002). Design of Supply Chain Logistics System Considering Service Level. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43, ss.283-297.
  • [11] Dor, M.L. (1989). Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Demands: Properties and Solution Framework. Transportation Science, 23, ss. 166-176.
  • [12] Fisher, M.L. (1995). Vehicle Routing Handbooks on Operations Research and Management Science. North-Holland: Anderson.
  • [13] Gendreau, M.L. (1996). Stochastic Vehicle Routing. Europeaıı Journal of Operations Research, 88, ss.3-12.
  • [14] Mintzberg, H. (1998). The Structuring of Organizations. (Ed: Mintzberg, Quinn, & Ghoshal). The Strategy Process. Londra: Prentice Hail.
  • [15] Lowendahl, B., & Revang, O. (1998). Challenges to Existing Strategy Theory in a Postindustrial Society. Strategic Management Journal, 19, ss.755-773.
  • [16] Rich, N., & Hines, P. (1997). Supply Chain Management and Time-Based Competition: The Role of the Supplier Association. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistic, 27(%), ss.210-225.
  • [17] Stevens, G. (1989). Integrating the Supply Chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 19(8), ss.3-8.
  • [18] Franks, J. (2000). Supply Chain Innovation. Work-Study, 49(4), ss.152-155.
  • [19] Ito, K.V, & Rose, E.L. (1994). The Genealogical Structure of Japanese Firms: Parent-Subsidiary Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 15, ss.35-51.
  • [20] Swaminathan, J.M., Smith, S.F., & Sadeh, N.M. (1998). Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach. Decision Sciences, 29(3), ss.607-632.
  • [21] Chandra, C., & Kumar, S. (2000). Supply Chain Management in Theory and Practice: A Passing Fad or Fundamental Change?. industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(3), ss.100-113.
  • [22] Harland, C. (1997). Supply Chain Operational Performance Roles. Integrated Manufacturiııg Systems, 8(2), ss.70-78.
  • [23] Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulman, L.E. (1992). Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, (Mart-Nisan), ss.57-69.
  • [24] Cox, A. (1999). Power, Value and Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(4), ss.167-175.
  • [25] Handfıeld, R.B., & Nicholas, E.L.Jr. (1999). Introduction to Supply Chain Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • [26] Jones, R.M., & Towill, D.R. (1997). Information Enrichment: Designing the Supply Chain for Competitive Advantage. Supply Chain Management, 2(4), ss. 137-148.
  • [27] Davis, M., & O’Sullivan, D. (1999). Systems Design Framevvork for the Extended Enterprise. Production Planning & Coııtrol, 10(1), ss.3-18.
  • [28] Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • [29] Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2001). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • [30] Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., & Roos, D. (1990). Dünyayı Değiştiren Makine. İstanbul: Otomotiv Sanayi Derneği.
  • [31] Choi, B.K., & Kim, B.H. (2002). MES (manufacturing execution system) Architecture for FMS Compatible to ERP (enteıprise planning system). International Journal of Computer Iııtegrated Manufacturing, 15(3), ss.274—284.
  • [32] Wang, T.Y., & Chen, Y.L. (2002). Applying the Network Flow Model to Evaluate an FMC’s Throughput. International Journal of Production Research, 40(3), ss.525-536.
  • [33] Monden, Y. (1981). What makes the Toyota Production System Really Tick? Industrial Engineering, 13(1), ss.36- 46.
  • [34] Schonberger, R.J. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques. New York: MacMillian Press.
  • [35] Ackonberger R.J. (1982). Japanese Manufacturing Techniques: Nine Hidden Lessons in Simplicity. New York: The Free Press.
  • [36] Hail, R.W. (1983). Zero Inventories. Boston: Dow-Jones Irwin.
  • [37] Boardman, J.T., & Clegg, B.T. (2001). Structured Engagement in the Extended Enterprise. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), ss.795-811.
  • [38] Browne, J., & Zhang, J. (1999). Extended and Virtual Enterprises - Similarities and Differences. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 1(1), ss.30-36.
  • [39] O’Neil, H., & Sackett, P. (1994). The Extended Manufacturing Enterprise Paradigm. Management Decision, 32(8), ss.42-49.
  • [40] Nicholas, J.M. (1998). Competitive Manufacturing Management: Continuous Improvement, Lean Production, and Customer-Focused Quality. Boston: McGraw Hill.
  • [41] Petroni, A. (2002). Critical Factors of MRP Implementation in Small and Medium-Sized Firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(3), ss.329-348. [42] Segerstedt, A. (2002). Production and Inventory Control at Abb Motors and Volvo Wheel Loaders, Two Examples of MRP in Practical Use. Production Planning & Control, 13(3), ss.317-325.
  • [43] Chan, F.T.S., Tang, N.K.H., Lau, H.C.W„ & Ip, R.W.L. (2002). A simulation approach in supply chain management. Iııtegrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(2), ss.l 17-122.
  • [44] Takahashi, K., Nakamura, N., & Izumi, M. (1997). Concurrent Ordering in JIT Production Systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(3), ss.267-290.
  • [45] Taylor, M.E. (1997). Beyond MRP - the Operation of a Modem Scheduling System. Supply Chain Management, 2(2), ss.43-48.
  • [46] Al-Mashari, M., & Zairi, M. (2000). The Effective Application of SAP R/3: a proposed model of best practice. Logistics Information Management, 13(3), ss.l56-66.
  • [47] Verville, J., & Halingten, A. (2002). An Investigation of the Decision Process for Selecting an ERP Software: the Case of ESC. Management Decision, 40(3), ss.206-216.
  • [48] Esteves, J., & Pastor, J. (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: an Annotated Bibliography. Communications ofAIS, 7(8), ss.l-52.
  • [49] Petersen, P.B. (2002). The Misplaced Origin of Just-in-Time Production Methods. Management Decision, 40(1), ss.82-88.
  • [50] Svensson, G. (2001). Just-in-Time: The Reincarnation of Past Theory and Practice. Management Decision, 39(10), ss.866-879.
  • [51] Doran, D. (2002). Manufacturing for Synchronous Supply: a Case Study of Ikeda Hoover Ltd. Iııtegrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(1), ss.18-24.
  • [52] Kerrin, M. (2002). Continuous Improvement Along the Supply Chain: the Impact of Customer-Supplier Relations. integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(3), ss.141-149.
  • [53] Baxter, J.E., McKay, A., Agouridas, V., Pennington, A. (2002). Supply Chain Design: An Application of Axiomatic Design. ICAD2002 Second International Conference on Axiomatic Design Cambridge, ss. 115-121.
  • [55] Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a Field of Study: Why Search for a New Paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 15, ss.5-16.
  • [56] Bakoğlu, R. (2000). The Road, the Roadblocks and Diversions on the Way to Today’s Strategy Concept. Öneri, 14(3), ss.101-107.
  • [57] Bakoğlu, R. (2003). Kaynak Bazlı Firma Teorisi Kapsamında Değişen Rekabet Avantajı Kavram ve Anlayışı. I.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), Nisan, ss.65-76.
  • [58] Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2000). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • [59] Porter, M.E. (2000). Rekabet Stratejisi: Sektör ve Rakip Analizi Teknikleri. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • [60] Hines, P., & Rich, N. (1998). Outsourcing Competitive Advantage: The Use of Supplier Associations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics, 28(7), ss.524-546.
  • [61] Shin, H„ Collier, D.A., & Wilson, D.D. (2000). Supply Management Orientation and Supplier/ Buyer Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 18, ss.317-333.
  • [62] Lee, H.L. (2000). Creating Value Trough Supply Chain Integration. Supply Chain Management Review, Eylül- Ekim.
  • [63] Ayers, J.B. (2000). A Premier on Supply-Chain Management. Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal, 16, ss.6-15.
  • [64] Hill, C.W. (2001). International Business: Competing in the Global Market Place. 3rd Ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw- Hill.
  • [65] List of the Fortune 500. (22.03.2004). USA Today. rhttp://www.usatodav.com/monev/companies/2004-03-22- fortune-500-list x.htm). [10.05.2004],
  • [66] Mc Donald’s Basın Dosyası. (2001).
  • [67] Mc Donalds Türkiye Ana Sayfası, http://www.mcdonalds.com.tr/mcdonalds/mcdonalds turkiye.asp. [18.11.2003]
  • [68] Mintzberg, H. (1987). Five Ps For Strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), Sonbahar, ss. 11 -24.
Öneri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0845
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1994
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

DEVLETİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ VE REGÜLASYON TEORİLERİ

Savaş ÇEVİK, Murat DEMİR

MAKROSKOPİK AKIM KARAKTERİSTİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ İÇİN BİR ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME YÖNTEMİ; TRAFİK OPTİMİZASYONU

Necla TEKTAŞ, Ahmet AKBAŞ

THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETVVEEN FOREIGN DIRECT INYESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTHIN TURKEY: COINTEGRATION AND ERROR-CORRECTION MODELSÜRKİYE’DE YABANCI DOĞRUDAN YATIRIM VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ NEDENSEL İLİŞKİ: KOENTEGRESYON VE HATA DÜZELTME MODELLERİ

İhsan GÜNAYDIN

TÜRKİYE’DE İŞGÜVENCESİ YE İŞGÜCÜ PİYASASINA ETKİSİ

İnci KAYHAN KUZGUN

KÜRESELLEŞMENİN DEMOKRATİKLEŞMEYE ETKİLERİ VE TÜRK DEMOKRASİSİ

Abdullah ÖZKAN

ÇOK AMAÇLI DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN ULAŞTIRMA MODELİ VE HEDEF PROGRAMLAMA BÜTÜNLEŞİMİ: SINAVLAR İÇİN GÖZETMENLERİN BELİRLENMESİ

Mustafa M. ÖZKAN

İŞLETMELERİN REKABETİ ALGILAMALARI İLE ÜRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ KULLANIMI İLİŞKİSİ: YENİ NESİL ÜRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ KULLANIMININ REKABET ÜSTÜNLÜĞÜ VE İŞLETME PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ALAN ÇALIŞMASI

Haşan Kürşat GÜLEŞ, M. Atilla ARICIOĞLU

ÖRGÜTLERDE BEDENSEL VE ZİHİNSEL ENGELLİ İŞGÖREN AYRIMCILIĞI: UYGULAMALI ETİK BOYUTUYLA BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Oya AYTEMİZ SEYMEN, Tamer BOLAT

ZAMAN YÖNETİMİ

Bahar Taner BAHAR TANER

DEPREM OLUŞ SIKLIĞININ POISSON DAĞILIMINA UYARLANABİLİRLİĞİ ÜZERİNE BİR DENEME

Hakan YILDIRIM, Ahmad SOURAN