YAPAY ZEKÂ TABANLI SİSTEMLERDEN ÜRETİLEN TEKNOLOJİLERİN ASKERİ HAREKÂTIN SEVK VE İDARESİNDE KULLANILMASINA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Harp teknolojileri, iletişim ve bilişim teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler ve tehdidin mahiyetindeki değişimler, silahlı kuvvetlerin konvansiyonel ve konvansiyonel olmayan mahiyette kuvvet yapılarının değişmesine neden olmuştur. Yaşanan bu değişim ve gelişmeler silahlı kuvvetlerin sevk ve idaresinde her geçen gün daha fazla bilimsel metodun kullanılmasını zorunlu kılmaktadır. Harbin yönetimi, en küçük askeri birlikten, en yüksek seviye askeri teşkile kadar, mahiyet ve ihtiyaç duyduğu bilgi kümesi itibariyle bilimsel yöntemlerle ilişki halindedir. Her yeni teknolojinin sisteme adaptasyonu ve kendisinden etkin bir şekilde istifade edilmesi bir süreç ve çabaya gereksinim gösterir. Bu noktada yapay zekâ tabanlı teknolojilerin silahlı kuvvetlerin sevk ve idare usül ve esaslar sistemeatiğine dahil edilmesi, yapay zekâ tabanlı sistemlerin mevcut muharebe yönetim sitemi ile entegre edilmesi hem teknolojinin edinilmesi, hem de silahlı kuvvetleri sosyal ve yönetim dokusuna uyumlu hale getirilmesi anlamında bir çaba gerektirmektedir. Bu bağlamda yapay zekâ teknolojilerinden esinlenerek askeri karar verme süreçlerine adapte edilen süreçlerle birlikte, cari harekâtın sevk ve idaesiine yönelik olarak kullanılan algoritmalar askeri sevk ve idarenin usül ve esaslarına dair kabullerin değişmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada harbin sevk ve idaresine yönelik olarak bilim ve teknolojilerdeki gelişmelerin etki ve katkıları ortaya koyulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yapay Zekâ, Simülasyon Sistemleri, Askeri Harekât., Askeri Karar Verme Sistemleri

PDF

___

Atkin, M.S. (2003). Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.pp.3
Babak, T.R., Farzad, K. L.J. Luotsinen, L.J. and Gisslén, L. (2017). Evaluating Deep Reinforcement Learning for Computer Generated Forces in Ground Combat Simulation. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). Banff, AB, 2017, pp. 3433-3438, http://doi.org:10.1109/SMC.2017.8123161.
Bentahar, J. (2010). A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence Review 33(3). pp.211–259. http://doi.org:10.1007/s10462-010-9154-1
Bohman, W.E and Staffsim, J. (1999). An Interactive Simulation for Rapid, Real Time Course of Action Analysis by U.S. Army Brigade Staffs, Monterey, CA.pp.36-42
Brehmer, B. (2010). Command and control as design. In Proceedings of the 15th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense CCRP, pp.182.
Brynielsson, J. (2007). Using AI and games for decision support in command and control. Decision Support Systems 43(4):1454–1463. http://doi.org:10.1016/j.2006.06.012
Brynielsson, J. (2009). Development of computerized support tools for intelligence work. In Proceedings of the 14th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense CCRP, pp.48.
Brynielsson, J. (2014). Cyber situational awareness – A systematic review of the literatüre. Computers & Security, Volume 46, pp.18-31. http://doi.org:10.1016/j.cose.2014.06.008
Guerlain, S., Brown, D.E. and Mastrangelo, C. (2010). Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0, Nashville, TN, 2000, pp. 1934-1938 vol.3, http://doi.org:10.1109/ICSMC.2000.886396.
Hayes, C.C. and J.L. Schlabach (2002). FOX-GA: A Planning Support Tool for assisting Military Planners in a Dynamic and Uncertain Environment, AAAI Press.pp.24-32
Jandel, M.(2016). Decision support for releasing anonymised data. Computers & Security, Volume 46, pp.48-61. http://doi.org:10.1016/j.cose.2014.07.001
Johnson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence & future warfare: implications for international security. Defence nd Security Analysis, Volume 35, İsuue 2. pp.147-169. http://doi.org::10.1080/14751798.2019.1600800
Kewley, R. and Embrecht, M. (2002). Computational military tactical planning system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews. pp.161-171.
Klein, Etienne (2014). Dünyayı Değiştiren Fizik Devrimi, Say Yayınları, İstanbul.
Lei, L., Tan,Y., Zheng, K., Liu,S., Zhang, K. and Shen, X. (2020). "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Internet of Things: Model, Applications and Challenges," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1722-1760. http://doi.org:10.1109/COMST.2020.2988367.
Lent, M., Fisher, W. and Mancuso, M. (2004). An explainable artificial intelligence system for small-unit tactical behavior. Proceedings of the 16th conference on Innovative applications of artifical intelligence, pp. 900– 907.
Marr, J. (2001). The Military Decision Making Process: Making Better Decisions Versus Making Decision Better, Fort Leavenworth, KS. pp.12
Moradi, F. and Schubert, J. (2014). Simulation-based defense planning In Proceedings of the NATO Symposium on Integrating Modelling & Simulation in the Defence Acquisition Lifecycle and Military Training Curriculum (MSG-126), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1−16.
Paparone, C.R. (2001). US Army Decision-making: Past, Present and Future, Military Review. US Army CGSC, pp.45.
Prelipcean, G. and Boscoianu M. (2008). Computational framework for assessing decisions in energy investments based on a mix between real options analysis and artificial neural networks, in Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematics & Computers in Business and Economics (MCBE’80), pp. 179-184
Prelipcean, G. and Moisescu, F. (2011). Efficient Decision Support Systems-Practice and Challenges in Multidisciplinary Domains. IntechOpen. p. 359-376
Rogers, E. (2010).Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press. University of Michigan, USA. pp.234
Schubert, J., Brynielsson, J., Nilsson, M. and Svenmarck, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence for decision support in command and control systems in Proceedings of the 23rd International Command and Control Research & Technology Symposium, Pensacola. Washington, DC, 2018, pp.30.
Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., Chen, Y., Lillicrap, T., Hui, F., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Graepel, T. and Hassabis, D. (2017). Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature 550:354–359. http://doi.org:10.1038/nature24270
Svenmarck, P., Luotsinen, L., Nilsson, M. and Schubert, J. (2018). Possibilities and challenges for artificial intelligence in military applications In Proceedings of the NATO Big Data and Artificial Intelligence for Military Decision Making Specialists' Meeting (IST-160), Bordeaux, France, NATO Research and Technology Organisation, pp. 1−16.
Şengöz, M. (2019a) Yönetim Felsefesi: Gazi Paşa’nın Perspektifinden Aksiyolojik Liderlik Üzerine Mülahazalar. Ankara: Astana Yayınları.s.65-73
Şengöz, M. (2019b). Leadership Challenges in the Current Security Environment, Ankara: Astana Yayınları.s.11.
Şengöz, M. (2020). The Framework of Military Leadership, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.pp.9-15
Turner, P. and Dodd, L. (2016). Developing the cognitive and social aspects of military ‘understanding capability’. In Proceedings of the 21st International Command and Control Research Technology Symposium. Washington, DC: International Command and Control Institute, pp. 69.