Sex differentials in students' achievement and interest in geometry using games and simulations technique

This study investigated the effect of games and simulations on the gender related differences in mathematics achievement and interest of students in geometry. The sample group consisted of 287 senior secondary school (SSS I) students comprising 158 boys and 129 girls from six out of the 46 secondary schools in Gwer-West LGA of Benue state, Nigeria. The study adopted a pre-test and post-test quasi-experimental design, where intact classes were assigned to experimental and control groups. Data generated using Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) and Geometry Interest Inventory (GII) were analyzed using descriptive statistics to answer research questions and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to test the hypotheses. Findings reveal that male and female students taught using games, and simulations did not differ significantly both in achievement and in interest. It was recommended among others that mathematics teacher should always use relevant games and simulations in teaching mathematics concepts but paying equal attention to the learning needs of both male and female students, and that school administrators should be encouraged to provide local games that could facilitate meaningful learning of mathematics.

PDF

___

Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1996). Etkili öğrenme ve öğretme. (3. baskı). Kanyılmaz Matbaası, İzmir.
Akdeniz, A. R. (2005). Problem çözme, bilimsel süreç ve proje yönteminin fen eğitiminde kullanımı, Çepni, S. (Ed.) Kuramdan Uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi, Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Altun, M. (2000). İlköğretimde problem çözme öğretimi. Milli Eğitim, 147.
Azuma, T. & Nagao, K. (2008). An inquiry into the reproduction of physics-phobic children by physics-phobic teachers. arXiv:0803.3167v2 [physics.ed-ph], Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3167
Benckert, S. (1997). Context and conversation in physics education. Retrieved from http://www.nshu.se/download/3018/benckert_sylvia_97.pdf
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Üçüncü Baskı, Celepler Matbaacılık, Trabzon.
Glynn, S. & Koballa, T. R. (2005). The contextual teaching and learning instructional approach. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Exemplary Science: Best Practices In Professional Development (Pp. 75–84). Arlington, Va: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Güzel, H. (2004). Genel fizik ve matematik derslerindeki başarı ile matematiğe karşı olan tutum arasındaki ilişki. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 1 (1), 49-58.
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60, 637–644.
Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education. 22, 1–41.
Hoffmann, L., Hausler, P. & Lehrke, M. (1998). Die IPN-Interessenstudie Physik. Kiel: IPN.
Merriam S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Murphy, P. (1994). Gender differences in pupils’ reactions to practical work. Teaching Science, Ed R Levinson (London: Routledge).
Park, J. & Lee, L. (2004). Analyzing cognitive and non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in an everyday context. International Journal Of Science Education, 29, 1577–1595.
Rennie, L. J. & Parker, L. H. (1996). Placing physics problems in real-life context: students' reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42 (1).
Sharma, B. K. (2004). Can we make physics popular? Proceeding of Second Annual Conference and National Conference On “How To Make Physics Popular?”, Jaipur, India, 11-13.
Shiu-sing, T. (2005). Some reflections on the design of contextual learning and teaching materials. Retrieved from Contextual Physics in Ocean Park http://resources.emb.gov.hk/cphysics
Taasoobshirazi, G & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3 (2), 155-167.
Van De Walle John A. (1994). Elementary school mathematics. Virginia Commenralth University, Longman.
Whitelegg, E., & Parry, M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: meanings, issues, and practice. Physics Education, 34, 68–72.
Yam, H. (2005). What is contextual learning and teaching in physics? Retrieved from http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/contextual/approach/tem/brief_e.html.
Yaman, M., Dervişoğlu, S. & Soran, H. (2004). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin derslere ilgilerinin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 232-240.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research design and methods. Second Edition, Sage Publications, California.