Farklı solarizasyon uygulamalarının marulun (Lactuca sativa L. Duna) mineral beslenmesi üzerine etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amaç, farklı solarizasyon malç malzemeleri ve biochar uygulamasının marul bitkisinin mineral beslenmesine etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

Effect of different solarization treatments on mineral nutrition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. Duna)

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different solarization mulch materials and biochar application on the mineral nutrition of lettuce plant.Methods and Results: The study was carried out with 2 different solarization mulches and biochar applications for 2 years in greenhouse conditions. Lettuce was grown in each plot after solarization. At the end of the harvest period, the dry weight values of the harvested plants and some nutrient concentrations were determined, in addition, the amounts of elements exploited by plants from the soil were calculated. According to the results; it was determined that the most effective applications on plant’s dry weight for both years were found when solarization and biochar were used together. In addition, it was determined that the least effective applications were found as control treatments and classical solarization treatment.Conclusions: It was determined that the most effective applications on the nutrients removed from the soil were; bubble solarization + biochar and solarization + biochar applications, while the least ineffective applications were control and classical solarization applications.Significance and Impact of the Study: According to the values obtained from the classical solarization mulch material, it was concluded that bubble solarization mulch material and solarization applications with biochar added were more effective in terms of lettuce mineral nutrition. According to the results of this study, a more effective cultivation would be possible with the help of biochar additive in solarization applications.

___

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere, 99: 19-33.
  • Alaboz P, Öz H (2020) Biyokömür ve solarizasyon uygulamalarının bazı toprak fiziksel özellikler üzerine etkileri, Anadolu Tar. Bil. Derg., 35: 208-214.
  • Al-Shammary AAG, Al-Sadoon JNA, Lahmod NR (2016) Influence of the soil solarization management and fertilizer on soil temperature under different soil tillage systems. J. Agric. Sci., 8, 98.
  • Al-Shammary AAG, Kouzani A, Gyasi-Agyei Y, Gates W, Rodrigo-Comino J (2020) Effects of solarisation on soil thermal-physical properties under different soil treatments: A review, Geoderma, 363: 1-17.
  • Campiglia E, Temperini O, Mancinelli R, Saccardo F (2000) Effects of soil solarization on the weed control of vegetable crops and on the cauliflower and fennel production in the open field. Acta Hortic., 533, 249–255.
  • D’Addabbo T, Miccolis V, Basile M, Candido V (2010) Soil solarization and sustainable agriculture. ın: lichtfouse, e. (Ed.), Sociology, Organic Farming, Climate Change and Soil Science. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 217–274.
  • Durukan H, Saraç H, Demirbaş A (2020) Farklı dozlarda vermikompost uygulamasının mısır bitkisinin verimine ve besin elementleri alımına etkisi. ISUBU Zir. Fak. Derg., 45-51.
  • Granados MR, Bonachela S, Hernandez J, Lopez JC, Magan JJ, Baeza EJ, Gazguez JC, Perez-Parra JJ (2012) Soil temperatures in a mediterrannean greenhouse with different solarization strategies. Acta Hortic., 927, 747–753.
  • Grunzweig JM, Katan J, Ben-Tal Y, Rabinowitch HD (1999) The role of mineral nutrients in the increased growth response of tomato plants in solarized soil. Plant Soil, 206, 21–27.
  • Hartz TK, Johnstone PR, Williams E, Smith RF (2007) Establishing lettuce leaf nutrient optimum ranges through DRIS analysis. HortScience, 42(1): 143-146.
  • Hochmuth G, Maynard D. Vavrina C, Hanlon E (1991) Plant Tissue Analysis and Interpretation for Vegetable Crops in Florida Univ. Florida Special Publication SS-VEC42.
  • Jones JB, Wolf B, Mills HA (1992) Plant Analysis Handbook. A Practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc.
  • Komariah K, Ito K, Onishi T, Senge M (2011) Soil properties affected by combinations of soil solarization and organic amendment. Paddy Water Environ., 9, 357–366.
  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1969) Development of a DTPA micronutrient soil test. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proceed. 35: 600-602.
  • Ludwick AE (2002) Western Fertilizer Handbook. 9th ed. Interstate Publishers, Inc., Danville.
  • Mills HA, Benton J (1996) Plant analysis handbook II: A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. No. 581.13 M657.
  • Morra L, Carrieri R, Fornasier F, Mormile P, Rippa M, Baiano S, Cermola M, Piccirillo G, Lahoz E (2018) Solarization working like a “solar hot panel” after compost addition sanitizes soil in thirty days and preserves soil fertility. Appl. Soil Ecol. 126, 65–74.
  • Mudalagiriyappa M, Nanjappa HV, Ramachandrappa BK (1999) Effect of soil solarization on weed growth and yield of Kharif groundnut. Indian J. Agron., 44 (2): 396–399.
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanable FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. U. S. Dept. of Agric. Cir. 939, Washington D. C.
  • Öz H, Coşkan A, Atılgan A (2016) Effect of different plastic cover materials and biofumigation to soil organic matter decomposition in greenhouse solarization. Sci. Pap. Ser. A. Agronomy, Vol. LIX, 127-129.
  • Öz H, Coşkan A, Atılgan A (2017a) Air bubbled or water filled bubbled solarization sheet was further effective on number of soil microorganisms, CO2 production as well as microbial biomass carbon, Sci. Pap. Ser. A. Agronomy, Vol. LX, 137-141.
  • Öz H, Coskan A, Atilgan A (2017b) Determination of effects of various plastic covers and biofumigation on soil temperature and soil nitrogen form in greenhouse solarization: new solarization cover material. J. Polym. Environ., 25(2): 370–377.
  • Öz H (2018) A new approach to soil solarization: Addition of biochar to the effect of soil temperature and quality and yield parameters of lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L. Duna). Sci. Hortic. 228:153–161.
  • Öz H, Yaylacı C, Erdal İ (2021) Farklı malç materyallerinin marul (Lactuca sativa L. Duna) bitkisinin gelişimi ve bazı mineral besin elementleri üzerine etkisi. MKU. Tar. Bil. Derg., 26(2): 489-496.
  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Soil Sci., 78: 2.
  • Stapleton JJ (2000) Soil solarization in various agricultural production systems. Crop Prot. 19, 837–841.
  • Üçok Z, Demir H, Sönmez İ, Polat E (2019) Farklı organik gübre uygulamalarının kıvırcık salatada (Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa) verim, kalite ve bitki besin elementi içeriklerine etkileri. Medit. Agric. Sci., 32: 63-68.
  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37(1): 29-38.
  • Yağmur B, Aydın Ş (2021) Çinko (Zn) uygulamalarının marul (Lactuca Sativa L.) bitkisinin bazı yaprak besin element içeriklerine etkisi. Top. Bil. Bit. Besl. Derg., 9(1): 57-63.
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Azot ve bor gübrelemesinin kırmızı pancarın depolama sürecinde besin elementi konsantrasyonlarına etkisi

Selen AKAN, Mehmet Burak TAŞKIN, Özge HORZUM, Hanife AKÇA

Su stresinin azaltılmasında yapraktan bor uygulamalarının kayısı ağaçlarında verim ve meyve kalitesi üzerine etkileri

Berkant ÖDEMİŞ, Sultan UNCU

Sağlıklı muz ağaçlarından endofit bakteri izolatlarının izolasyonu ve taç çürüklüğü hastalığı etmeni Fusarium verticillioides’e karşı antagonistik etkinliklerinin in vitro koşullarda belirlenmesi

Merve KARA, Soner SOYLU

Sıvı solucan gübresinin tuz stresi altında Macar Fiğ (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) tohumlarının çimlenmesi ve fide gelişimi üzerine iyileştirici etkisinin belirlenmesi

Ali Mohammed Abed Mustafa MUSTAFA, Nuray ÇİÇEK, Cengiz YÜCEDAĞ, Seçil AKILLI SİMSEK

Bazı arpa genotiplerinin tuzlu koşullarda çimlenme tepkilerinin değerlendirilmesi

Berk BENLİOĞLU, Uğur ÖZKAN, Güray AKDOGAN

Farklı yetiştiricilik uygulamalarının tarla ve sera koşullarında yetiştiriciliği yapılan safran (Crocus sativus L.) korm verimi ve özellikleri üzerine olan etkileri

Hasan ASİL, Selim TAŞGIN, Murat ÇELİK, Fatma ÇELİK

Topraksız kültürde yetiştirilen ‘Sabrina’ çilek çeşidinin kış mevsiminde kalite parametrelerindeki değişimler

Ahmet Erhan ÖZDEMİR, Derya KILIÇ, Özge DEMİRKESER, Fevci ÇULHA, Zafer KARAŞAHİN

Kentsel alanda kullanılan zemin malzemelerinden kaynaklanan yüzey sıcaklığı artışının önlenmesinde ağaçların etkisinin belirlenmesi

Fatih ADIGÜZEL, Elif BOZDOĞAN SERT, Mehmet ÇETİN

Kilis bölgesinde satılan peynirlerden izole edilen laktik asit bakterilerinin probiyotik ve bazı teknolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

Hidayet SAĞLAM, Filiz UÇAN TÜRKMEN

Kadmiyum (CdCl2) stresi altında farklı kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotiplerinin çimlenme ve ilk fide gelişimi

Yusuf Ziya AYGÜN, İbrahim ATIŞ, İbrahim ERTEKİN