İlaçlama işleminde GNSS esaslı traktör otomatik dümenleme sistemlerinin etkinliği

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, traktör otomatik dümenleme (OD) sistemi ile ve manuel dümenleme ile yapılan ilaçlamada yan yana paralel geçişlerdeki örtüşme ve boşluk miktarları karşılaştırılmıştır. Yöntemler ve Bulgular: Veriler, OD sistemlerinin gerçek çiftçi koşullarındaki performansını değerlendirmek için 13 çiftçi tarlasından (pamuk, mısır ve yerfıstığı) elde edilmiştir. İlaçlama sırasında traktörün izlediği noktaların koordinatları kayıt altına alınmış, bu noktalardan oluşturulan haritalar üzerinden ortalama örtüşme ve boşluk hata değerleri (Hataların ortalama kare kökü; Root mean square error: RMSE) belirlenmiş ve analiz edilmiştir. Tarlalar arasındaki değişkenlik de incelenmiştir. RMSE değerinin çiftçilerin sırta toprak işleme, ekim ve ilaçlama işlemlerinin her üçünde ODkullandığı (RTK düzeltme sinyaliyle) tarlalarda en düşük değerde (7.5 ± 1.7 cm) olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Çiftçilerin sadece sırta toprak işlemeyi OD sistemiyle, ekim ve ilaçlamayı manuel olarak (OD kullanmadan) yaptığı tarlalarda ortalama hata değerinin daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir (CORS-GSM: 46.1 ± 6.5 cm, SBAS: 76.5 ± 13.9 cm). Sırta toprak işleme, ekim ve ilaçlamanın hepsinin manuel dümenleme ile yapıldığı tarlalarda ise ortalama hata değerinin en yüksek düzeyde olduğu (100.8 ± 27.8 cm) görülmüştür (p

Effectiveness of GNSS-based tractor auto steering systems in crop spraying

Aims: This study aimed to compare pass-to-pass overlaps and spacings inadjacent parallel passes in spraying with and without tractor automaticsteering (AS).Methods and Results: The data were obtained from 13 farmer fields(cotton, corn and peanut) to assess the performance of AS systems in realfarmer conditions. Root mean square errors (RMSE) of overlaps andspacings were determined on the maps generated from the coordinates ofthe tractor recorded while spraying. Variations between the fields werealso examined. The RMSE was lowest (7.5 ± 1.7 cm) in the fields on whichfarmers used AS (with RTK correction signal) in all three operations oftillage, sowing and spraying. RMSE values were comparatively higher forthe fields on which farmers used AS only in ridge tillage but not in sowingand spraying (CORS-GSM: 46.1 ± 6.5 cm, SBAS: 76.5 ± 13.9 cm). The fieldswith manually-steered ridge tillage, sowing and spraying (all three) had thehighest RMSE value of 100.8 ± 27.8 cm (p

___

  • Akdemir B (2016) Evaluation of precision farming research and applications in Turkey. 10.7251/AGRENG1607227. pp.1498-1504.
  • Altinkaradag A (2014) Development of Automatic Steering System for Tractors. PhD Dissertation. Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey. 135 pp.
  • Ashworth AJ, Lindsay KR, Popp MP, Owens PR (2018) Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Tractor Guidance Tech. Agric. & Envir. Letters. 5pp.
  • Baillie CP, Lobsey CR, Diogenes LA, McCarthy CL, Thomasson JA (2018) A review of the state of the art in agricultural automation. Part III: Agricultural machinery navigation systems. ASABE Annual International Meeting, 29 July - 1 August 2018, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Bayar G, Bergerman M, Koku AB, Konukseven EI (2015) Localization and control of an autonomous orchard vehicle. Comput. Electron. Agric. 115: 118–128.
  • Buick R, Lange AF (1998) Assessing Efficiency of Agricultural Chemical Application with Differential GPS, ArcView and Spatial Analyst. Precis. Agric. P.C. Robert, R.H. Rust and W.E. Larson (Ed.). p. 1035-1045.
  • Buick R, White E (1999) Comparing GPS Guidance with Foam Marker Guidance. Fourth International Conference on Precision Agriculture. pp.1035-1045.
  • Erickson B, Widmar DA (2015) Precision agricultural services dealership survey results. Purdue University. West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 37pp.
  • Evrenesoglu M, Karatas U (2019) The Effect of Automatic Steering on Agro-Technical Success in Deep Chisels. 32nd National Agric. Mech. and Energy Congress, 4-6 September 2019, Canakkale, Turkey. pp 10-11.
  • Gisgeography (2018) How to Calculate Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Excel. https://gisgeography.com/root-mean-square-errorrmse-gis (Accessed on: 30.12.2018)
  • Grisso R, Alley M, Groover G (2009) Precision Farming Tools: GPS Navigation. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Publication No 442-501. 7 pp.
  • Hudson G, Shofner R, Wardlow G, Johnson D (2007) Evaluation of three tractor-guidance methods for parallel swathing at two field speeds. Discovery, 8:61- 66.
  • Keskin M, Görücü Keskin S (2012) Precision Agriculture Technologies (Hassas Tarım Tek.). Book (In Turkish). Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey. No: 35. 212 pp.
  • Keskin M (2013) Factors Affecting the Adoption of the Precision Agric. Technologies and the Adoption Rate of these Technologies in the World (In Turkish with Abstract in English). J. Agric. Mach. Sci. 9(4): 263-272.
  • Keskin M, Sekerli YE (2016) Awareness and adoption of precision agriculture in the Cukurova region of Turkey. Agron.Res. 14(4): 1307-1320.
  • Keskin M, Sekerli YE, Say SM, Topcueri M (2018) Farmers’ Experiences with GNSS-Based Tractor Auto Guidance in Adana Province of Turkey. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ. 35(2):172-181.
  • Kunz C, Weber JF, Peteinatos GG, Sökefeld M, Gerhards R (2018) Camera steered mechanical weed control in sugar beet, maize and soybean. Precis. Agric. 19: 708–720
  • Leonard E (2014) Precision Agriculture Down Under. www.precisionag.com/guidance/precision-ag-downunder.
  • Li M, Imou K, Wakabayashi K, Yokoyama S (2009) Review of research on agricultural vehicle autonomous guidance. J. Agric. & Biol. Eng. 2(3):1-26.
  • Lowenberg-DeBoer J (1999) GPS Based Guidance Systems for Agriculture. 6 December 1999.
  • McDougall K, Gibbings P, Wolski I (2001) Comparison of a d-GPS system and conventional guidance for spraying applications. In: 5th Precis. Agric. in Australasia Symp: Information for Better Production and Envir Manag., 17-19 Jul 2001, Sydney, Australia.
  • Molin JP, Cerri DGP, Baio FHR, Torrezan HF, Esquerdo JCDM, Ripoli MLC (2002) Evaluation of a light bar for parallel swathing under different forward speeds. World Congress of Computers in Agr. and Natural Resources. 13 March 2002. Iguacu Falls, Brazil: ASABE.
  • Morgan M, Ess D (2003) The precision farming guide for agriculturists. Second edition. John Deere Publishing, Moline, Illinois, USA.
  • Morrow TF (2002) Evaluation of DGPS Row Guidance Systems, Analyzing Operator Feedback Methods Based on Accuracy and Operator Insights. MSc Thesis, Univ of Tennessee. 93 pp.
  • Mousazadeh H (2013) A technical review on navigation systems of agricultural autonomous off-road vehicles. J. Terramech. 50: 211–232.
  • Müller Elektronik (2018) Steering systems & GPS. Brochure. 12pp. www.mueller-elektronik.de
  • Norwood S, Fulton J (2009) GPS/GIS Applications for Farming Systems. Alabama Farmers Federation Commodity Organizational Meeting. 5 February 2009.
  • Reichhardt (2012). Auto Guidance System Brochure. Reichhardt, 12 First Street Southi Sabin, MN 56580. www.reichhardt.com.
  • Reid JF, Zhang Q, Noguchi N, Dickson M (2000) Agricultural automatic guidance research in North America. Comput. Electron. Agric. 25: 155–167.
  • Santos AF, Silva RP, Tavares TO, Ormond ATS, Rosalen DL, Assis LC (2017) Parallelism error in peanut sowing operation with auto-steer guidance. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 21(10):731-736.
  • Santos AF, Correa LN, Gírio LAS, Paixao CSS, da Silva RP (2018) Position Errors in Sowing in Curved and Rectilinear Routes Using Autopilot. Eng. Agríc. 38: 568-576.
  • Say SM, Keskin M, Sehri M, Sekerli YE (2017) Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies in Developed and Developing Countries. International Science and Technology Conference, 17-19 July 2017 Berlin, Germany. pp.41-49.
  • Silva CB, Moraes MAF, Molin JP (2011) Adoption and use of precis. agric. tech. in the sugarcane industry of Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Precis. Agric. 12: 67–81.
  • Torres FP, Ribeiro Filho AC, Baio FHR (2000) Comparaçao da utilizaçao da barra de luz na agricultura de precisao em relaçao ao marcador de espuma. In: Agric. de Precisao. Viçaso: UFV. 357-364.
  • USDA (2015a) Agricultural Resource Management Survey: US Peanut Industry. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agric Stat Service (NASS). No 2015-1. 4 pp.
  • USDA (2015b) Agricultural Resource Management Survey: US Rice Industry. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agric Stat Service (NASS). No 2015-2. 4 pp.
  • Unal I, Topakci M (2012) Navigation Methodology and Different Navigation Systems for Agricultural Applications (In Turkish with Abstract in English). 27. National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, 5-7 September 2012, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Verma L (2015) China Pursues Precision Agriculture on a Grand Scale. Resource Magazine. July/August 2015. 22: 18–19.
  • Whelan B, Taylor J (2013) Precision agriculture for grain production systems. Csiro Publishing. 199 pp.
Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi tarım bilimleri dergisi (online)-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-9362
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Ortalama sıcaklık verisinde gidişlerin belirlenmesi: Antalya ve Alanya örneği

Mete ÖZFİDANER, Duygu ŞAPOLYO UÇAN, Fatih TOPALOĞLU

Ana ürün, buğday + II. ürün yerfıstığında farklı toprak işleme yöntemlerinin meyve verimi, yakıt tüketimi ve ekonomik yönden karşılaştırılması

Çiğdem BOYDAK, Orhan KARA

Response of okra to water stress

Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Bilal CEMEK

Sulama suyundaki farklı bor düzeylerinin pamuğun (Gossypium hirsutum L.) gelişimine etkisi

İbrahim Halil ÇEVİK, Ali Fuat TARI

Çukurova koşullarında yüzeyüstü ve yüzeyaltı damla sulama yöntemiyle farklı su düzeylerinde sulanan patlıcan bitkisinin azot kullanım randımanının belirlenmesi

Engin GÖNEN, Çağatay TANRIVERDİ, Yeşim BOZKURT ÇOLAK, Attila (ve diğerleri) Yazar, Mete ÖZFİDANER

Doğu Antalya bölgesinde bulunan ilçelerde meydana gelen doğal afetlerden zarar gören seralarin ve sigorta durumlarinin belirlenmesi

Cihan KARACA, Ahmet TEZCAN, Kenan BÜYÜKTAŞ, Rabia ÇALIŞKAN

The use of universal kriging interpolation technique to determine groundwater levels in dry and wet years: A case study in a semi-arid region of Mahdia in Tunisia

Rania SOULA, Ali CHEBIL, Mahmut CETIN, Rajouene MAJDOUB

Domates ve biber rizosfer topraklarında kalsiyum (Ca) uygulamalarının R/S değerlerine etkisi

Kemal DOGAN, Sefer BOZKURT, Necat AGCA

Comparison of two lateral move irrigation machines commonly used in Turkey in respect of water uniformity coefficient

Hüseyin T. GÜLTAŞ, Yeşim AHİ, Daniyal D. KÖKSAL, Murat KARAER

Kabak bitkisi (Cucurpita pepo L.) ekiminde uygulanan farklı oranlarda azotun bitki gelişimine, verimine, su tüketimine ve su kullanımına etkisi

Ali ÜNLÜKARA, Nihat DUMANLAR, Adem GÜNEŞ