Fournier’s Gangrene: Our Clinical Experience and Outcomes

Objective: We aimed to present our results and experience related to patients followed with Fournier’s gangrene.Methods: Patient data were retrospectively obtained from patient records. Data from 10 patients attending Ordu University Education-Research Hospital Urology clinic with diagnosis of Fournier’s gangrene from April 2017 to April 2021 were used. Cases developing after surgery, with compression wounds, and related to radiotherapy were excluded. Information like patient history, demographic features, comorbid diseases, physical examination findings and treatment outcomes were recorded.Results: The study included outcomes for 10 patients. Mean age was identified as 71.50±9.09 (51-78) years. All of our patients were male, with no female patient among our cases. Mean body weight of patients was 80.40±1.81 (78-83) kg. When patients are assessed in terms of substance use, 60% of patients smoked and 10% drank alcohol. The mean total number of medications used due to comorbid diseases was 1.8 (0-6). The mean ASA score for patients was 2.20±0.42. In terms of initial location, 6 patients had lesions in the scrotum (60%), 1 on the penis (10%) and 3 in the perineal region (30%). The mean duration until surgery was 8.71±4.95 (3-17) days, with mean number of surgeries after diagnosis 1.67±0.81 (1-3), and mean dressing duration 22.14±5.30 (15-30) days (Table 1). Pathology results for one patient identified squamous cell cancer (10%).Conclusion: In spite of all developments, Fournier’s gangrene is still an emergency situation associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. In clinics experienced with this disease, it may be treated close to perfectly with high success rates and low complication rates. We believe the most important points for treatment are early diagnosis, effective.

Fournier’s Gangrene: Our Clinical Experience and Outcomes

Objective: We aimed to present our results and experience related to patients followed with Fournier’s gangrene.Methods: Patient data were retrospectively obtained from patient records. Data from 10 patients attending Ordu University Education-Research Hospital Urology clinic with diagnosis of Fournier’s gangrene from April 2017 to April 2021 were used. Cases developing after surgery, with compression wounds, and related to radiotherapy were excluded. Information like patient history, demographic features, comorbid diseases, physical examination findings and treatment outcomes were recorded. Results: The study included outcomes for 10 patients. Mean age was identified as 71.50±9.09 (51-78) years. All of our patients were male, with no female patient among our cases. Mean body weight of patients was 80.40±1.81 (78-83) kg. When patients are assessed in terms of substance use, 60% of patients smoked and 10% drank alcohol. The mean total number of medications used due to comorbid diseases was 1.8 (0-6). The mean ASA score for patients was 2.20±0.42. In terms of initial location, 6 patients had lesions in the scrotum (60%), 1 on the penis (10%) and 3 in the perineal region (30%). The mean duration until surgery was 8.71±4.95 (3-17) days, with mean number of surgeries after diagnosis 1.67±0.81 (1-3), and mean dressing duration 22.14±5.30 (15-30) days (Table 1). Pathology results for one patient identified squamous cell cancer (10%).Conclusion: In spite of all developments, Fournier’s gangrene is still an emergency situation associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. In clinics experienced with this disease, it may be treated close to perfectly with high success rates and low complication rates. We believe the most important points for treatment are early diagnosis, effective.

___

  • 1. Grzybowski A. A short history of Fournier gangrene. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(2):182.
  • 2. Sallami S, Maalla R, Gammoudi A, Ben Jdidia G, Tarhouni L, Horchani A. Fournier's gangrene: what are the prognostic factors? Our experience with 40 patients. Tunis Med. 2012;90(10):708-14.
  • 3. Thwaini A, Khan A, Malik A, Cherian J, Barua J, Shergill I, Mammen K. Fournier's gangrene and its emergency management. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(970):516-9.
  • 4. Eke N. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg. 2000;87(6):718-28.
  • 5. Çalışkan S, Özsoy E, Sungur M, Gözdaş HT. Fournier's gangrene: Review of 36 cases. Ulus Journal of Trauma Emergency Surgery 2019;25(5):479-483.
  • 6. Singh A, Ahmed K, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Fournier's gangrene. A clinical review. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88(3):157-164.
  • 7. Taviloglu K, Cabioglu N, Cagatay A, Yanar H, Ertekin C, Baspinar I, Ozsut H, Guloglu R. Idiopathic necrotizing fasciitis: risk factors and strategies for management. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):315-20.
  • 8. Korkut M, Icoz G, Dayangac M, Akgun E, Yeniay L, Erdogan O, Cal C. Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier's gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(5):649-52.
  • 9. Kamper L, Piroth W, Haage P. Fournier-Gangrän mit letalem Verlauf bei einer Patientin mit Diabetes mellitus [Fournier gangrene (necrotizing fasciitis) in a woman with diabetes mellitus]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Aug;134(33):1625-8. German.
  • 10. Fajdic J, Gotovac N, Hrgovic Z. Fournier gangrene: our approach and patients. Urol Int. 2011;87(2):186-91.
  • 11. Malik AM, Sheikh S, Pathan R, Khan A, Sheikh U. The spectrum of presentation and management of Fournier's gangrene--an experience of 73 cases. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(8):617-9.
  • 12. Korhonen K, Hirn M, Niinikoski J. Hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of Fournier's gangrene. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(4):251-5.
  • 13. Mindrup SR, Kealey GP, Fallon B. Hyperbaric oxygen for the treatment of fournier's gangrene. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1975-7.
  • 14. Chernyadyev SA, Ufimtseva MA, Vishnevskaya IF, Bochkarev YM, Ushakov AA, Beresneva TA, Galimzyanov FV, Khodakov VV. Fournier's Gangrene: Literature Review and Clinical Cases. Urol Int. 2018;101(1):91-97.
Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Ordu Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Role of Hypericum Perforatum (St. John's Wort Oil) and Olive Oil in the Prevention of Peritoneal Adhesion in a Rat Model: An Animal Study

Tuğrul KESİCİOĞLU, İsmail AYDIN, Selahattin VURAL, İlkay ÇİNAR, Mehmet GÜLMEZ, Arif KESKİN

Perceived job stress and COVID- 19 pandemic related stress predictors among Nurses working in Saudi Arabia

Shylaja J, Huda MOHAMMED TALEA ASİRİ, Nouf MOHAMMED AHMAED AL MAKTHER, Alaa AHMAD ALSAYED, Hind ALI AYED ALHBIRY ASIRI, Fathima ALİ MOHAMMED AQİLİ, Amal HABIB MOHAMMED ALAMMARI

Analysis of Forensic Geriatric Patients Admitted to Emergency Department

Meltem KÖKDENER, Latif DURAN, İskender AKSOY, Mehmet EKİZ

Comparative Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue and Corrosion Resistance of Three Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments

Elif Bahar ÇAKICI, Kezban Meltem ÇOLAK

Estimating Height and Body Weight Using Foot Measurements

Emrah ALTUNTAŞ, Ahmet UZUN

Laboratory Parameters and Clinical Courses in Covid-19 Prognosis: Case Reports

Mürüvvet AKÇAY ÇELİK

Evaluation of Turkish Cypriots’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours About The COVID-19: A Descriptive Study

Ufuk KAYA, Elif GÜNEŞ, Elif EREN, Mohammed ISSA, Emrah GÜLER, Aslı AYKAÇ, Nedim CAKİR, Kaya SÜER

Frequency of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in Patients with Lymphoma

Muhammet ÖZBİLEN, Aysın TULUNAY VİRLAN, Abdullah HACIHANEFİOĞLU

With Strong Steps…

Ülkü KARAMAN

Evaluating Intervertebral Foramen Measurements for Patients with Anterior Cervical Disc Surgery in Oblique CT

Ömer Faruk ŞAHİN, Mehmet Semih ÇAKIR, Muhammet Teoman KARAKURT, Veysel ANTAR