Medi̇ne ALPDEMİR, Mehmet Fatih ALPDEMİR, Zülfiye AKIL

The effect of education and 4-year experience in the evaluation of preanalytical process in a clinical chemistry laboratory

Preanalytical errors have an important ratios in all laboratory processes. To reduce laboratory errors, the IFCC working group on Laboratory Errors and Patient safety (WG-LEPS) developed laboratory quality indicators (QIs) for the preanalytical process. The purpose of this study is to evaluate QIs of the preanalytical process over a 4-year period and show the effect of education. In this study, Balıkesir State Hospital biochemistry laboratory were retrospectively evaluated as rejected sample for four years (between 1st of January 2014 – 31st of December 2017). We examined QIs for preanalytical processes such as; misidentification errors (QIs-5), unintelligible test requests (QIs-6), lost-not received samples (QIs-7), incorrect container/tube (QIs-9), samples hemolyzed (QIs-10), sample clotted (QIs-11), insufficient sample volume (QIs-12), incorrect sample type (QIs-13, unsuitable transportation (QIs-14) and improperly labeled tube (QIs-15). In our hospital, regular training is given to hospital staff and laboratory staff at least twice a year for sample taking, specimen storage and transfer training, as well as laboratory staff, laboratory processes and management of improperly sample. In our study, the preanalytical process error frequency was 0.64%, 0.63%, 0.58% and 0.76% for all years respectively. It is seen that the most frequent error frequency is clotted sample (0.31, 0.32, 0.28 and 0.27 respectively). Other the most common errors was insufficient sample and incorrect container/tube (0.18, 0.15, 0.12, 0.07 and 0.18, 0.07, 0.07, 0.03, respectively). Our results were well below the optimum values recommended by IFFC-WG-LEPS. In order to achieve all these desired goals for QI, the training process must be sustainable and standardized and repeated at appropriate intervals.

PDF

___

Lippi G, Sciacovelli L, Simundic AM, et al. Innovative software for recording preanalytical errors in the IFCC quality indicators. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:51-3.

Sciacovelli L, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, et al. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: the status of the IFCC Working Group “laboratory errors and patient safety” project. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:348-57.

Lippi G, Simundic AM, on behalf of the european federation for clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). The EFLM strategy for harmonization of the preanalytica phase. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017; aop.

Arslan FD, Karakoyun I, Isbilen Basok B, et al. The effects of education and training on phlebotomists for reducing preanalytical errors. J Med Biochem. 2018;7:1-9.

Sciacovelli L, Lippi G, Sumarac Z, et al. Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: the status of the ifcc working group “laboratory errors and patient safety” project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:348-357.

Atay A, Demir L, Cuhadar S, et al. Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;15;24:376-82.

Grecc DS, Vlad DC, Dumitrascu V. Quality indicators in the preanalytical phase of testing in a stat laboratory. Lab Med. 2014;45:74-81.

Sakyi A, Laing E, Ephraim R, et al. Evaluation of analytical errors in a clinical chemistry laboratory: a 3-year experience. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5:8-12.

Lippi G, Bassi A, Brocco G, et al. Preanalytic error tracking in a laboratory medicine department: results of a 1-year experience. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1442-3.

Özcan O, Güreser AS. Sources of preanalytical errors and the role of training in error prevention. Dicle Med J. 2012;39:524-30.

Avcı E, Ceken N, Kangal Z, et al. Approach to pre-analytical errors in a public health laboratory. Turk J Biochem. 2017:42;59-63.

Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Messeri G, et al. Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness. Clin Chem. 2006;44:150-60.

Rattan, Lippi G. Frequency and type of preanalytical errors in a laboratory medicine department in India. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:1657-9.

Aykal G, Yeğin A, Aydin Ö, et al. The impact of educational interventions on reducing the rejection rates in the preanalytical phase. Turk J Biochem. 2014:39;562-566

Lillo R, Salinas M, Lopez-Garrigos M, et al. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions. Clin Lab. 2012;58:911-7. doi