Study of toe deformities in diabetic foot through Amit Jain’s extended ‘SCC’ classification

A study was conducted to analyze the visible named toe deformities that occur in foot of patients with diabetes through the new Amit Jain’s extended ‘SCC’ classification. A total of 27 patients were included who fulfilled the criteria. Majority of the patients (59.3%) were males. 11.1% of patients had diabetes of more than 24 years duration. Type 1 toe deformities were the most common deformities seen in 85.2% of the cases. Hammer toe was the commonest pathological type followed by claw toes. Around 14.8% had underlying callus/ulcers (complex deformity). This new classification is simple and easy to use in clinical practice.

___

1. Kurup R, Ansari AA, Singh J, Raja AV. Wound care knowledge, attitudes and practice among people with and without diabetes presenting with foot ulcer in Guyana. Diabet Foot J. 2019;22:24-31.

2. Yu D, Si-Yuan X, Ying W et al. Non-surgical treatment for foot deformities and lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Diab Foot Comp. 2017;9:8- 14.

3. Jain AKC, Gopal S. Comparing foot evaluation in hospitalized diabetic patients between surgeons, orthopedician and physician’s through Amit Jain’s Triple assessment. East African Scholar J Med Sci. 2020;3:169-78.

4. Rosyid FN. Etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of diabetic foot ulcers. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:420-13.

5. Bakri FG, Allan AH, Khader YS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer and its associated risk factors among diabetic patients in Jordan. J Med J. 2012;46:118-25.

6. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Vela SA, et al. Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:157-62.

7. Allan J, Munro W, Figgins E. Foot Deformities within the diabetic foot and their influence on biomechanics: A review of the literature. Prosthetic Orthotic Int. 2016;40:182-92.

8. Ledoux WR, Shofer JB, Smith DG, et al. Relationship between foot type, foot deformity and ulcer occurrence in the high- risk diabetic foot. J Rehabilit Res Develop. 2005;42:665-72.

9. Jain AKC, Sabasse M. Type 2 diabetic foot complications: an overview. Diab Foot J Middle East. 2015;1:1-4.

10. Jain AKC. Extended application of Amit Jain’s ‘SCC’ classification concept for diabetic foot. International journal of surgery science. 2019;3:188-91.

11. Rosner B. In: Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th Edition, Duxbury; 2000.

12. Riffenburg RH. In: Statistics in Medicine, 2nd Edition, Academic press; 2005.

13. Rao PSSS, Richard J. In: An Introduction to Biostatistics, A manual for students in health sciences. 4th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice hall of India; 2006.

14. Bus SA, Michels RPJ, Maas M, et al. Role of intrinsic muscle atrophy in the etiology of class toe deformity in diabetic neuropathy may not be as straight forward as widely believed. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1063-7.

15. Van Schie CHM, Carrington AL, Vermigli C, et al. Muscle weakness and foot deformities in diabetes Relationship to neuropathy and foot ulceration in Caucasian diabetic men. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1668-73.

16. Ababneh A, Bakri FG, Khader Y, et al. Prevalence and associates of foot deformities among patients with diabetes in Jordan. Curr Diabet Rev. 2020;16:471-82.

17. Ogbera AO, Adedokun A, Fasanmade OA, et al. The foot at risk in Nigerians with diabetes mellitus-The Nigerian scenario. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2005;4:165-73.

18. Mansour AA, Imran HJ. Foot abnormalities in Diabetics: Prevalence and predictors in Basrah, Iraq. Pak J Med Sci. 2006;22:229-33.

19. Odyor PR, Ondari NJ. The prevalence of Diabetic foot at risk (diabetic foot neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease) in a selected Kenyan population. IJSRIT. 2016;3:63-74.

20. Premkumar R, Rajan P, Rima J, et al. Footwear in the causation and prevention of foot ulcers in diabetes mellitus. Natl Med J India. 2017;30:255-61.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )