Serkan SÜRÜCÜ, Hüseyin Sina COŞKUN, Lokman KEHRİBAR

Modified percutaneous repair of acute achilles tendon rupture: A sliding knot technique using absorbable suture

The purpose of this study was to describe our technique and to assess its clinical efficacy. The modified percutaneous approach, we hypothesized, would provide additional resistance to tendon lengthening during the healing process. Between 2017 and 2019, 28 patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture received treatment with a sliding- locking knot and absorbable suture in a modified percutaneous technique. After eligibility criteria, a total of 23 consecutive patients enrolled in this study. Participants in the study ranged in age from 18 to 50 years. Polydioxanone suture (PDS) was utilized in all patients. From the middle medial stab incision to the proximal lateral incision, an oblique injection with a PDS-loaded semi-curved needle was made. Samsung Medical Center (SMC) sliding knot was used to form a self-locking loop by pulling the post strand. At the final follow-up, patients were evaluated postoperatively using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot Questionnaire score. The mean age of the patients was 37.5±6.1 years (range, 28-47 years). The mean AOFAS score, ATRA degree, calf circumference, and single-leg heel raise count at the last follow-up were 93.4±4.1 (range, 88-100), 55.4±6.2 degrees (range, 45–74 degrees), 38.4±7.1 cm (range, 28–49 cm) and 39.5±8.3 (range, 27–96). The mean operation duration was 14.4±3.2 minutes (range, 10–23 min). Temporarily, the sural nerve damage was found in 2 patients (8.7%). The neurological symptoms resolved within three months of the surgery. A modified percutaneous method utilizing an absorbable suture and a sliding-locking knot may be an acceptable treatment option for AATR due to its low complication rate and rapid return to work.

PDF

___

1. Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, et al. Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017:1236-43.
2. Yang B, Liu Y, Kan S, et al. Outcomes and complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017:178-86.
3. Agres AN, Arampatzis A, Gehlen T, et al. Muscle fascicles exhibit limited passive elongation throughout the rehabilitation of achilles tendon rupture after percutaneous repair. Front Physiol. 2020:746.
4. Yassin M, Myatt R, Thomas W, et al. Does size of tendon gap affect patientreported outcome following Achilles tendon rupture treated with functional rehabilitation? Bone Joint J. 2020:1535-41.
5. Diniz P, Pacheco J, Fernandes RM, et al. Modified triple Kessler with least risk of elongation among Achilles tendon repair techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of human cadaveric studies [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jun 5]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;10.1007/s00167-021-06613-9.
6. Heikkinen J, Lantto I, Piilonen J, et al. Tendon Length, calf muscle atrophy, and strength deficit after acute achilles tendon rupture: long-term follow-up of patients in a previous study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017:1509-15.
7. Hurmeydan OM, Demirel M, Valiyev N, et al. Relationship of postoperative achilles tendon elongation with plantarflexion strength following surgical repair. Foot Ankle Int. 2020:140-6.
8. Ma GW, Griffith TG. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977:247-55.
9. Stavenuiter XJR, Lubberts B, Prince RM, et al. Postoperative complications following repair of acute achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;679- 86.
10. Meulenkamp B, Woolnough T, Cheng W, et al. What is the best evidence to guide management of acute achilles tendon ruptures? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021:2119-31.
11. Maempel JF, Clement ND, Wickramasinghe NR, et al. Operative repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture does not give superior patient-reported outcomes to nonoperative management. Bone Joint J. 2020:933-40.
12. Manegold S, Tsitsilonis S, Gehlen T, etl al. Alterations in structure of the muscle-tendon unit and gait pattern after percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture with the Dresden instrument. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019:529-33.
13. Clanton TO, Haytmanek CT, Williams BT, et al. A biomechanical comparison of an open repair and 3 minimally invasive percutaneous achilles tendon repair techniques during a simulated, progressive rehabilitation protocol. Am J Sports Med. 2015:1957-64.
14. Carmont MR, Zellers JA, Brorsson A, et al. Age and tightness of repair are predictors of heel-rise height after achilles tendon rupture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020:8:2325967120909556.
15. Görmeli G, Görmeli CA, Maraş Özdemir Z, et al. Yumuşak doku tutulumu olan patellanın dev hücreli tümörü: Alternatif bir tedavi yöntemi ve literatür derlemesi [A patellar giant-cell tumor with soft tissue involvement: an alternative treatment method and review of the literature]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015:110-5.
16. Jordan MC, Boelch S, Jansen H, et al. Does plastic suture deformation induce gapping after tendon repair? A biomechanical comparison of different suture materials. J Biomech. 2016:2607-12.
17. Kocaoglu B, Ulku TK, Gereli A, et al. Evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for repair of achilles tendon rupture with a sutureguiding device. Foot Ankle Int. 2015:691-5.