Knowledge and opinions on nurses’ Team Work’s

The aim of this study is to determine the knowledge and opinions of the nurses about teamwork. This descriptive study was conducted with 206 nurses in Şahinbey Education Research and Application Hospital. Data were collected using the questionnaire prepared by the researchers, and the ‘’ Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire ‘’ (T-TAQ). Number, percentage, mean ± standard deviation and Chi-square, t-test, and ANOVA analysis were performed as descriptive statistics. 72.8% of the nurses are female, and 27.2% are male. The mean age of the nurses was 29.8 ± 4.8 years. 73.3% of the nurses were trained on the subject during primary education, 55.3% of them were trained on the subject after graduation, and 58.3% of them stated that teamwork was carried out in the unit they were working in. The mean score of the Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire was 107.96 ± 23.21. Despite receiving the lowest score from the mutual support sub-dimension, this score is above the mean. The highest mean score was taken from the leadership sub-dimension. It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the team structure and the mutual support sub-dimension in the comparison of the gender and teamwork attitudes scores of the nurses (p

___

1. Michan S, Rodger S. Characteristics of effective teams: A literature review. Australian Health Review. 2000;23:201-8.

2. Katzenbach JR, Smith D.K. The discipline of teams: A mind book-workbook for delivering small group performance. John Wiley & Sons.Inc, Canada, 2002;1-22.

3. Özdemir U. Psikiyatri tedavi ekibinin ekip çalışması kavramına ilişkin kendi bilgilerini ve çalıştıkları psikiyatri tedavi kurumlarını değerlendirmeleri. Kriz Dergisi. 1999;7:17-24.

4. Şahin Ü. Hastane İşletmeciliğinde Kalite, Eskişehir. 1999 https://tr.scribd.com/document/.../HASTANE-İŞLETMECİLİĞİ-UMİT-ŞAHİN erişim tarihi 20.07.2017

5. McCleary KJ. Determinants of workgroup effectiveness: An empirical examination of health care teams. (Unpublished Dissertation), The Faculty of Graduate School, The University of Alabama, 1998.

6. Leggat SG. Effective healthcare teams require effective team members; defining teamwork competencies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:17.

7. Gonzales RA. Health care team effectiveness: The relationship between team task ınterdependence and group emotional competence. (Unpublished Dissertation), School of Advanced Studies, University of Phoenix, 2010.

8. Hall P, Weaver L. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: A long and winding road. Med Educat. 2001;35:867-75.

9. Manser T. Team work and patient safety in dynamic do-mains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:143-51.

10. Tekin S. Sağlık bakım sistemi içinde sağlık ekip hizmetleri ve hemşirenin rolleri üzerine bir çalışma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2010.

11. Yardımcı F, Başbakkal Z, Beytut D, ve ark. Ekip çalışması tutumları ölçeği’nin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2012;13:131-7.

12. Katzenbach JR. Teams at the top: Unleashing the potential of both teams and ındividual leaders. Harvard Business Press. 1998.

13. Baltas A. Ekip çalışması ve liderlik. Remzi Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2000.

14. Jansen L. Collaborative and interdisciplinary health care teams: ready or not?. J Professional Nurs. 2008;24:218-27.

15. Çarıkçı GH, Oksay A. Doktorlar ve hemşireler: Aynı ekipte farklı tutumlar. Hastane Yönetimi. 2006;10:28-39.

16. Dellasega C, Mılone-Nuzzo P, Curcı KM, et al. The humanities interface of nursing and medicine. J Professional Nurs. 2007;23:174-9.

17. Harris KT, Treanor CM, Salisbury ML. Improving patient safety with team coordination: challenges and strategies of implementation. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:557-66.

18. Oflaz F. Psikiyatri kliniğinde tedavi edici ortam kavramı ve hemşirenin sorumlulukları. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2006;7:55-61.

19. Yıldırım A, Aktaş T, Akdaş A. Tıp fakültesi ve hemşirelik yüksekokulu öğrencilerinde hekim – hemşire işbirliği. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2006;5:166-75.

20. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. Bmj. 2000;320:745-9.

21. Ulusoy H, Tokgöz MD. Hekim ve hemşirelerin ekip çalışmasına ilişkin görüşleri. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi. 2009;2:55-61.

22. Canlı F. Sağlık çalışanlarının ekip çalışmasına ilişkin görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, 2010.

23. Uygur E, Kaya N, Kaya H, vd. Bir devlet hastanesinde çalışan hemşirelerin sağlık ekibi hizmeti anlayışları ve yaşanan sorunlar. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2008;16:102-13.

24. Jackson CL, Nicholson C, Davidson B, et al. Training the primary care team--a successful interprofessional education initiative. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35:829-2.

25. Taylan S. Ameliyathane ekiplerinde ekip çalışmasına yönelik tutumlar ve ekip çalışmasını algılama ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2002.

26. Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the Med Teams project. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1553-81.

27. Hull LM. Teamwork in the operating theatre: Scientific principles of assessment and clinical applications. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Imperial College London, 2013.

28. Önler E, Yıldız T, Süzen RE, vd. Hemşirelik bölümü öğrencilerinin ekip çalışması tutumları ile duygusal zeka düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014;2:19-29.

29. Öğüt A, Kaya D. Sağlık kurumlarında ekip çalışması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2011;1:87-95.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Pregnancy outcome of patients who conceive after bariatric surgery

Mehmet KECECİOGLU

The comparison of DNA extraction techniques in human bone and tooth samples exposed to high heat

Emel Hulya YUKSELOGLU, Kadir DASTAN, Fatma Cavus YONAR, Gülten RAYİMOĞLU, Ömer KARATAŞ, Dilek Salkim ISLEK, Muzaffer Berna DOGAN

Prognostic impact of primary tumor location on survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A single center experience

Tarik DEMİR, Ezgi COBAN, Murat ARAZ, Altay ALİYEV, Mesut SEKER, Haci Mehmet TURK

Assessment of pituitary function in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: The effect of radiotherapy

Ozlem Ozkaya AKAGUNDUZ, Banu Sarer YUREKLİ, Ilgin Yildirim SİMSİR, Mustafa ESASSOLAK

The relationship between VITiligo and endothelial nitric oxide GLU298ASP and intron 4 VNTR polymorphism

Ebru Derici EKER, Nilgun Solak TEKİN, Sevim Karakas CELİK, Nefise OZLEN SAHİN

Green synthesized silver nanoparticles: Morphology and antibacterial contact effects

Erdi BİLGİC, Sinem Gurkan AYDİN, Arzu OZGEN, Mustafa NİZAMLİOGLU

Na+ channel blocker enhances metformin effects on neuroblastoma cell line

Ali TAGHİZADEHGHALEHJOUGHİ, Ahmet HACİMUFTUOGLU, Aysegul YİLMAZ

Knowledge and opinions on nurses’ Team Work’s

Selver GULER, Sezer AVCİ, Betul KAPLAN, Feride YİGİT, Hatice AKKURT DURAN

Anesthesia management of open tracheostomy patients: A single center experience

Erol KARAASLAN, Mehmet Ridvan YALİN

The evaluation of the effect of coronary collateral formation on left ventricular function by using strain echocardiography

Nuray Kahraman AY, Cihan OREM