Evaluation of monitorization in anesthesia applications outside the operating room, compatibility of standard infrastructure and equipment : A survey study

Evaluation of monitorization in anesthesia applications outside the operating room, compatibility of standard infrastructure and equipment : A survey study

We aimed to evaluate the suitability of monitoring, standard infrastructure and equipment in anesthesia applications of anesthesiology reanimation specialists and resident physicians working in Istanbul and increase the awareness of them. 106 anesthesiology reanimation specialists and resident physicians working in Istanbul and Malatya included in the study. The results of the survey consisted of 31 questions were obtained by collecting data via electronic data form on the web. Statistical analysis was used. In our study, the presence of oxygen supply, aspirator and probes in the areas of anesthesia outside the operating room, the presence of light source is sufficient, the most commonly used respiratory parameters of the monitoring methods and cardiovascular monitoring was followed. In these areas it was seen that 94% of the emergency trolleys were found and in the emergency boxes it was seen that the drugs used for cardiac arrhythmia and arrest treatment were usually found. There was a 40% defibrillator and a 60% support team for emergency situations and 56% of the system that could communicate for assistance. 74% of the recovery unit and 37% of the waste gas system were found outside the operating room. We believe that monitoring, compliance of standard infrastructure and equipment are effective to prevent complications in anesthesia outside the operating room applications.

___

  • 1. Kotob F, Twersky RS. Anesthesia outside the operating room: General overview and monitoring standards. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2003;41:1-15.
  • 2. Meloni C. Morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2005;71:325-34.
  • 3. Bell C, Sequeira PM. Nonoperating room anesthesia for children. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2005;18:271-6.
  • 4. Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation 2005. Anesthesia Practice Guides. Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Applications.
  • 5. Silber JH, Kennedy SK, Even-Shoshan O. et al. Anesthesiologist direction and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:152-63.
  • 6. Aydın A. Our Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Applications. for 3 months. Evaluation of 2268 Patients in the Period. Adıyaman University Health J Sciences. 2018;4:850-63.
  • 7. Berkow L.C. Anesthetic management and human factors in the intraoperative MRI environment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:563-7.
  • 8. Robbertze R, Posner KL, Domino KB. Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaestesiol 2006;19:436-42.
  • 9. Applegate RL , Lenart J, Malkin M. et al. Advanced monitoring is associated with fewer alarm events during planned moderate procedurerelated sedation: A 2-part pilot trial. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1070-8.
  • 10. Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V. et al. EPAGE Study Group, Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE), Endoscopy. 2006;38:461-9.
  • 11. Mehmet Yildiz, Leyla Iyilikci, Seden Duru et al. The attitudes and behaviors of anaesthesiology and reanimation specialists in anaesthesia care applications outside the operating room in Turkey: A survey investigation. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014;42:196-213.
  • 12. Karamnov S , Sarkisian N, Grammer R, et al. Analysis of adverse events associated with adult moderate procedural sedation outside the operating room. J Patient Saf. 2017;13:111-21.
  • 13. ASA. Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations: committee of origin: standards and practice parameters (approved by the ASA house of delegates on October 19, 1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013). ASA; 2013.
  • 14. SIAARTI Study Group For Safety in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Recommendations for anesthesia and sedation in nonoperating room locations. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2005;71:11-20.
  • 15. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on postanesthetic care. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:742–52.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Uridine derivatives: Antifungal, PASS outcomes, ADME/T, drug-likeliness, molecular docking and binding energy calculations

Sarkar Mohammad Abe Kawsar, Tahmida Shamsuddin, Mohammed Anowar Hosen, Muhammad Shaiful Alam, Talha Bin Emran

Analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography measurements following retinal detachment surgery

Tugba Ceti̇nkaya, Muhammed Mustafa Kurt

Comparison of pupillometry measurements in myopic, emmetropic and hyperopic children

Cetin Akpolat, Alper Halil Bayat, Muhammed Mustafa Kurt

The course of acute appendicitis disease i̇n the COVID-19 period

Ahmet Pergel, Mikail Uyan, Suleyman Kalcan, Ali Ozdemir, Ahmet Karakaya, Gokhan Demiral, Oguzhan Ustaoglu

Pharmacological and biological features of ethanol extract of Salvia virgata Jacq.

Merve Ergul, Nuraniye Eruygur, Tansu Uskutoglu, Esra Uçar, Mehmet Atas, Belgin COŞGE ŞENKAL, Halil BAL

Examination of patients admitted to the emergency department with blunt chest trauma

Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Hayriye Gonullu, Arife Erdogan

Betrayal trauma, dissociative experiences and dysfunctional family dynamics: Flashbacks, self-harming behaviors and suicide attempts in post-traumatic stress disorder and dissociative disorders

Erdinc Ozturk, Barishan Erdogan

Comparison of mental disorders seen at the end of the first wave of the Covid 19 pandemic with sociodemographic data

Elif Aktan Mutlu, Emine Yagmur Zorbozan

The effect of acceptance of illness on the comfort level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Seyhan Citlik Saritas, Gurkan Ozden

A comparative analysis of long-term life qualities of head and neck cancer (nasopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers) patients who were treated with the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): Expectations and outcomes

Mehmet Turan Cicek, Mehmet Aslan