Evaluation of monitorization in anesthesia applications outside the operating room, compatibility of standard infrastructure and equipment : A survey study

Evaluation of monitorization in anesthesia applications outside the operating room, compatibility of standard infrastructure and equipment : A survey study

We aimed to evaluate the suitability of monitoring, standard infrastructure and equipment in anesthesia applications of anesthesiology reanimation specialists and resident physicians working in Istanbul and increase the awareness of them. 106 anesthesiology reanimation specialists and resident physicians working in Istanbul and Malatya included in the study. The results of the survey consisted of 31 questions were obtained by collecting data via electronic data form on the web. Statistical analysis was used. In our study, the presence of oxygen supply, aspirator and probes in the areas of anesthesia outside the operating room, the presence of light source is sufficient, the most commonly used respiratory parameters of the monitoring methods and cardiovascular monitoring was followed. In these areas it was seen that 94% of the emergency trolleys were found and in the emergency boxes it was seen that the drugs used for cardiac arrhythmia and arrest treatment were usually found. There was a 40% defibrillator and a 60% support team for emergency situations and 56% of the system that could communicate for assistance. 74% of the recovery unit and 37% of the waste gas system were found outside the operating room. We believe that monitoring, compliance of standard infrastructure and equipment are effective to prevent complications in anesthesia outside the operating room applications.

___

  • 1. Kotob F, Twersky RS. Anesthesia outside the operating room: General overview and monitoring standards. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2003;41:1-15.
  • 2. Meloni C. Morbidity and mortality related to anesthesia outside the operating room. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2005;71:325-34.
  • 3. Bell C, Sequeira PM. Nonoperating room anesthesia for children. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2005;18:271-6.
  • 4. Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation 2005. Anesthesia Practice Guides. Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Applications.
  • 5. Silber JH, Kennedy SK, Even-Shoshan O. et al. Anesthesiologist direction and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:152-63.
  • 6. Aydın A. Our Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Applications. for 3 months. Evaluation of 2268 Patients in the Period. Adıyaman University Health J Sciences. 2018;4:850-63.
  • 7. Berkow L.C. Anesthetic management and human factors in the intraoperative MRI environment. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29:563-7.
  • 8. Robbertze R, Posner KL, Domino KB. Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaestesiol 2006;19:436-42.
  • 9. Applegate RL , Lenart J, Malkin M. et al. Advanced monitoring is associated with fewer alarm events during planned moderate procedurerelated sedation: A 2-part pilot trial. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1070-8.
  • 10. Froehlich F, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V. et al. EPAGE Study Group, Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE), Endoscopy. 2006;38:461-9.
  • 11. Mehmet Yildiz, Leyla Iyilikci, Seden Duru et al. The attitudes and behaviors of anaesthesiology and reanimation specialists in anaesthesia care applications outside the operating room in Turkey: A survey investigation. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014;42:196-213.
  • 12. Karamnov S , Sarkisian N, Grammer R, et al. Analysis of adverse events associated with adult moderate procedural sedation outside the operating room. J Patient Saf. 2017;13:111-21.
  • 13. ASA. Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing locations: committee of origin: standards and practice parameters (approved by the ASA house of delegates on October 19, 1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013). ASA; 2013.
  • 14. SIAARTI Study Group For Safety in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Recommendations for anesthesia and sedation in nonoperating room locations. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2005;71:11-20.
  • 15. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on postanesthetic care. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:742–52.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of the relationship of temporomandibular disorders and the morphology of the mandible

Suayip Burak Duman, Bahadir Sancar, Busra Karadeniz, Omer Faruk Boylu, Ertunc Dayi

Determination of the prevalence of dental anomalies by digital panoramic radiography analysis

Neslihan Yilmaz Cirakoglu, Mihriban Gokcek

Determinants of anxiety level in patients presenting with the diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder during the Covid-19 pandemic process

Oguzhan Bekir Egi̇lmez, Behice Han Almi̇s, Seyma Sehlikoglu

Bilateral ossified subdural hematoma: Literature review

Nermin Tanik, Sevilay Vural, Hakan Ak, Ihsan Canbek

Effects of smoking on pulmonary functions in aviation personnel

Erdinc Ercan, Abdurrahman Engin Demir, Ecem Dak

Disease activation and laboratory parameters in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Relationship with C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, mean platelet volume

Rabia Aydogan Baykara, Tugba Izci Duran, Melih Pamukcu

Distal radius torus fractures overlooked in emergency department: What happens?

Serdar Toy, Abdullah Osman Kocak, Ahmet Kose, Sultan Tuna AKGOL GUR, Mehmet Cenk Turgut

In silico binding affinity of multi-therapeutic agent Pinostrobin on various mammalian albumins: Computational evaluation of animal models

Esma Eryilmaz Dogan

Comparison of neurosurgery, polyclinic and clinical applications with the last 5 years during the pandemic period

Serhat YILDIZHAN, Mehmet Gazi BOYACI, Adem ASLAN, Usame RAKİP, İhsan CANBEK, Lokman KİRAN

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of treosulfan-fludarabine and busulfancyclophosphamide conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Emin Kaya, ÖMER FARUK BAHÇECİOĞLU, Selim Gok, Mehmet Ali Erkurt, Irfan Kuku, Ahmet SARICI, Soykan BİÇİM