Yusuf OZTURK, Burcu Rahsan ERİM

Assessment of the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of children and adolescents who are sent to an affiliated university hospital for forensic psychiatric examination

This study aimed to investigate the socio-demographic data, the reason and frequency of forensic application, and the presence of additional mental disorders in children and adolescents who applied for a forensic psychiatric examination to an affiliated university hospital. Pediatric psychiatry files of the patients who applied to Abant İzzet Baysal Mental Health and Diseases Policlinic outpatient clinic of Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University between 2016-2018 were screened retrospectively and the data were evaluated in SPSS 22.0. The mean age of 117 patients included in the study was 14.86 ± 3.37, 54(46.2%) were female and 63(53.8%) were male. The most common reason for being sent is the claims within the scope of evaluation and health measures in terms of perceiving the legal meaning and consequences of the crimes committed with 33 applications. There was a statistically significant difference between males and females in terms of forensic assessment. At least one psychiatric diagnosis was made in 69.1% of the cases and the most common diagnosis was mental retardation. Dissemination of regional studies of forensic assessment and identification of differences by the province may contribute to the more efficient and functional use of resources. In addition to contributing to the improvement programs to be made after forensic assessments, pre-crime is also of value in terms of identifying the causes of crime, especially in children and adolescents.

PDF

___

1. Ereş F. A social problem: Delinquency children and importance of family. Aile ve Toplum. 2009;5:88-96.

2. Uluğtekin S. Hükümlü Çocuk ve Yeniden Toplumsallaşma. Ankara, Bizim Büro Press, 1991.

3. UNICEF. Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme 1989. http://www.unicefturk.org/public/uploads/files/UNICEF_CocukHaklarinaDairSozlesme.pdf. access date 10.11.2019.

4. Hockenberry S, Puzzanchera C. Juvenile Court Statistics 2013. http://www.ncjj.org/Publication/Juvenile-Court-Statistics-2013.aspx. access date 20.11.2019.

5. Çopur EÖ, Ulutaşdemir N, Balsak H. Çocuk ve suç. Hacettepe Univ Fac Heal Sci J 2015;1:120-4.

6. Türkiye Çocuk Suç İstatistikleri 2017. http://www.tuik.com.tr. access date 11.12.2019.

7. İçli T. Kriminoloji. Ankara, Bizim Büro Press,2001.

8. Akyüz, E. Ulusal ve uluslararası hukukta çocuğun haklarının ve güvenliğinin korunması. Ankara, Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Press,2001.

9. Uluslararası Çocuk Mevzuatı. http://www. Unicef panel.unicef.org. Data of access: November 20, 2019.

10. Baysan Arabacı L, Taş G. Dragging factors in juvenile delinquency, mental health problems, and nursing care. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2017;8:110-7.

11. Ayaz M, Ayaz AB, Soylu N. Psychiatric evaluation of child and adolescent forensic cases. J Clin Psy. 2012;15:33-40.

12. Çakaloz B, Ünlü G, Aktaş Terzioğlu M, et al. Relation of juvenile criminal behavior to sociodemographic features and intelligence. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016;17:411-8.

13. Oldehinkel AJ, Hartman CA, De Winter AF, et al. Temperament profiles associated with internalizing and externalizing problems in preadolescence. Dev Psychopathol. 2004;16:421-40.

14. Loeber R, Pardini D. Neurobiology and the development of violence: common assumptions and controversies. Phil Trans R Soc. 2008;363:24912503.

15. Farrington DP. Predictors causes and correlates of male youth violence. M Tonry, M Moore (Eds.), Youth Violence, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998, p.421-75.

16. Barkley RA, Fischer M, Smallish L, et al. Young adult follow-up of hyperactive children: antisocial activities and drug use. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45:195- 211.

17. Savaşır I, Şahin N. Wechsler Çocuklar İçin Zeka Ölçeği (WISC-R). Ankara Türk Psikologlar Derneği, 1995.

18. Göker Z, Hesapçıoğlu ST, Sarp KS, et al. Evaluation of psycholegal subjects admitted to K.T.U child and adolescent psychiatry department at last two years. J Forensic Med. 2006;20:1-5.

19. Şen S, Karbeyaz K, Toygar M, et al. Sociodemographic evaluation of children pushed into crime in Eskisehir. J Forensic Med. 2012;26:146-55.

20. Aksu H, Karakoç Demirkaya S, Gürbüz Özgü B, et al. Evaluation of child and adolescent forensic cases within one year in Aydın city, in Turkey. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2013;14:369-77.

21. Okullaşma verileri 2017. http://www.tuik.com.tr. Data of access: December 11, 2019.

22. Tittle CR, Ward DA, Grasmick HG. Gender, age and crime deviance: A challange to self-control theory. J Res Crime Delinq. 2003;40:426-53.

23. Bayındır N, Özel A, Köksal E. The demography of juvenile deliquency: A sample of the city of Kütahya. Turkish Journal of Police Studies. 2007; 95-108.

24. Akduman GG, Akduman B, Cantürk G. Investigation of the some personal and familial characteristics of juvenile delinquency. Türk Pediatri Ars. 2007;42:156-61.

25. Uğur N, Türkcan S, Geyran P. Adli psikiyatride çocuk ve ergen suçları. Dusunen Adam. 1994;7:20-4.

26. İlçe A, Erkol MH, Alpteker H, et al. Retrospective analysis of forensic case reports who had applied to the emergency service in the city centre of Bolu. Abant Med J. 2018;7:68-75.

27. Bircan S, Bacanlı F. Ergenlerin duygusal zekalarının çatışma eğilimlerine ve suç davranışlarına etkisi. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2005;22:61-82.

28. Glancy GD, Ash P, Bath EP, et al. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Assessment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2015;43:3-53.