Objective: This study aimed to discover patients’ perspectives on the factors that influence the referral process by using structural equation modeling (SEM) and testing the determinants of the referral process.Materials and Methods: This observational study was consisted of 1.300 patients and finally total of 968 participants completed the questionnaire. A self-reported questionnaire consisting of ten items was used. It comprised questions about demographic variables, medical and dental histories, frequency of dental visits, and personal attitudes toward the referral process. In the present study, SEM models consisted of path analysis, multiple regression, and multivariate regression analysis with continuous type data. Results: The model showed that “number of decayed teeth” and “number of missing teeth” had a directly predictive effect on referral process. Gender, age, education and income level, habitation, and dental visit frequency had indirectly predictive effects on the referral process. Conclusion: Pain related with number of missing teeth and functional limitation related with number of missing teeth had directly predictive effect on the referral process from the patients’ perspective
___
1. Association(ADA). Specialist Referrals and Practice Advisors, American Dental Association, The ADA Practical Guide to Starting Your Dental Practice. ADA. 2010(165).
2. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Variation, treatment outcomes, and practice guidelines in dental practice. J Dent Educ 1995; 59: 61-95.
3. Zemanovich MR, Bogacki RE, Abbott DM, Maynard JG, Lanning SK. Demographic variables affecting patient referrals from general practice dentists to periodontists. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 341-9.
4. Dockter KM, Williams KB, Bray KS, Cobb CM. Relationship between prereferral periodontal care and periodontal status at time of referral. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1708-16.
5. Lanning SK, Best AM, Hunt RJ. Periodontal services rendered by general practitioners. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 823-32.
6. Park CH, Thomas MV, Branscum AJ, Harrison E, Al-Sabbagh M. Factors influencing the periodontal referral process. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 1288-94.
7. De Bondt B, Aartman IH, Zentner A. Referral patterns of Dutch general dental practitioners to orthodontic specialists. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 548-54.
8. Ghiabi E, Matthews DC. Periodontal practice and referral profile of general dentists in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Can Dent Assoc 2012; 78: c55.
9. Berlin V, Pūrienė A, Pečiulienė V, Aleksejūnienė J. Treatment procedures and referral patterns of general dentists in Lithuania. Medicina 2015; 51: 296-301.
10. Kline RB. Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling: na; 2011.
11. Sischo L, Broder H. Oral health-related quality of life: what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 1264-70.
12. Wong A, McMillan A, McGrath C. Oral health-related quality of life and severe hypodontia. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 869-73.
13. Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 126.
14. Li Y, Gao Y, Zhang Y. The impact of oral health status on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of 12-year-olds from children’s and parents’ perspectives. Community Dent Health 2014; 31: 240-4.
15. Christensen LB, Hede B, Nielsen E. A cross-sectional study of oral health and oral health-related quality of life among frail elderly persons on admission to a special oral health care programme in Copenhagen City, Denmark. Gerodontology 2012; 29.
16. Thomas BS, Bhat M, Nair S. Periodontal diseases and awareness among patients. Indian J Dent Res 2005; 16: 103-8.
17. Renvert S, Persson RE, Persson GR. A history of frequent dental care reduces the risk of tooth loss but not periodontitis in older subjects. Swed Dent J 2011; 35: 69-75.
18. World Health Organization(WHO). Fact Sheet No 318 A, p1.