Rusya’nın Egemen Demokrasi Modelinin Orta Asya Devletleri Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi
Analysis of the Impact of Russia’s Sovereign Democracy Model on Central Asian States
Russia appeared to be a country that did not eschew from resorting to hard power instruments suchas military intervention and economic sanctions in the post-Cold War period. Moscow fought a battleagainst Georgia over South Ossetia in August 2008. It also sent its military personnel to Crimea tocapture strategic points and to take control of the critical infrastructure in February 2014, shortlybefore the referendum which would decide whether the peninsula would merge with Russia. Russiaalso occasionally cut off natural gas supplies to Georgia and Ukraine in the middle of winter when thesetwo pro-Western states failed to pay their accumulated natural gas debt. Yet, Moscow starting from themid-2000s has been taking serious and systematic steps to strengthen and expand its soft power basein its immediate neighbourhood as well. These efforts speeded up in the wake of colour revolutionsin Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan which resulted in the replacement of friendly governments thatpaid special attention to Russian concerns and sensitivities with new leaders and cadres that aimedto bring their countries closer to the West. This article will examine the Central Asian dimension ofRussia’s soft power policy by borrowing the soft power concept of Joseph Nye. Nye defines soft poweras the capacity to have an impact on or shape the preferences of others by relying upon intangibleassets such as political values, international institutions and culture. So, the study will start with theanalysis of the extent of recognition of Russia’s political values, especially its sovereign democracymodel which prioritizes the demands of the state over those of individuals, lays emphasis on theprinciples of independence, sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs in the intercourse withother states and underlines the primacy of traditional and conservative values such as unity, solidarityand family over individualism, feminism and LGBT rights by the Central Asian political elites. Thearticle will then move on to explore the extent of Russia’s success in exporting the main tenets of thesovereign democracy model to Central Asia by examining some of the agreements, declarations,decisions and practices of the international institutions such as the Commonwealth of IndependentStates, the Collective Security Treaty Organization and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization whichplay significant role in the region. The study will end with the assessment of the cultural aspect of theRussian soft power in Central Asia by investigating the prevalence of Russian language, Russian highereducation institutions, Russian media and Russian mass entertainment in the region.
___
- Ambrosio, T. (2008) “Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes
Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia”, Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8): 1321-1344.
Amnesty International (2017). Kyrgyzstan 2016/2017. https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-andcentral-
asia/kyrgyzstan/report-kyrgyzstan/ (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
Azizov, D. (2016, December 5). CIS Mission: Uzbek Presidential Election Held at High Level. Trend
Azerbaijan.
Baumann, R. F. (2018) “A Central Asian Perspective on Russian Soft Power: The View from Tashkent”,
Military Review, 98(4): 48-63.
Bogdanova, S. Effectiveness of Russian Soft Power towards the Members of the Commonwealth of
Independent States. https://www.academia.edu/11564001/Effectiveness_of_Russian_soft_
power_towards_the_members_of_the_Commonwealth_of_Independent_States (Erişim Tarihi:
06.01.2018).
Carr, E. H. (1939) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,
London: Macmillan and Co.
CCDCOE (2017). Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. https://ccdcoe.org/sco.html (Erişim Tarihi:
21.01.2018).
Cwiek-Karpowicz, J. (2012) “Limits to Russian Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Area”, DGAPanalyse, (8): 1-11.
Eurasian Development Bank (2017) EDB Integration Barometer – 2017, Saint Petersburg: Eurasian
Development Bank Centre for Integration Studies.
Federation of American Scientists (2000). The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. https://fas.
org/nuke/guide/russia/doctrine/econcept.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
Fergana.Ru (2016). Tajikistan’s Imitation Civil Society. http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2970 (Erişim
Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
Freedom House (2016). Freedom on the Net 2016 Uzbekistan Country Profile. https://freedomhouse.org/
report/freedom-net/2016/uzbekistan (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
Freedom House (2017). Nations in Transit 2017 Tajikistan Country Profile. https://freedomhouse.org/
report/nations-transit/2017/tajikistan (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
Gorecki, W. (2014) “Ever Further from Moscow: Russia’s Stance on Central Asia”, OSW Studies, (48): 1-97.
Hemment, J. (2012) “Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and Potemkin NGOs: Making Sense of Civil Society in
Post-Soviet Russia”, Slavic Review, 71(2): 234-260.
Hoare, J., M. Weicherding (2016) “Russia’s Influence in Shrinking Civic Space in Central Asia”, in A. Hug
(ed.), Sharing Worst Practice: How Countries and Institutions in the Former Soviet Union Help Create
Legal Tools of Repression, London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 25-27.
Hooper, M. (2016) “Russia’s ‘Traditional Values’ Leadership”, in A. Hug (ed.), Sharing Worst Practice: How
Countries and Institutions in the Former Soviet Union Help Create Legal Tools of Repression, London:
The Foreign Policy Centre, 33-42.
Human Rights Watch (2017a). Russia Events of 2016, World Report 2017. https://www.hrw.org/worldreport/
2017/country-chapters/russia (Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2017).
Human Rights Watch (2017b). Russia: Government vs. Rights Groups: The Battle Chronicle. https://www.
hrw.org/russia-government-against-rights-groups – battle-chronicle (Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2017).
Human Rights Watch (2017c). Kazakhstan Events of 2016, World Report 2017. https://www.hrw.org/worldreport/
2017/country-chapters/kazakhstan (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
IFESCCO (2018). About the Intergovernmental Foundation for Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Cooperation (IFESCCO). http://www.mfgs-sng.org/eng/ (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
International Telecommunication Union (2008). Information Security Doctrine of the Russian Federation.
https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Documents/National_Strategies_Repository/
Russia_2000.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
IPA (2013). IPA CIS Observers: Elections in Tajikistan Were Transparent. http://iacis.ru/eng/pressroom/
news/mezhdunarodnyy_institut_monitoringa_razvitiya_demokratii/ipa_cis_observers_elections_
in_tajikistan_were_transparent/ (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
IPA (2015). IPA CIS Observers Say Elections in Tajikistan Comply with the Law. http://iacis.ru/eng/
pressroom/news/mezhdunarodnyy_institut_monitoringa_razvitiya_demokratii/ipa_cis_
observers_say_elections_in_tajikistan_comply_with_the_law/ (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
Jackson, N. J. (2010) “The Role of External Factors in Advancing Non-liberal Democratic Forms of Political
Rule: A Case Study of Russia’s Influence on Central Asian Regimes”, Contemporary Politics, 16(1):
101-118.
Kumar, V. (2015) “Russia’s ‘Foreign Agent’ Law: A Response to American Democratic Promotion Policy”,
Comparative Politics, 1(18): 90-100.
Laruelle, M. (2017, August 14). Russia’s Eurasianist Soft Power in Central Asia. Eurasian Studies.
Lavrov, S. (2012). Russia in the 21st-Century World of Power. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/Russia-inthe-
21st-Century-World-of-Power-15809 (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
Levine, K. (2016) “Legislating Against Foreign Funding of Human Rights-A Tool of Repression in the
Former Soviet Union”, in A. Hug (ed.), Sharing Worst Practice: How Countries and Institutions in
the Former Soviet Union Help Create Legal Tools of Repression, London: The Foreign Policy Centre,
28-32.
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan Education.
Makinen, S. (2016) “In Search of the Status of an Educational Great Power? Analysis of Russia’s Educational
Diplomacy Discourse”, Problems of Post-Communism, 63(3): 183-196.
Moscow Expected to Send 30 Russian Language Teachers to Tajikistan Soon. (2016, November 25). Asia-
Plus.
Nye, J. S. (1990) “The Changing Nature of World Power”, Political Science Quarterly, 105(2): 177-192.
Nye, J. S. (2002) “The Information Revolution and American Soft Power”, Asia-Pacific Review, 9(1): 60-76.
Nye, J. S. (2004) Soft Power : The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.
Orazgaliyeva, M. (2017, July 18). CSTO Foreign Ministers Adopt Measures to Curb IT Crime during Minsk
Meeting. The Astana Times.
OSCE (2014). Republic of Tajikistan Presidential Election, 6 November 2013: OSCE/ODIHR Election
Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE.
OSCE (2015a). Republic of Kazakhstan Early Presidential Election, 26 April 2015: OSCE/ODIHR Election
Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE.
OSCE (2015b). Republic of Tajikistan Parliamentary Elections, 1 March 2015: Election Observation Mission
Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE.
OSCE (2017a). Republic of Uzbekistan Early Presidential Election, 4 December 2016: OSCE/ODIHR Election
Observation Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE.
OSCE (2017b). Turkmenistan Presidential Election, 12 February 2017: OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment
Mission Final Report. Warsaw: OSCE.
Popescu, N. (2006), “Russia’s Soft Power Ambitions”, CEPS Policy Brief, (115): 1-3.
President of Russia (2002). Charter of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. http://en.kremlin.ru/
supplement/3506 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
President of Russia (2005). Introductory Remarks at a Meeting of the Council for Facilitating the
Development of Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/
president/transcripts/23097. (Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2017).
President of Russia (2011). Visit to the Alexander Pushkin State Russian Language Institute. http://
en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/11484 (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
President of Russia (2012). Meeting with Russian Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives in
International Organisations. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/page/330 (Erişim Tarihi:
03.12.2017).
President of Russia (2014). State Council Presidium Meeting on Family, Motherhood and Childhood Policy.
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20265 (Erişim Tarihi: 24.12.2017).
President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2016). Meeting of the National Commission for Women Affairs,
Family and Demographic Policy under the President of Kazakhstan Chaired by Kazakhstan’s
Secretary of State Gulshara Abdykalikova. http://www.akorda.kz/en/special/events/astana_
kazakhstan/astana_other_events/meeting-of-the-national-commission-for-women-affairs-familyand-
demographic-policy-under-the-president-of-kazakhstan-chaired-by-kazakhstans (Erişim
Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
President of the Republic of Tajikistan (2017). Meeting with President of Russian Federation Vladimir
Putin. http://president.tj/en/node/16378 (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
Putin Approves Major International Agreement Targeting Cyber-Crime. (2017, August 28). Russia Today.
Richter, A., A. Richter (2015) Regulation of Online Content in the Russian Federation, Strasbourg: European
Audiovisual Observatory.
Richter, J. (2009) “Putin and the Public Chamber”, Post-Soviet Affairs, 25(1): 39-65.
Roberts, S. P. (2015) “Converging Party Systems in Russia and Central Asia: A Case of Authoritarian Norm
Diffusion?”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48: 147-157.
Rossotrudichestvo (2018a). About Rossotrudichestvo. http://rs-gov.ru/en/about (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
Rossotrudichestvo (2018b). Consolidation of the Russian Language. http://rs-gov.ru/en/activities/9 (Erişim
Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
Rossotrudichestvo (2018c). Joint Alumni Day. http://rs-gov.ru/en/activities/10/projects/21 (Erişim Tarihi:
28.01.2018).
Rotaru, V. (2017) “Forced Attraction ? How Russia Is Instrumentalizing Its Soft Power Sources in the Near
Abroad”, Problems of Post-Communism, 65(1): 37-48.
Russian Film About Disputed Wartime Action Wins Putin’s Support. (2016, October 11). The Guardian.
Russkiy Mir Foundation (2018). About Russkiy Mir Foundation. https://russkiymir.ru/en/fund/index.php
(Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (2005). Declaration by the Heads of the Member States of the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization, Astana, July 5, 2005. file:///C:/Users/Asl%C4%B1/Downloads/
Declaration_by_the_heads_of_the_member_states_of_the_SCO%20(2).pdf (Erişim Tarihi:
21.01.2018).
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (2009). Agreement on Cooperation in Ensuring International
Information Security between the Member States of the Shanghai Cooperation, June 16, 2009.
http://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=28340 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (2012). Declaration by the Heads of Member States of the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization on Building a Region of Lasting Peace and Common Prosperity, Beijing,
June 7, 2012. file:///C:/Users/Asl%C4%B1/Downloads/Beijing_Declaration_By_the_Heads_
of_Member_States_of_the_SCO_on_Building_a_Region_of_Lasting_Peace_and_Common_
Prosperity.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (2017). Statement by the SCO Observer Mission on Monitoring
Preparations for and the Election of the President of Turkmenistan on 12 February 2017. http://eng.
sectsco.org/news/20170213/216066.html (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
Shapovalova, N. (2015). Security Certificate of the Republic of Kazakhstan: The State Will Be Able to Control
the Encrypted Internet Traffic of Users. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=1c0087b4-
026e-45f8-aba1-8592a0516468 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
Sharafutdinova, G. (2014) “The Pussy Riot Affair and Putin’s Démarche from Sovereign Democracy to
Sovereign Morality”, Nationalities Papers, 42(4): 615-621.
Surkov, V. (2009) “Commentaries on the Discussion of ‘Paragraphs pro Sovereign Democracy’”, Russian
Studies in Philosophy, 47(4): 85-96.
Suslov, M. (2017) “Framing and Foreign Policy: Russian Media Control and Human Rights” in D. Lettinga
and L. Von Troost (Eds.), Shifting Power and Human Rights Diplomacy-Russia, Amsterdam: Amnesty
International, 65-74.
The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (2017). Civic Freedom Monitor: Turkmenistan. http://
www.icnl.org/research/monitor/turkmenistan.html (Erişim Tarihi: 06.01.2018).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2007). Summary of a Speech by Russian Minister
of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov at the Sources and Traditions of Russian Diplomacy Conference,
Moscow, March 24, 2007. http://www.mid.ru/en/web/guest/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/
cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/378092 (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2013). Concept of the Foreign Policy of the
Russian Federation. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/
CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/122186 (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2016a). Foreign Policy Concept of the
Russian Federation. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/
CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248 (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2017).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2016b). Speech by Russian Foreign Ministry
Commissioner for Human Rights, Democracy and Rule of Law Konstantin Dolgov at a Meeting of
the Presidential Coordinating Council for Implementing the 2012-2017 National Action Strategy
for Children on the Subject, Children as Actors in Implementing the National Strategy. http://www.
mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2298157 (Erişim
Tarihi: 24.12.2017).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2016c). Russia’s Role in Mobilizing Efforts
to Respond to the Challenge of International Terrorism and Extremism and in Countering New
Challenges and Threats. http://www.mid.ru/en/diverse/-/asset_publisher/zwI2FuDbhJx9/content/
novye-vyzovy-i-ugrozy?_101_INSTANCE_zwI2FuDbhJx9_redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
mid.ru%2Fen%2Fdiverse%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_zwI2FuDbhJx9%26p_p_
lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-
1%26p_p_col_pos%3D2%26p_p_col_count%3D5 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2016d). Article by State Secretary and Deputy
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Grigory Karasin ‘Returning to the Idea of Soft Power’
Published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta on June 14, 2016. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/
asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2318454 (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2017a). Press Release on a Meeting of the CIS
Council of Foreign Ministers. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/
cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2894832 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2017b). Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s
Interview with the Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn Magazine Published on March 15, 2017. http://www.
mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2680435 (Erişim
Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
The Russian Government (2015). The Russian Language Federal Targeted Programme for 2016−2020.
http://government.ru/en/docs/18169/ (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2018).
Tokaev, K. (2007) “Kazakhstan in the Contemporary World”, International Affairs: A Russian Journal of
World Politics, Diplomacy and International Relations, 53(1): 101-106.
Tursunzoda, M. (2012, October 2). Week of Russian Language and Literature Held in Three Tajik Cities.
Asia-Plus.
UN General Assembly (2015). Letter Dated 9 January 2015 from the Permanent Representatives of China,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations
Addressed to the Secretary-General. https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/documents/UN-150113-
CodeOfConduct.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.01.2018).
Wilson, J. L. (2015) “Soft Power: A Comparison of Discourse and Practice in Russia and China”, Europe-Asia
Studies, 67 (8): 1171-1202.
Ziegler, C. E. (2016) “Great Powers, Civil Society and Authoritarian Diffusion in Central Asia”, Central Asian
Survey, 35(4): 549-569.