TÜRKİYE’DE İŞ KAZALARI VE ÜCRET FARKLARI

Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı’nın iş kazaları ve Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketleri ücret verilerini kullanarak, Türkiye’deki imalat sanayi için telafi edici ücret farkları hipotezini 2013-2017 dönemi için test ediyoruz. İlk olarak, ölümcül ve ölümcül olmayan kaza riski için standart bir hedonik ücret denklemi tahmin ediyoruz. Standart telafi edici ücret farkları hipotezine uygun olarak, mesleki riskler ve ücret arasında pozitif bir ilişki buluyoruz, ancak endüstri etkilerini kontrol ettikten sonra ilişki önemsiz hale geliyor. Alternatif bir tahmin olarak, iki aşamalı bir prosedür kullanıyoruz. Riskin anlamsız ve negatif bir etkisinin yanı sıra, erkek nüfusu için kötü çalışma koşullarının düşük ücretlerle ilişkilendirilmesi bölünmüş bir işgücü piyasasına işaret etmektedir

OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND WAGE DIFFERENTIALS IN TURKEY

We test the compensating wage differentials hypothesis for the manufacturing industry in Turkeyusing occupational injury data from the Ministry of Labor and Social Security and wage data fromHousehold Labor Force Surveys, for the 2013-2017 period. First, we estimate a standard hedonic wageequation for the fatal and non-fatal injury risk. In conformity with the standard CWD hypothesis wefind a positive relation between occupational risks and wage however after controlling for industryeffects, the relation becomes insignificant. For an alternative estimation, we use a two-step procedure.Besides an insignificant and negative effect of risk, poor working conditions are associated with lowerwages for the male population, which suggest a segmented labor market.

___

  • BİLİR, N. (2016). Occupational Safety and Health Profile: Turkey. ILO.
  • BRYAN, M. L. and Jenkins, S. P. (2016). Multilevel modelling of cou ntry effects: a cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32(1):3-22.
  • EUROFOUND. European Working Conditions Surveys. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/europeanworking-conditions-survey
  • EUROPEAN UNION (2012) European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW). Summary methodology. Eurostat Methodologies and Working papers.
  • GUARDADO, J. R., and Ziebarth, N. R. (2019). Worker investments in safety, workplace accidents, and compensating wage differentials. International Economic Review, 60(1):133-155.
  • HAMALAINEN, P. (2009). The effect of globalization on occupational accidents. Safety Science, 47(6):733- 742.
  • HAMALAINEN, P., Leena Saarela, K., and Takala, J. (2009). Global trend according to estimated number of occupational accidents and fatal work-related diseases at region and country level. Journal of Safety Research, 40(2):125-139.
  • HANUSHEK, E. A. (1974). Efficient estimators for regressing regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 28(2):66-67.
  • HINTERMANN, B., Alberini, A., and Markandya, A. (2010). Estimating the value of safety with labour market data: are the results trustworthy? Applied Economics, 42(9):1085 – 1100.
  • HWANG, H.-S., Reed, W. R., and Hubbard, C. (1992). Compensating wage differentials and unobserved productivity. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4):835-858.
  • ILOSTAT – “Safety and health at work” statistics, https://www.ilo.org/ilostat/
  • KIM, S.-W. and Fishback, P. V. (1999). The impact of institutional change on compensating wage differentials for accident risk: South korea, 1984-1990. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18(3):231-248.
  • KOCHI, I. (2011). Endogeneity and estimates of the value of a statistical life. Environmental Economics, 2(4):17-31.
  • KRUEGER, A. B. and Summers, L. H. (1988). Efficiency wages and the inter-industry wage structure. Econometrica. Journal of the Econometric Society, 259-293.
  • LEIGH, J. P. (1995). Compensating wages, value of a statistical life, and inter-industry differentials. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1):83-97.
  • MESSENGER, J. C. (2011). Working time trends and developments in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(2):295-316.
  • MESSENGER, J. C., Lee, S., and McCann, D. (2007). Working time around the world: Trends in working hours, laws, and policies in a global comparative perspective. Routledge.
  • MORANTZ, A. (2011). Does unionization strengthen regulatory enforcement-an empirical study of the mine safety and health administration. NYDJ Jegis. & Pub. Pol’y, 14:697.
  • OECD (2006). Society at a Glance. OECD Social lndicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • POLAT, S. (2014). Wage compensation for risk: The case of Turkey. Safety Science, 70:153-160.
  • POLAT, S. and Ulus, M. (2014). Hours worked, wages and productivity. Mimeo, Department of Economics, Galatasaray University.
  • ROSEN, S. (1986). The theory of equalizing differences. Handbook of Labor economics, 1:641-692.
  • SAXONHOUSE, G. R. (1976). Estimated parameters as dependent variables. The American Economic Review, 66(1):178-183.
  • TOKSÖZ, G. (2008). Decent work country report – Turkey. International Labour Organization. VISCUSI, W. K. and Aldy J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1):5-76. WORLD BANK. Doing Business Index. http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/employingworkers