M. Zafer GÖREN, Berrak Ç. YEĞEN, Dilek ÖZBEYLİ, Arif GÜMÜŞ

A five-year follow-up of animal use at Marmara University school of medicine

Objective: To improve the standards of animal welfare, as well as scientific quality, good education and training is necessary for implementing reductions, refinements and replacement alternatives (3Rs). Ethical justification of laboratory animal use by our institutional committee has served to achieve a greater acceptance of the concept of humane experimental techniques. Methods: In this retrospective study, a five year follow-up of data collected within Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee was evaluated. Results: Our results show that reviewing the protocols and giving feedback to researchers has an educational value in improving the skills and attitude of persons involved in the design and performance of animal experiments. Conclusion: Therefore, while giving education or training, the use of laboratory animals should be reviewed thoroughly, not only for the application of the 3Rs but also for further education of those involved in or responsible for animal use.

PDF

___

1. The Hew York Academy of Sciences. Interdisciplinary Principles on Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research, Testing and Education. 1988; 1-13. 2. Rowan An. Formulation of ethical standards for use of animals in medical research. Toxicol Lett 1993; 68: 63-71. 3. The American Physiological Society. Questions people ask about animals in research, Maryland, USA. 4. Biomedical Research Education Trust. Information about Animal Research, London. 5. Russell W M S, Burch R L. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Metheun, 1959, reissued 1992 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Hertfordshire, UK. 6. national Research Council Quide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC, USA: national Academy Press, 1996: 1- 20. 7. Townsed P. Control of pain and distress in small laboratory animals. Anim Tech 1993; 44: 215-223. 8. European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods Workshop Report 11. The three Rs: the way forward. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 1995; 23: 833-866. 9. van Zupthen L F M. Refinement, the Cindrella of the 3Rs. In: D'Donoghue P n, ed. The Ethics of Animal Experimentation, norfolk, UK: Page Bros, 1998: 143-150.