Kompleks Mitral Kapak Patolojilerin Onarımı; Uğraşmaya Değer mi?

Giriş: Ventrikül fonksiyonun korunması, daha az cerrahi mortaliteye sahip olması, üstün uzun dönem survey ve antikoagülan kullanımının önlenmesi gibi üstünlükleri nedeniyle mitral kapak onarımı replasmana daha çok tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kompleks mitral kapak patolojilerin onarım teknikleri ve sonuçları sunmaktır. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Retrospektif olarak kompleks mitral kapak patolojilerin onarımı geçiren 56 hasta incelendi (ortalama yaş 41.8 ± 16.5 yıl; 33 erkek). Kırk dört hastada saf mitral yetmezliği varken, 12 (%21.4) hastada miks mitral kapak hastalığı (mitral darlığı + mitral yetmezliği) vardı. Preoperatif ve operatif özellikleri, postoperatif mitral yetmezliği derecesi, cerrahi mortalite ve orta dönem sonuçları her hasta için araştırıldı. Bulgular: Postoperatif düşük kardiyak debi sendromuna bağlı bir hastada erken mortalite (30 gün mortalite: %1.8) görüldü. Mitral kapak onarımı ameliyatı olan bütün hastalarda mitral onarım prosedürleri başarılı olmuştur. Hastalar taburcu olduğunda yapılan ekokardiyografik değerlendirmede %74.6’sında hiç/eser yetersizlik ve %21.8’inde hafif yetersizlik saptandı. 55 hastada geç dönem takibi yapıldı. Hastalarımızın ortalama takip süresi 47.9 ± 23.1 aydı. Geç mortalite mitral kapak onarımından 3 yıl sonra akut aort diseksiyonu nedeniyle ameliyata alınan marfan sendromlu bir hastada gözlendi. Takipler sırasında yapılan ekokardiyografik değerlendirmede hastaların %90.7 (49 hasta)’sinde  hiç ya da hafif yetersizlik gözlendi. Orta yetersizlik gözlenen 4 (%7.4) hastada tıbbi tedavi uygulandı. İleri yetersizlik gözlenen 1 (%1.9) hastada reoperasyon uygulandı. Sonuç: Çalışmamız kompleks mitral kapak patolojilerin onarımının sonuçları mükemmel olduğunu gösterdi. Kompleks mitral kapak patolojilerin onarım teknikleri güvenli ve sonuçları son derece etkindir, fakat ameliyatlarda yeterli cerrahi tecrübe gereklidir.

Repair of Complex Mitral Valve Pathologies: Is It Worth to Cope With?

Introduction: Mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement for its benefits of preservation of ventricular function, lower operative mortality, superior long-term survival, and avoidance of anticoagulation. In this study, we aimed to review the repair techniques of complex MV pathologies and their outcomes. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients (mean age 41.8 ± 16.5 years; 33 males) who underwent repair of complex MV pathologies. 44 patients had pure mitral regurgitation (MR), and 12 (21.4%) had mixed mitral disease (mitral stenosis (MS) + MR). Preoperative and operative characteristics, postoperative MR severity, operative mortality, and midterm survival were examined for each patient. Results: There was only one early death (30-day mortality: 1.8%) due to postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. The procedures were successful in all patients who underwent MV repair. Transthoracic echocardiography examinations revealed no/trivial MR in 74.6% and mild MR in 21.8% of patients at discharge. Late follow-up was obtained in 55 patients. The mean follow-up period of patients was 47.9 ± 23.1 months. Mortality developed in one (1.8%) patient with Marfan syndrome who had acute aortic dissection three years after MV surgery. During follow-up visits, mitral repair procedures were successful in 49 (90.7%) patients. Four (7.4%) patients presented with moderate MR. Only one (1.9%) patient needed reoperation because of severe MR. Conclusion: This study showed that repair of complex MV pathologies provides excellent surgical outcomes. Repair of complex MV pathologies is safe and highly effective, but operations require considerable surgical experience.

___

  • 1. Ren JF, Askut S, Lightly GW Jr, Vigilante GJ, Sink JD, Segal BL, et al. Mitral valve repair is superior to valve replacement for early preservation of cardiac function: relation of ventricular geometry to function. Am Heart J 1996;131:974-81.
  • 2. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Sundt TM 3rd, Daly RC, Mullany CJ, et al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:819-26.
  • 3. Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation 1995;91:1022-8.
  • 4. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z, Daniel L. Late results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation due to degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:7-12; discussion 13-4.
  • 5. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, Diaz R, Arnold JH, Lytle BW, et al. Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:734-43.
  • 6. Korkmaz AA, Onan B, Demir AS, Tarakçı S, Gündoğdu R, Akdemir I, et al. Clinical outcomes of mitral valve repair in mitral regurgitation: a prospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients. Anadolu Kardiol Derg 2011;11:542-50.
  • 7. Onan B, Erkanlı K, Onan IS, Ersoy B, Aktürk IF, Bakır I. Clinical outcomes of mitral valve repair, a single center experience in 100 patients. Türk Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 2014;22:19-28.
  • 8. Cosgrove DM, Steward WJ. Mitral valvuloplasty. Current Probl Cardiol 1989;14:359-415.
  • 9. Yau TM, Ei-Ghoneimi YA, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, David TE. Mitral valve repair and replacement in rheumatic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:53-60.
  • 10. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie D, Rakowski H. A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1242-9.
  • 11. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery-the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:323-37.
  • 12. Duran CG, Revuelta JM, Gaite L, Alonso C, Fleitas MG. Stability of mitral reconstruction surgery at 10-12 years for predominantly rheumatic valvular disease. Circulation 1988;78:91-6.
  • 13. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;42:S1-44.
  • 14. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chaterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2008;118:e523-661.
  • 15. Adams DH, Anyanwu AC, Rahmanian PB, Filsoufi F. Current concepts in mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. Heart Fail Rev 2006;11: 241-57.
  • 16. Kumar AS, Rao PN, Saxena A. Results of mitral valve reconstruction in children with rheumatic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1044-7.
  • 17. Erez E, Kanter KR, Isom E, Williams WH, Tam VK. Mitral valve replacement in children. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:25-9.
  • 18. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Forty-years survival with the Starr-Edwards heart valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:91-6.
  • 19. Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, Abdallah F, Celestin JA, Meimoun P, et al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier’s techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001;104:8-11.
  • 20. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Alaulaqi A, Sabik JF, Mihaljevic T, Svensson LG, et al. Outcomes after repair of the anterior mitral leaflet for degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:708-17.
  • 21. Kasegawa H, Shimokawa T, Shibazaki I, Koyanagi T, Ida T. Mitral valve repair for anterior leaflet prolapse with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1625-31.
  • 22. Chauvaud S, Jebara V, Chachques JC, El Asmar B, Mihaileanu S, Perier P, et al. Valve extension with glutaraldehyde-preserved autologous pericardium: results inmitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:171-8.
  • 23. Chauvaud S, Fuzellier JF, Berrebi A, Deloche A, Fabiani JN, Carpentier A. Long term (29 years) results of reconstructive surgery in rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001;104(Suppl I):I-12-5.
  • 24. Zakkar M, Amirak E, John Chan KM, Punjabi PP. Rheumatic mitral valve disease: current surgical status. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009;51:478-81.
  • 25. Dillon J, Yakub MA, Nordin MN, Pau KK, Krishna Moorthy PS. Leaflet extension in rheumatic mitral valve reconstruction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:682-9.
  • 26. Kadoba K, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Castaneda AR. Mitral valve replacement in the first year of life. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:762-8.
  • 27. Carpentier A, Branchini B, Cour JC, Asfaou E, Villani M, Deloche A, et al. Congenital malformations of the mitral valve in children. Pathology and surgical treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;72:854-8.
  • 28. Murakami T, Yagihara T, Yamamoto F, Uemura H, Yamashita K, Ishizaka T. Artificial chordae for mitral valve reconstruction in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1377-80.
  • 29. Kawahira Y, Yagihara T, Uemura H, Ishizaka H, Yoshizumi K, Kitamura S.Use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures as artificial tendinous cords in children with congenital mitral regurgitation. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 1999:15:289-293.
  • 30. Okita Y, Miki S, Kusuhara K, Ueda Y, Tahata T, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Early and late results of reconstructive operation for congenital mitral regurgitation in pediatric age group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1988;96:294-8.
  • 31. Grigg LE, Wigle ED, Williams WG, Daniel LB, Rakowski H. Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clarification of pathophysiology and importance in intraoperative decision making. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:42-52.
  • 32. Van der Lee C, Kofflard MJM, van Herwerden LA, Vletter WB, ten Cate FJ. et al. Sustained improvement after combined anterior mitral leaflet extension and myectomy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2003;108:2088-92.
Koşuyolu Heart Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-2972
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1990
  • Yayıncı: Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Kartal Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Transkateter Aort Kapak İmplantasyonuna (TAVI) Anestezi Yaklaşımı

Hülya YILMAZ AK

Mekanik Ventilasyona Pratik Yaklaşım

Hülya YILMAZ AK, Mustafa YILDIZ

Koroner Arter Baypas Operasyonu Olan Olgularda Kapaklı Kapaksız Safen Ven ve Radiyal Arter Açıklığının Tomografi ile Araştırılması

Mehmet ÖZÜLKÜ, Fatih AYGÜN, Bilal Egemen ÇİFTÇİ

İzole CABG Operasyonlarında Aralıklı Antegrad ile Tek Doz Antegrad Sonrası Devamlı Retrograd İzotermik Kan Kardiyopleji Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması

Babürhan ÖZBEK, Mehmet Erdem TOKER

Venöz Kanül Hattı Kullanılarak Medyan Sternotominin Mekanik Komplikasyonlarının Engellenmesi

Serkan KETENCİLER, Kamil BOYACIOĞLU, İlknur AKDEMİR, Nihan KAYALAR

Konjenital Kardiyak Cerrahi Sonrası Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Takip Edilen 7 Gün ile 16 Yaş Aralığındaki Hastalarda Troponin I Seviyelerinin Postoperatif Mortalite ve Morbidite ile İlişkisi

Hülya YILMAZ AK, Mustafa YILDIZ, Nurgül YURTSEVEN, Deniz ÖZSOY, Doğaç OKŞEN, Hakkı Kürşat ÇETİN

Üçüncü Basamak Bir Merkezden Kardiyak Arrest Serisi

Çetin GEÇMEN, Muzaffer KAHYAOĞLU, Arzu KALAYCI, Abdulrahman NASER, Özge AKGÜN, Özkan CANDAN, Ahmet GÜNER, Mehmet ÇELİK, Can Yücel KARABAY, Akın İZGİ, Cevat KIRMA

Açık Kalp Cerrahisinde, Pompanın Erken Postoperatif Mortalite ve Serebrovasküler Olay Üzerine Etkisi

Fatih AYGÜN, Mehmet ÖZÜLKÜ

Akut Karotis Stent Trombozunda Başarılı Sandviç Tekniği Olgusu

Abdullah İÇLİ, Ahmet Lütfü SERTDEMİR, Kurtuluş ÖZDEMİR

Akut Bacak İskemisinin Hibrit Yaklaşımla Başarılı Tedavisi

Ahmet GÜNER, Anıl Avcı, Mehmet AKSÜT