Preoperatif Stentin Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahi Sonuçları Üzerine Etkisi

Amaç: Retrograd intrarenal cerrahi genellikle 10-20 mm boyutunda üreteral ve renal taşların tedavisinde endikedir. Bazen primer retrograd endoskopi mümkün olmayabilir. Bu durumlarda prestent uygulaması üreteroskop veya üreteral akses kılıfın geçişini kolaylaştırabilir. Bu çalışmada, preoperatif üreter stent uygulamasının, retrograd endoskopik taş cerrahisi sonuçları üzerine etkisi değerlendirilmiştir.

IMPACT OF PREOPERATIVE STENT ON RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY OUTCOMES

Objective: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is commonly indicated for the treatment of 10-20 mm ureteral and renal stones. Sometimes, primary retrograde endoscopy is not possible. Pre-stenting may facilitate passage of ureteroscope or ureteral access sheath in these cases. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes of retrograde endoscopic stone surgery. 

___

  • 1. Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Geraghty R, Skolarikos A, Papatsoris A, Liatsikos E et al. Trends of 'urolithiasis: interventions, simulation, and laser technology' over the last 16 years (2000-2015) as published in the literature (PubMed): a systematic review from European section of Uro-technology (ESUT). World J Urol. 2017;35(11):1651-58.
  • 2. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M et al EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–82.
  • 3. Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S, Shore DM, Nadler RB. Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol. 2007;21(11):1277-80.
  • 4. Traxer O and Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-4.
  • 5. Benoit L, Spie R, Favoulet P, Cheynel N, Kretz B, Gouy S et al. Management of ureteral injuries. Ann Chir. 2005;130(8):451-7.
  • 6. Pereira BM, Ogilvie MP, Gomez-Rodriguez JC, Ryan ML, Pena D, Marttos AC et al. A review of ureteral injuries after external trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:6. Doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-6.
  • 7. Lee MH, Lee IJ, Kim TJ, Lee SC, Jeong CW, Hong SK et al. The effect of short-term preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. World J Urol. 2019;37(7):1435-40.
  • 8. Hubert KC, Palmer JS. Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. J Urol. 2005;174(3):1079-80.
  • 9. Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O, Grainger R, McDermott TE, Butler MR. Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol. 1990;66(3):254-6.
  • 10. Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD. Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):751-4.
  • 11. Perlmutter AE, Talug C, Tarry WF, Zaslau S, Mohseni H, Kandzari SJ. Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2007;71(2):214–17.
  • 12. Zhang J, Xu C, He D, Lu Y, Hu H, Qin B et al. Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2728.
  • 13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.
  • 14. Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ. Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology. 2012;80(6):1214-9.
  • 15. Ather MH, Paryani J, Memon A, Sulaiman MN. A 10-year experience of managing ureteric calculi: changing trends towards endourological intervention-is there a role for open surgery? BJU Int. 2001;88(3):173-7.
  • 16. Auge BK, Sarvis JA, L’Esperance JO, Preminger GM. Practice patterns of ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: a survey of practice urologists. J Endourol. 2007;21(11):1287-91.
  • 17. Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R, Gomez-Marin O. Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2768-74.
  • 18. Lumma, PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, Plothe KD, Thelen P, Ringert RH et al. Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol. 2013;31(4):855-9.
  • 19. Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M et al. Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int. 2016;117(4):648-54.
  • 20. Jessen JP, Breda A, Brehmer M, Liatsikos EN, Millan Rodriguez F, Osther PJ et al. International collaboration in endourology: Multicenter evaluation of prestenting for ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):268-73.
  • 21. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. 2018. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Urolithiasis-2018-large-text.pdf.
  • 22. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde ıntrarenal surgery: The “resorlu-unsal stone score”. Urology. 2012;80(3):512-8.
  • 23. Tonyalı S, Yılmaz M, Karaaslan M, Ceylan C, Işıkay L. Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Turk J Urol. 2018;44(6):473-7.
Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-9645
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1999
  • Yayıncı: KIRIKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ KÜTÜPHANE VE DOKÜMANTASYON BAŞKANLIĞI
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ÜST ENDOSKOPİDE YABANCI CİSİM SAPTANAN HASTALARIN ANALİZİ: DOĞU KARADENİZDE TEK MERKEZLİ RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

Müge USTAOĞLU, Zehra Betül PAKÖZ

Drenden Ölçülen Amilaz Değerleri Acil Splenektomi Sonrası İyatrojenik Pankreas Yaralanmasına Sekonder Pankreatik Fistül Gelişimini Öngörmede Faydalı mıdır?

Alp YILDIZ, Aybala YILDIZ

YUMURTA AKININ PIA, ARAKNOID VE DURA TAMİRİNDE KULLANIMI; DENEYSEL ÇALIŞMA

Adnan ALTUN, Cengiz ÇOKLUK

AMELOBLASTOMA VE ODONTOJENİK KERATOKİSTLERİN KLİNİK VE RADYOLOJİK DAVRANIŞI: VAKA SERİLERİYLE BİRLİKTE LİTERATÜR TARTIŞMASI

Melda MISIRLIOĞLU, Zahide MEŞHUR, Yağmur YILMAZ AKYIL

ÇOCUKLARDA KRONİK KARACİĞER HASTALIKLARINA YAKLAŞIM

Burcu GÜVEN

Nöral Tüp Defektlerinde Duyarlılık Oluşturan Risk Faktörleri Olarak Faktör V ve MTHFR Genlerinin Analizi: Türkiye'den Bir Vaka-Kontrol Çalışması

İbrahim Halil YILDIRIM, Kağan KAMAŞAK, Zeynep YEĞİN

AKUT KORONER SENDROMDA SERUM FİBRİNOJEN DÜZEYİ İLE STENT RESTENOZU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Muhammed KARADENİZ, Taner SARAK

Preoperatif Stentin Retrograd İntrarenal Cerrahi Sonuçları Üzerine Etkisi

Ünal ÖZTEKİN, Mehmet CANİKLİOĞLU, Sercan SARI, Abdullah GÜREL, Volkan SELMİ, Levent IŞIKAY, Fatih ATAÇ

Renal Hücreli Karsinomda Prognostik Belirteçler Olarak CD44 ve Ki-67 Birlikteliği

Tuba DEVRİM, Mahi BALCI

DENETİMLİ SERBESTLİK UYGULAMASI KAPSAMINDA ADIYAMAN İLİNDE YAPILAN BAŞVURULARIN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ: 2017 VE 2018 YILI VERİLERİ

Oğuzhan Bekir EĞİLMEZ, Mehmet Hamdi ÖRÜM, Ebru DUMLUPINAR