Sosyotelizm ile Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler

Çalışmanın amacı: Bireyi diğerlerinden ayıran kişilik özellikleri bireyin davranışlarının en önemli sebeplerinden biri olarakgösterilebilir. Bu araştırmada sosyotelizm ve kişilik özellikleri (dışa dönüklük, yumuşak başlılık, sorumluluk, nevrotizm vedeneyime açıklık) arasındaki ilişkiye bakılarak kişilik özelliklerinin sosyotelizm üzerindeki yordayıcı etkisini saptamakamaçlanmıştır.Materyal ve Yöntem: Araştırmanın çalışma grubu Türkiye’nin farklı illerinde yaşayan 1186 [ Kadın: 642 (%54.1), Erkek:544 (%45.9)] katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada basit tesadüfi örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların yaşları 15-70 (Ort ±ss = 31.24 ± 11.38) arasında değişmektedir. Araştırmanın verileri Sosyotelizm Ölçeği, Sıfatlara Dayalı Kişilik Testi ve kişisel bilgiformu kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinde betimsel istatistikler, t testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi (Anova),Pearson korelasyonu ve hiyerarşik regresyon kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre sosyotelizm ile dışadönüklük arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin olmadığısaptanmıştır. Sosyotelizmle nevrotizm ve deneyime açıklık arasında anlamlı pozitif bir ilişki saptanırken; sosyotelizmle yumuşakbaşlılık ve sorumluluk arasında anlamlı negatif bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Yapılan ön analize göre cinsiyet sosyotelizm puanlarınıanlamlı farklılaştırmazken; medeni durum, eğitim düzeyi ve yaş sosyotelizm puanlarını anlamlı farklılaştırmaktadır. Yapılanhiyerarşik regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre yumuşak başlılık, sorumluluk, nevrotizm ve deneyime açıklığın sosyotelizmin yordayıcıları olduğu saptanmıştır.Önemli Vurgular: Kişilik özellikleri, phubbing davranışını anlamak için ele alınması gereken önemli bir faktördür. Araştırmabulguları alan yazın açısından tartışılarak önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Relationships Between Phubbing and The Five Factor Personality Traits

Purpose: Personality traits that distinguish the individual from others can be shown as one of the most important reasons ofthe individual's behavior. In this study, it was aimed to determine the predictive effect of personality traits on phubbing byconsidering the relationship between phubbing and personality traits (extraversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness,neuroticism, and openness).Design/Methodology/Approach: The study group of the research consisted of 1186 [Female: 642 (54.1%), Male: 544 (45.9%)]individuals living in different provinces of Turkey. Simple random sampling method was used in the study. The ages of theparticipants were range from 15-70 (Mean ± sd = 31.24 ± 11.38). The research data were collected using Phubbing Scale,Adjective Based Personality Test and Personal Information Form. Descriptive statistics, t-test, One-Way Anova, Pearsoncorrelation, and hierarchical regression were used in the analysis of the research data.Findings: According to the findings obtained from the study, there was no significant relationship between phubbing andextraversion. While there was a significant positive relationship between phubbing with neuroticism and openness. There were negative relationships between phubbing with conscientiousness and agreeableness. According to the preliminary analysis,while gender did not differentiate phubbing scores significantly; marital status, educational level and age significantlydifferentiated phubbing scores. According to the results of the hierarchical regression analysis, it has been found thatconscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness were predictors of phubbing.Highlights: Personality traits are an important factor that needs to be addressed in order to understand phubbing behavior. Theresearch findings were discussed in terms of literature and suggestions are made.

___

  • Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., & Hariyani, H. (2019). An analysis of phubbing behaviour: preliminary research from counseling perspective. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 295. Paris, Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.65
  • Aktaş, H., & Yılmaz, N. (2017). Smartphone addiction in terms of the elements of loneliness and shyness of university youth. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(1), 85-100.
  • Al-Saggaf, Y., & MacCulloch, R. (2018). Phubbing: How frequent? Who is phubbed? In which situation? And using which apps? Proceedings of the thirty ninth international conference on information systems (ICIS) (December 13–16), San Francisco, 1–9. AISNET.
  • Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2019). Trait boredom ıs a predictor of phubbing frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 4, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0080-4.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers In Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
  • Bacanlı, H., İlhan, T., & Aslan, S. (2009). Beş faktör kuramına dayalı bir kişilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara dayali kişilik testi (SDKT). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 261-279.
  • Bal, E., ve Balcı, Ş. (2020). Akıllı cep telefonu bağımlılığı: kişilik özellikleri ve kullanım örüntülerinin etkinliği üzerine bir inceleme. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 7(1), 369-394. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.654569
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality dimensions and job performance: A meta Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1- 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  • Barrios-Borjas, D. A., Bejar-Ramos, V. A., & Cauchos-Mora, V. S. (2017). Excessive use of smartphones/cell phones: phubbing and nomofobia. Rev Chil Neuropsiquiatr, 55, 205-206. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92272017000300205.
  • Benvenuti, M., Blachnio, A., Przepiorka, A. M., Daskalova, V. M., & Mazzoni, E. (2020). Factors related to phone snubbing behavior in emerging adults: The phubbing phenomenon. In The psychology and dynamics behind social media interactions (pp. 164-187). IGI Global.
  • Blachnio, A., & Przepiorka, A. (2019). Be aware! If you start using Facebook problematically you will feel lonely: Phubbing, loneliness, self-esteem, and Facebook intrusion. A cross-sectional study. Social Science Computer Review, 37(2), 270-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318754490
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Capraro, V., & Ramírez, E. R. (2018). Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour. Economics Letters, 170, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.022
  • Broadbent, S. (2016). Intimacy at Work: How digital media bring private life to the workplace. New York: Routledge.
  • Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2017). Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers & Education, 106, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009
  • Bulut, M. B., ve Yıldız, M. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özelliklerinin yaşam doyumlarına etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(2), 397-412.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Veri analizi el kitabı (2. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:Pegem Akademi
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö. ve Köklü, N. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (6. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayınevi.
  • Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2011). Relational outcomes of multicom- municating: Integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organization Science, 22, 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0540
  • Chong, C. W., Teh, P. L., & Tan, B. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educational Studies, 40(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.825577
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: the antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone, Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506
  • Çikrikci, Ö., Griffiths, M. D., & Erzen, E. (2019). Testing the mediating role of phubbing in the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and satisfaction with life. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469- 019-00115-z
  • Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375.
  • Dalbudak, E., & Evren, C. (2014). The relationship of internet addiction severity with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder symptomsin Turkish University students; impact of personality traits, depression and anxiety. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(3) 497-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.11.018
  • Davey S, Davey A., & Singh J. V. (2016) Emergence of problematic internet use among Indian adolescents: A multi method study. J Indian Assoc Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(1), 60–78.
  • Demirci, M. K., Özler, D. E., & Girgin, B. (2007). Beş Faktör Kişilik Modelinin İşyerinde Duygusal Tacize (Mobbing) Etkileri: Hastane İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama. Journal of Azerbaijani Studies, 10(3) 13-39.
  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of The Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 21, 417–440.
  • Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008). Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 739–741. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/cpb.2008.0030
  • Erdheim, J., Wang, M., &Zickar, M. J. (2006). Linking The Big Five Personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.005
  • Erzen, E., Odaci, H., & Yeniçeri, İ. (2021). Phubbing: Which personality traits are prone to phubbing?. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 56- 69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319847415
  • Floros, G., & Siomos, K. (2014). Excessive internet use and personality traits. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-014-0006-1
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits, American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.48.1.26
  • Gökdağ, R. (2018). Which one has priority in ınterpersonal communication? Individual or mobile phone. (Ed. Oze, N.). Public relations & communicatıon studies,(9-20). London: IJOPEC Publication.
  • Green, B. S., & Salkınd J.N. (2010). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall Press Upper Saddle River, NJ USA.
  • Guazzini, A., Duradoni, M., Capelli, A., & Meringolo, P. (2019). “An explorative model to assess individuals’ phubbing risk”, Future Internet, 11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11010021
  • Gustavsson, J. P., Jönsson, E. G., Linder, J., &Weinryb, R. M. (2003). The HP5 inventory: definition and assessment of five health-relevant personality traits from a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00142-3
  • Harwood, S., Anglim, J., & Tooley, G. (2015). "Type D Personality and The Five-Factor Model: A Facet-Level Analysis", Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.041
  • Huck, S.W. (2008). Reading statistics and research, 5th Edition. Pearson Educational Inc., Allyn and Bacon: Boston - New York.
  • Işık, M., ve Kaptangil, İ. (2018). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığının sosyal medya kullanımı ve beş faktör kişilik özelliği ile ilişkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerinden bir araştırma. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 7(2), 695-717
  • İbrahimoğlu, N., Ünaldı, İ., Samancıoğlu, M., & Bağlıbel, M. (2013). The relationship between personality traits and learning styles: A cluster analysis. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(3), 93-108.
  • Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Faktör analizi, (Ed. Şeref Kalaycı), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri, Beşinci Baskı, içinde (321-331), Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Karaaziz, M., ve Keskindağ B. (2015). Akıllı telefonumu seviyorum: Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve psikolojik risk faktörleri üzerine gözden geçirme. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 16(2) 78-85.
  • Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Mızrak-Şahin, B., & Babadağ, B. (2016). Sanal dünyanın kronolojik bağımlılığı: Phubbing (phubbing) Addicta. The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3(2), 223-269. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0013
  • Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M. & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(2), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
  • Karahancı, P. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinde akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ile kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Karasar, N. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Karim, N. S. A., Zamzuri, N. H. A., & Nor, Y. M. (2009). Exploring the relationship between Internet ethics in university students and the big five model of personality. Computers ve Education, 53(1), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.001
  • Kayiş, A. R., Satıcı, S. A., Yılmaz, M. F., Şimşek, D., Ceyhan, E., & Bakioǧlu, F. (2016). Big five-personality trait and internet addiction: A metaanalytic review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.012
  • Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Harcourt College Publishers.
  • Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: an integrative review. (In J. D. Houwerand and D. Hermans (Eds), Cognition and emotion: Reviews of current research and theories, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, (s.128- 167). https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802619031
  • Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “Generation y” users. (Research Paper No. 109). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c39/610f9ee13c10176 8b06169153d580605d7ec.pdf
  • Kuss, D. J., Van Rooij, A. J., Shorter, G. W., Griffiths, M. D., & Van de Mheen, D. (2013). Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1987-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.002
  • Lee, M., Murphy, K., & Andrews, G. (2019). Using media while interacting face-to-face is associated with psychosocial well-being and personality traits. Psychological Reports, 122(3), 944-967. https://doi.org/0.1177/0033294118770357
  • Luk, T. T., Wang, M. P., Shen, C., Wan, A., Chau, P. H., Oliffe, J., et al. (2018). Short version of the smartphone addiction scale in chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 1157-1165. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.105
  • Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2015). Psychopathy from a basic trait perspective: The utility of a five-factor model approach. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12132
  • Macquarie Dictionary (2013). Erişim adresi: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/entries/phubbing.html. 20.07.2020 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80058-7
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). The NEO personality inventory: Using the Five-Factor Model in counseling, Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01524.x
  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and ıts applications, Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  • McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). Technoference: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.
  • Merdan, E. (2013). Beş Faktör Kişilik Kuramı ile iş değerleri ilişkisinin incelenmesi: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 7, 141-159.
  • Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies, 68(2), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051 0974.2017.1299024
  • Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iphone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
  • Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (2013). Personality: Theory and research (12th ed.). Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Rand, D.G., Brescoll, V.L., Everett, J.A., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154.
  • Ranie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans' Views on Mobile Etiquette. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.
  • Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics" (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
  • Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners, Computers in Human Behavior.54, 134–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
  • Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021
  • Roberts, J. A., & Pirog III, S. F. (2013). A preliminary investigation of materialism and impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.1.2012.011
  • Rose-Krasnor, L., & Denham, S. (2009). Social-emotional competence in early childhood. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 162–179). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Saucier, G., Tsaousis, I., Georgiades, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The factor structure of greek personality adjectives, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 856- 875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.856
  • Servidio, R. (2014). Exploring the effects of demographic factors, Internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.024
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson
  • Tangmunkongvorakul, A., Musumari, P.M., Thongpibul, K., Srithanaviboonchai, K., Techasrivichien, T., Suguimoto, S. P., & Kihara, M. (2019). Association of excessive smartphone use with psychological well-being among university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand. PloS one, 14(1), e0210294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210294
  • Taş, İ., ve Ayas, T. (2015). Lise öğrencilerinin internet bağımlılık düzeyinin kişilik özellikleriyle ilişkisi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2) 150-162. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v12i1.3279
  • T'ng, S. T., Ho, K. H., & Low, S. K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement invariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 159-190. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2018.3318
  • Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
  • Vanden-Abeele, M. M., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
  • Yıldız-Durak, H. (2019). Investigation of nomophobia and smartphone addiction predictors among adolescents in Turkey: Demographic variables and academic performance. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 492-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.003
  • Zamani, B. E., Abedini, Y., & Kheradmand, A. (2011). Internet addiction based on personality characteristics of high school students in Kerman, Iran. Addiction and Health, 3, 85–91
  • Zhou, Y. Y., Li, D. P., Li, X., Wang, Y. H., & Zhao, L. Y. (2016). Big five personality and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of coping style. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 42-48. https://doi.org/ 10.1916/j.addbeh.2016.08.009
Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-8811
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1992
  • Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Affetmemenin Yordayıcıları Olarak Çocukluk Çağı Travmaları ve Bilişsel Duygu Düzenlemenin İncelenmesi

Uğur Yiğit KARATAŞ, Ahu ARICIOĞLU

Önleyici Sınıf Yönetimi Eğitim Programının Kaynaştırma Uygulaması Yürütülen Sınıflardaki Öğrencilerin Ders Dışı Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Nevin Güner YILDIZ, Esra AKIN, İsmail OKATAN, Turgut BAHÇALI

Okul Psikolojik Danışmanlarının Bilinçli Farkındalık ve Psikolojik İyi Oluşları Arasındaki İlişki: İş-Yaşamı Psikolojik Esnekliğinin Aracılık Etkisi

Yasin AYDIN, Hüseyin Buğra KARAMAN

Öğretmenlerin ve Okul Yöneticilerinin Algılarına Göre Öğretmenlerin Eğitim Örgütlerinde Bencillik Düzeyi

Bilgen KIRAL, Naciye ÇALIŞICI ÇELİK

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Psikolojik İyi Oluş ile Ayrışma-Bireyleşme

İlhan ÇİÇEK

Anne Baba Tutumlarının Özgecilik ile Olan İlişkisinde Empatinin Aracılık Rolü

Abdullah ATLİ, Mustafa ÖZMEN

Üniversitelerin Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitülerindeki Akademik ve İdari Sürecin Değerlendirilmesi

Serap Nur DUMAN, Gürcü ERDAMAR

Covid-19 Salgını ile Ortaya Çıkan Öğrenme Kayıplarının Telafisine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri

Emine AKKAŞ BAYSAL, Gürbüz OCAK

Phubbing (Sosyotelizm) ile Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler

İzzet PARMAKSIZ

Duygu Düzenleme ile Erken Dönem Uyumsuz Şemalar, Bilişsel Esneklik ve Ruminasyon Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

İlhan YALÇIN, Ayşegül ANAYURT