The Effect of Single and Combined Use of probiotic and humatein Quail (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) diet on fatttening performance and carcass parameters

Bu araştırma, bıldırcın rasyonlarına ilave edilen humik asid (Farmagulator XP™) ve probiyotik (Biosacc™)’ın, yalnız veyakombine kullanımının besi performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmada toplam 300adet günlük Japon bıldırcın (Coturnix coturnix japonica) civcivi kullanılmıştır. Her grupta 75 civciv bulunan bir kontrol ve 3deneme grubu oluşturulmuştur. Gruplar kendi aralarında 3’erli alt gruba ayrılmıştır. Deneme beş hafta sürdürülmüştür. Kontrol grubu basal rasyonla beslenmiştir. Deneme grubu rasyonlarına sırasıyla 1 g/kg Farmagulator XP™ (Grup H), 0.5 g/kg Biosacc™ (Grup B) ve 1 g/kg Farmagulator XP™ + 0.5 g/kg Biosacc™ (Grup H+B) kombinasyonu ilave edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda, canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve karkas verimleri bakımından istatistik açıdan önemli bir fark görülmemiştir (P>0.05). Bununla beraber canlı ağırlık değişimleri 4 ve 5. haftalarda Grup H’ de daha yüksek bulunmuştur (P

Bıldırcın rasyonlarına propiyotik ve humik asitin yalnız ve kombine katılmasının besi performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi

This experiment was carried out to determine the both single and combined effects of humates (Farmagulator XPTM) andprobiotics (BiosaccTM) in quail diets on fattening performance and carcass yields. A total of 300 one-day old Japanese Quails(Coturnix coturnix japonica) were used in this experiment. Animals were divided into one control group and three treatmentgroups containing 75 birds each. Each group was further divided into three replicates containing 25 birds each. The experimental period lasted for 35 days. The control group was fed with unsupplemented basal diets. The rations of treatment groups weresupplemented with 1 g/kg Farmagulator XPTM (Group H), 0.5 g/kg BiosaccTM (Group B) and 1 g/kg Farmagulator XPTM + 0.5 g/kg BiosaccTM combination (Group H+B), respectively. At the end of the study there were no statistically signifi cant differences among the groups in terms of body weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and carcass yield (P>0.05). But, bodyweight scores were found higher at the 4th and 5th weeks in the group H (P<0.05). It is concluded that the use of probiotic andhumic acid alone and combination has no additional effect on quail performance.

___

  • 1.Anonim: The effects of humates on crops. htt p://www. organicapproacn.com/humates.htm, 2002. Accessed: 30.10.2009.
  • 2.Faust RH: Humic acids- humates. htt p://www.agrihelp.com/ humates.htm, 1996. Accessed: 22.09.2009.
  • 3.Levinsky BV: All about humate effects and benefi ts. htt p://www. umic.com./, 1997. Accessed: 22.09.2009.
  • 4.Spark KM, Wells JD, Johnson BB: The interaction of a humic acid with heavy metals. Aust J Soil Res, 35, 89-101, 1997.
  • 5.Fedorova LA, Dudinov VM, Levinsky BV: Experimental and commercial application of potassium/sodium humate (Gumat) at State Production Company Fowl Farm Severy. htt p://www.alt. irkutsk.ru/humate/result_e.html, 1998. Accessed: 30.01.2010.
  • 6.Onifade AA, Odunsi AA, Babatunde GM, Olorede BR, Muma E: Comparison of the supplemental eff ects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high-fiber diets fed to broiler chickens. Arch Tierernahr, 52, 29-39, 1999.
  • 7.Bailey CA, White KE, Donke SL: Evaluation of menefee humate on performance of broilers. Poult Sci, 75 (Suppl): 84 (Abstr), 1996.
  • 8.Eren M, Deniz G, Gezen ŞŞ, Türkmen İİ: Broiler yemlerine katılan humatların besi performansı, serum mineral konsantrasyonu ve kemik külü üzerine etkileri. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 47, 275-317, 2000.
  • 9.Karaoğlu M, Macit M, Esenbuga N, Durdag H, Turgut L, Bilgin ÖC: Effect of supplemental humate at different levels on the growth performance, slaughter and carcass traits of broilers. Int J Poult Sci, 3 (6): 406-410, 2004.
  • 10.Kocabağlı N, Alp M, Acar N, Kahraman R: The effects of dietary humate supplementataion on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poultry Sci, 81, 227-230, 2002.
  • 11.Dierck NA: Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: Enzymes and fermentation. Arch Anim Nutr Berl, 39, 241-261, 1989.
  • 12. Yeo J, Kim K: Effect of feeding diets containing an antibioti c, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult Sci, 76, 381-385, 1997.
  • 13. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S: Probiotics in poultry; modes of action. World’s Poult Sci J, 53, 351-368, 1997.
  • 14. Thayer RH, Jackson CD: Improving phytate phosphorus uti lization by poultry with live yeast culture. Okla Agric Exp Stn Res Rep, MP-103, 131-139, 1975.
  • 15. Tonkinson LV, Gleaves EW, Dunkelgod KE, Thayer RH, Sirny RJ, Morrison RD: Fatty acid digestibility in laying hens fed yeast culture. Poult Sci, 44, 159-164, 1965.
  • 16. Savage TF, Nakaue HS, Holmes ZA: Effects of feeding a live yeast culture on market turkey performance and cooked meat characteristics. Nutr Rep Int, 31, 695-703, 1985.
  • 17. Thayer RH, Burkitt RF, Morrison RD, Murray EE: Effi ciency of uti lization of dietary phosphorus by caged turkey breeder hens fed rations supplemented with live yeast culture. Okla Agric Exp Stn Res Rep, MP-103, 173-181, 1978.
  • 18. Savage TF, Mirosh LW: Breeder performance of Medium White turkey hens fed diet containing a 2.5% yeast culture. Poult Sci, 69, 118 (Abstr), 1990.
  • 19. Savage TF, Mirosh LW: The effects of feeding Medium White turkey hens a breeder diet containing a 1.5% yeast culture. Poult Sci Tech, 69, 189 (Abstr), 1990.
  • 20. NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised ed, Natl Acad Press, Washington, 1994.
  • 21. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 16th ed., Arlington, VA, 1996.
  • 22. TSE: Hayvan Yemleri, Metabolik (Çevrilebilir) Enerji Tayini (Kimyasal Metot). TSE No: 9610, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara, 1991.
  • 23. Düzgüneş O, Kesici T, Gürbüz F: İstatisti k Metotları. Ankara Univ Zir Fak, Yayın No: 861, 1983.
  • 24. Shermer CL, Maciorowski KG, Bailey CA, Byers FM, Ricke SC: Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens ŞAHİN, AKSU ELMALI KAYA, SARI, KAYA consuming diets containing a mined humate compound. J Sci Food Agric, 77, 479-486, 1998.
  • 25. Sahin T, Kaya I, Unal Y, Aksu Elmali D: Dietary supplementati on of probiotic and prebioti c combinati on (combiotics) on performance, carcass quality and blood parameters in growing quails. J Anim Vet Adv, 7 (11): 1370-1373, 2008.
  • 26. Savage TF, Mirosh LW: Reproductive performance of turkey breeder hens fed a yeast culture, Proc 25th Annual Pacifi c NW Animal Nutriti on Conf, 6-8 November 1990.
  • 27. Kaya CA, Tuncer ŞD: The Effects of humates on fattening performance, carcass quality and some blood parameters of broilers. J Anim Vet Adv, 8 (1): 94-98, 2009.
  • 28. Yalçın S, Şehu A, Onbaşılar EE, Şahin T: Broiler rasyonlarına humat ve probiyotik ilavesinin performans üzerine etkileri. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 50, 239-244, 2003.
  • 29. Avcı M, Denek N, Kaplan O: Effects of humik asit at diff erent levels on growth perforance, carcass yield and some biochemical parameters of quails. J Anim Vet Adv, 6 (1): 1-4, 2007.
  • 30. Küçükersan S, Küçükersan K, Göncüoğlu E, Şahin T: The effects of dietary humate supplementation on laying hen egg production and egg quality. Indian Vet J, 81, 674-678, 2004.
  • 31. Özçelik H, Yalçın S: Broyler rasyonlarında L-karnitin ve sodyum humat kullanımı. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 51, 63-69, 2004.
  • 32. Ceylan N, Çiftçi İ, İlhan Z: Büyütme faktörü anti biyoti klere alternatif yem katkılarının etlik piliçlerde besi performansı ve bağırsak mikrofl orası üzerine etkileri. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 727733, 2003.
  • 33. Eren M, Deniz G, Biricik H, Gezen ŞŞ, Türkmen İİ, Yavuz HM: Broyler yemlerine zink basitrasin, probiyotik ve mannanoligosakkaritleri katkısının besi performansı üzerine etkileri. Uludağ Univ Vet Fak Derg, 3 (18): 73-85, 1999.
  • 34. Aksu T, Bozkurt AS: Effect of dietary essential oils and / or humic acids on broiler performance, microbial population of intestinal content and antibody titres in the summer season. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15 (2): 185- 190, 2009.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effects of various protein supplementations on In vitro maturation of cat oocytes

Ali Emrah GÜRİŞ, SEMA BİRLER

Production, purification and characterization of the recombinant Brucella abortus rP17 protein

ÖZLEM BÜYÜKTANIR YAŞ, OKTAY GENÇ, Nevzat YURDUSEV

The forecast of the future production amounts of the some fish species being cultivated in Turkey

HÜLYA SAYĞI, AYSUN KOP, Bahar BAYHAN

Çiğ süt pazarlanmasında süt sanayi işletmelerinde firma yoğunlaşma oranlarının araştırılması: Burdur ili örneği

AYTEKİN GÜNLÜ

Vejetasyon döneminin mera kalitesi ile merada otlayan Tuj Irkı koyun ve kuzuların besi performansı üzerine etkisi

SERPİL ADIGÜZEL IŞIK, İSMAİL KAYA

Taze ot, silaj ve kuru ot şeklinde yedirilen yoncanın kuzularda performans, karkas ve etin duyusal özellikler üzerine etkisi

İBRAHİM HALİL ÇERÇİ, ZEKİ ERİŞİR, FUAT GÜRDOĞAN, İSMAİL SEVEN, BAHRİ PATIR, ABDULLAH DİKİCİ, Ünal KILINÇ, MEHMET ÇİFTÇİ

Conjunctiva associated lymphoid tissue in the ostrich (Struthio camelus)

ALEV GÜROL BAYRAKTAROĞLU, DENİZ KORKMAZ, Resat Nuri ASTI, NEVİN KURTDEDE, HİKMET ALTUNAY

Türkiye’de manda yetiştiriciliği'nin önemi

SAVAŞ SARIÖZKAN

Relationship between udder measurements and the linear scores for udder morphology traits in Kıvırcık, Tahirova and Karacabey Merino ewes

ŞENİZ ÖZİŞ ALTINÇEKİÇ, MEHMET KOYUNCU

Determining scientific performance of some of Laboratory Animal journals in veterinary Science with the ethical approach

SERDAR İZMİRLİ, AŞKIN YAŞAR