Does the Use of an Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery Affect the Stone-Free Rate in the Late Postoperative Period?

Does the Use of an Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery Affect the Stone-Free Rate in the Late Postoperative Period?

Aim: Studies indicate that a ureteric access sheath (UAS) is unnecessary for retrograde intrarenal surgery 5 (RIRS) if the surgeon enters the ureter directly. This research aims to look back on our case series in light of the existing literature and directly compare cases with and without a UAS in terms of efficacy, safety, and stone-free rates in the late postoperative period (3rd month). Materials and Methods: From January 2019 to June 2022, a retrospective screening of kidney stone cases treated with RIRS in our clinic was carried out. The study included one hundred fiftythree participants who complied with all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group UAS was created for individuals who received UAS applications, and Group N for those who did not. The demographics, preoperative and postoperative laboratory, and radiographic data have been compared between the two groups. Results: A comparable distribution in terms of gender and age (50.85±13.20 vs. 52.84±14.27; p=0, 476) was seen between the groups. The Charlson Comorbidity Indexes were found to have a similar distribution [median (IQR): 1 (0.5–2.5) vs. 1 (0–3); p=0.986]. Serum creatinine levels (0.92±0.27 vs. 0.97±0.34; p=0, 560), fever or sepsis (0.0% vs. 1.0%; p=0, 686), and hospital stay (2.15±0.65 vs. 2.31±0.74; p=0, 691) were comparable between the groups during the surgical follow-up. Even though Group UAS was superior in the postoperative three-month stone-free assessment with computerized tomography, this difference was not statistically significant (72.9% vs. 73.3%; p=0, 552). Conclusion: In the surgical management of kidney stones, RIRS can be used safely and effectively whether or not UAS is used. Complications and success rates in the late postoperative phase (3 months) are not significantly impacted by UAS use.

___

  • 1. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG. Kidney Stones: A Global Picture of Prevalence, Incidence, and Associated Risk Factors. Rev Urol. 2010;12(2–3):e86. doi:10.3909/riu0459.
  • 2. Chew BH, Lange D. The future of ureteroscopy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016;68. (6):592–597. Accessed August 20, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27759736/
  • 3. Ghani KR, Wolf JS. What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? Nature Reviews Urology 2015 12:5. 2015;12(5):281–288. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2015.74.
  • 4. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482. doi:10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.07.041.
  • 5. Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, et al. Comparison of stonefree rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2). doi:10.1371/ JOURNAL.PONE.0211316.
  • 6. de Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodríguez-Monsalve M, Audouin M, Doizi S, Traxer O. Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths. BJU Int. 2018;122(6):959–969. doi:10.1111/ BJU.14389.
  • 7. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580–584. doi:10.1016/J.JURO.2012.08.197.
  • 8. Torricelli FC, De S, Hinck B, Noble M, Monga M. Flexible ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath: when to stent? Urology. 2014;83(2):278–281. doi:10.1016/J. UROLOGY.2013.10.002.
  • 9. Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is Access Sheath Essential for Safety and Effective Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202–1206. doi:10.29271/JCPSP.2021.10.1202.
  • 10. Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol. 1974;112(2):176–178. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59675-5.
  • 11. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, Raj G v., Santa-Cruz RW, Preminger GM. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):3336. doi:10.1089/089277904322836631.
  • 12. Noureldin YA, Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Adamou C, Zazas E, Liatsikos EN. The Effect of Irrigation Power and Ureteral Access Sheath Diameter on the Maximal Intra-Pelvic Pressure During Ureteroscopy: In Vivo Experimental Study in a Live Anesthetized Pig. J Endourol. 2019;33(9):725–729. doi:10.1089/END.2019.0317.
  • 13. Berquet G, Prunel P, Verhoest G, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):229–232. doi:10.1007/S00345-013-1181-5.
  • 14. Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):21372144. doi:10.1007/S00345-015-1582-8.
  • 15. Berquet G, Prunel P, Verhoest G, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):229–232. doi:10.1007/S00345-013-1181-5.
  • 16. Huang J, Zhao Z, AlSmadi JK, et al. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193600. doi:10.1371/ JOURNAL.PONE.0193600.
  • 17. Cristallo C, Santillán D, Tobia I, Tirapegui FI, Daels FP, González MS. Flexible ureteroscopy without ureteral access sheath. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2022;46(6):354–360. doi:10.1016/J.ACUROE.2021.12.006.
  • 18. Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is Access Sheath Essential for Safety and Effective Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202–1206. doi:10.29271/JCPSP.2021.10.1202.
  • 19. Acar C, Cal C. Impact of residual fragments following endourological treatments in renal stones. Adv Urol. Published online 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/813523.
  • 20. Ghani KR, Wolf JS. What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? Nature Reviews Urology 2015 12:5. 2015;12(5):281–288. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2015.74
Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-2631
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Review of Clinical and Laboratory Findings of Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism by the Literature

Suat ŞEN, Fettah ACIBUCU, Asım TEKIN, Neşe BÜLBÜL, Ekin Yiğit KÖROĞLU

Lower Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy Findings in Şırnak: A Retrospective Study

Selma DEMİRBAŞ YÜCELDİ

Chest Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Evaluation of Clinical and Laboratory Findings of Patients

Hale ÇİTLENBİK, Aslı ŞENER

Factors Affecting Admission Frequency and Compliance with Antihypertensive Treatment of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Hypertensive Attack

Atakan YILMAZ, Üzeyir ÇİMEN, Canan ULUOĞLU, Yeşim KINACI ÇİMEN, Alten OSKAY, Murat SEYİT, Mert ÖZEN, İbrahim TÜRKÇÜER, Gizem ONCEL YEL, Mehmet ULUTÜRK, Aykut KEMANCI

Diagnostic Parameters for Body Packers

Kemal ŞENER, Ertuğrul ALTUĞ, Nazife Didem HANOĞLU, Gökhan EYÜPOĞLU, Ramazan GÜVEN

The Cost-effectiveness of Clomiphene Citrate Against Gonadotropin Therapy in Women with Unexplained Infertility

Meryem KURU PEKCAN, Nilüfer AKGÜN, Hasan ULUBASOGLU, Refik Ersin EROĞLU, Yasemin TASCİ

Comparison of Serum Malondialdehyde and Paraoxonase-1 Levels in Patients with Epilepsy with and without Status Epilepticus

Ahmet DÜNDAR, Demet ARSLAN, Gülsüm ÇELİK UYSAL, Ahmet YILMAZ

Diffusion MR Imaging in Evaluation of Treatment Response in Patients with Lung Cancer

Melike ŞENER SORGUN, Feray ARAS, Cihan GÖKTAN, Deniz ÖZEL

Evaluation of the Attitudes of Married Women Aged 15- 49 Living in Kars/Digor District About Family Planning Before and After the Training

Nazlı AKAR, Sevda ELİŞ YILDIZ

Diagnostic Importance of Lung Ultrasonography in the Follow-up of Patients with Blunt Chest Trauma

Güntuğ BATIHAN