MICROSURGICAL TREATMENT OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF 282 CASES

Objective: Lumbar disc herniation is an important disease that causes symptoms of back pain, leg pain, and imbalances in muscle strength in patients, causing socio-economic problems due to loss of workforce in the society. In this study, which was conducted from April 2015 to April 2017, we retrospectively evaluated the patients with lumbar disc herniation, who underwent microsurgery. Materials and Methods: Microsurgery with maximum resection principle was performed on 282 patients. Of these patients, 125 were men and 157 were women. The mean age of the patients was 44 (19-80) years. Operations were planned by using lumbar X-ray and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Computed tomography of the lumbar spine and electromyography were used to support the diagnoses when necessary. A retrospective evaluation of the patients was performed considering their gender, age, physical examination and radiological findings, disc distances, preoperative and postoperative findings, complications, recurrences, and patient satisfaction. Results: Of the included patients, 125 were men (44.33%) and 157 were women (55.67%). The mean age was 44 (19-80) years. Among the study patients, pathological findings were found at the intervertebral disc between the L1 and L2 levels in three (1.06%) patients, the L2 and L3 levels in eight (2.84%) patients, the L3 and L4 levels in 32 (11.35%) patients, the L4 and L5 levels in 103 (36.52%) patients, and the L5 and S1 levels in 61 (21.63%) patients. Pathological findings were present in two levels in 61 (21.63%) patients, in three levels in 13 (4.61%) patients, and in four levels in one (0.35%) patient. The dural injury was identified in nine (3.19%) patients, subcutaneous cerebrospinal fluid collection was present in one (0.35%) patient, and a mislabeled laminotomy was found in one (0.35%) patient. Spondylodiscitis developed in one (0.35%) patient, superficial skin infections developed in two (0.71%) patients, and postoperative spondylolisthesis occurred in one (0.35%) patient to whom stabilization was applied. Recurrences developed in eight (2.84%) patients and these patients underwent repeat surgery. According to the Prolo follow-up scale, the results of the surgery were excellent in 137 (48.58%) patients, good in 124 (43.97%) patients, moderate in 20 (7.09%) patients, and poor in one (0.35%) patient. Conclusion: Our study results demonstrate that the microsurgical technique and maximal disc resection in selected cases of surgery are effective and reliable methods in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Kaynakça

1. Akdemir H, Paşaoğlu A, Selçuklu A, Kurtsoy A, İşman L. Lumbar disk hernilerinde reoperasyon. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi 1990;12:370-6.

2. Alptekin H K, Dıraçoğlu D, Karan A. 13 Yaşında Lumbar Disk Olgusu. İst Tıp Fak Derg 2010:73-4.

3. Blaauw G, Braakman R, Gelpke GJ, Singh R. Changes in radicular function following Low-Back Surgery. J Neurosurg 1988;69:649-52.

4. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic patients. J Bone Joint Surg 1990;72:403-8.

5. Buharalı Z, Karadayı A, Cordan T, Avman N. Disk hernilerinin cerrahi tedavisi. Cerrahi olarak tedavi edilen 295 vakanın değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniv Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 1971;5:910-9.

6. Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier DD, Kretschmmer R, Gotfried Y. The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standart lumbar disc prosedure. Neurosurgery 1991;28:78-86.

7. Çelik RB. Lumbar Herni Diskal. Aktüel Tıp Dergisi 1997;1:674-8.

8. Conrad T, Pappas E, Harrington T, Sonntag H. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992;30:862-6.

9. Davis JR. CH: Extradural spinal cord and nerve root compression from benign lesions of the lumbar area. Youmans JR (ed) W.B.Sounders company 1973,63 pp.1165-85.

10. Demirbaş MA. Üst seviye lumbar disk hernilerinde insidans, klinik özellikler, tanı ve tedavi yöntemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. 2000; Uzmanlık tezi: Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi.

11. Deyo RA, Bigos SJ, Moravilla KR. Diagnostic imaging procedures for the lumbar spine. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:865-7.

12. Epstein SS. The spine. A radiological text and atlas. 4.th edition Leo Febigor, Philadelphia. ch31,pp 617-62; ch 33, pp 632-658, 1976.

13. Eugene J, Kim DH. A prospective analysis of magnetic rezonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and LDH. Spine 1997;22:1650-60.

14. Fager CA. Ruptured median and paramedian lumbar disc: A review of 243 cases. Surg Neurol 1985;23:309-23.

15. Herthoff KD, Burton CV. CT evaluation of the failed back surgery syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 1985;16:417-4.

16. Kuday C. Bel ağrıları tanı ve tedavisi: Logo Yayıncılık A.Ş. İstanbul 1993;1-28.

17. Lee JY, Ernestus RI, Schroder R, Klug N. Histological study of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in adolescents. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 200;142:1107-10.

18. Pappas CTE, Harrington T, Sonntag VKH. Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 1992;30:862-6.

19. Parisini P, Di Silvestre M, Greggi T, Miglietta A, Paderni S. Lumbar disc excision in children and adolescents. Spine 2001;26:1997-2000.

20. Paşaoğlu A, Selçuklu A. Lumbal disk hernilerinin klinik analizi ve cerrahi tedavi sonuçları. Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 1983;5:217-24.

21. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. Spine 1986;11:601-6.

22. Rastecchini F. Results of surgery compared with conservative management for lumbar disc herniations. Spine 1991;21:1383-7.

23. Rogers LA. Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar disc. Neurosurgery 1988;22:82-5.

24. Tekeoğlu İ, Göksoy T, Gürbüzoğlu N. Bel ağrılı 100 olgunun klinik ve radyolojik yönden değerlendirilmesi. Van Tıp Dergisi 19985:72-5.

25. Virta L, Ronnemsa T, Osterman K, Alto T, Laakso M. Prevelance of isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle aged subjects from easthern and Western Finland. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:917-22.

26. Weır BKA. Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurgery 1979;50:287-9.

27. Williams RW. Microdiscectomy-myth, mania or mile stone? An 18 years surgical adventure. Adv Neurosurgery 1977;4:81-7.

28. Yaşargil MG. Microsurgical operation of the herniated lumbar disc. Adv Neurosurgery 1977;4:81-7.

29. Yasuma T, Arai K, Yamauchi Y. The histology of lumbar intervertebral disc herniations. Spine 1993;18:1761-5.

30. Yıldızhan A, Aral Ö, Uluer Ş, Arslan C, Ergün J, Kafalı N, et al. Lumbar disk hernileri: Opere edilen 327 vakanın klinik analizi. Bezm-i Alem Valide Sultan Vakıf Gureba Hastanesi Dergisi 1990;17:41-4.

Kaynak Göster