Venöz rezeksiyonlu pankreatikoduodenektomi sonuçları: 11 olgu ile tek merkez deneyimi

Amaç: Kliniğimizde venöz rezeksiyonlu pankreatikoduodenektomi (PD) uygulanan hastalarda morbidite ve mortalite oranlarının ve prosedürün güvenilirliğinin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: XXX Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı'nda Mayıs 2016-Mayıs 2021 tarihleri arasında venöz rezeksiyon ile PD uygulanan 11 hastanın kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: On bir hasta (beş kadın, altı erkek) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 64,09 ± 9.27 (47-78) idi. Dört (%36,36) hastaya tip 1, bir (%9,09) hastaya tip 2, beş (%45,45) hastaya tip 3 ve bir (%9,09) hastaya tip 4 rekonstrüksiyon uygulandı. Histopatoloji raporlarına göre sekiz (%72,73) hastada venöz invazyon saptandı. Tanı ile operasyon arasındaki ortalama süre 14,91 ± 11,33 gün, ortalama takip süresi 17,64 ± 13,31 aydı. Postoperatif 17. günde exitus olan bir hastada (%9,09) Grade C pankreas fistülü izlendi. Takipte hiçbir hastada nüks veya metastaz saptaanmadı. Sonuç: Venöz rezeksiyon-rekonstrüksiyonlu PD, pankreas kanseri ve venöz invazyonu olan hastalarda güvenli ve tek küratif seçenektir.

Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection: a single center experience with 11 cases

Aim: To perform a retrospective evaluation of the morbidity and mortality rates and reliability of venous resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) procedures in our clinic. Material and Method: The records of 11 patients who underwent PD with venous resection between May 2016 and May 2021 in the Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Department of General Surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eleven patients (five women and six men) were included. The patients’ mean age was 64.09±9.27 years (range 47-78). Four (36.36%) patients underwent type 1 reconstruction, one (9.09%) type 2 reconstruction, five (45.45%) type 3 reconstruction and one (9.09%) type 4 reconstruction. Eight (72.73%) patients experienced venous invasion according to the histopathology reports. Mean time between diagnosis and surgery was 14.91±11.33 days, and the mean follow-up time was 17.64±13.31 months. Grade C pancreatic fistula was observed in one (9.09%) patient, who died on the 17th postoperative day. No patients experienced recurrence or metastasis during surveillance. Conclusion: Pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection-reconstruction is safe and the only curative option in patients with pancreatic cancer and venous invasion.

___

  • Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Annals of Surgery 2007; 245: 777-83.
  • Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Annals of Surgery 2005; 242: 540-4; discussion 4-7.
  • Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Annals of Surgery 2006; 244: 10-5.
  • Maley WR, Yeo CJ. Vascular Resections During the Whipple Procedure. Advances in Surgery 2017; 51: 41-63.
  • Moore GE, Sako Y, Thomas LB. Radical pancreatoduodenectomy with resection and reanastomosis of the superior mesenteric vein. Surgery 1951; 30: 550-3.
  • Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2021; 19: 439-57.
  • Kakar S, Pawlik T, Allen P. Exocrine pancreas. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8 ed: AJCC; 2017. p. 337.
  • Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014; 155: 977-88.
  • Sgroi MD, Narayan RR, Lane JS, et al. Vascular reconstruction plays an important role in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vascular Surg 2015; 61: 475-80.
  • Barreto SG, Windsor JA. Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. The Lancet Oncology 2016; 17: e118-e24.
  • Xie ZB, Gu JC, Zhang YF, et al. Portal vein resection and reconstruction with artificial blood vessels is safe and feasible for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with portal vein involvement: Chinese center experience. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 77883-96.
  • Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, et al. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. British J Surg 2004; 91: 586-94.
  • Martin RC, 2nd, Scoggins CR, Egnatashvili V, et al. Arterial and venous resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: operative and long-term outcomes. Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 2009; 144: 154-9.
  • Müller SA, Hartel M, Mehrabi A, et al. Vascular resection in pancreatic cancer surgery: survival determinants. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 784-92.
  • Tashiro S, Uchino R, Hiraoka T, et al. Surgical indication and significance of portal vein resection in biliary and pancreatic cancer. Surgery 1991; 109: 481-7.
  • Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Annals of Surgery 1992; 215: 231-6.
  • Takahashi S, Ogata Y, Tsuzuki T. Combined resection of the pancreas and portal vein for pancreatic cancer. British J Surg 1994; 81: 1190-3.
  • Allema JH, Reinders ME, van Gulik TM, et al. Portal vein resection in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head. British J Surg 1994; 81: 1642-6.
  • Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T, et al. Clinical significance of portal invasion by pancreatic head carcinoma. Surgery 1995; 117: 50-5.
  • Roder JD, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Carcinoma of the periampullary region: who benefits from portal vein resection? Am J Surg 1996; 171: 170-4; discussion 4-5.
  • Fuhrman GM, Leach SD, Staley CA, et al. Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. Pancreatic Tumor Study Group. Annals of Surgery 1996; 223: 154-62.
  • Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A contraindication for resection? Annals of Surgery 1996; 224: 342-7; discussion 7-9.
  • Clavien PA, Rüdiger HA. A simple technique of portal vein resection and reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am College of Surgeons 1999; 189: 629-34.
  • Schäfer M, Müllhaupt B, Clavien PA. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Annals of Surgery 2002; 236: 137-48.
  • Chu CK, Farnell MB, Nguyen JH, et al. Prosthetic graft reconstruction after portal vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter analysis. J Am Colllege of Surgeons 2010; 211: 316-24.
  • Cherukuru R, Govil S, Vij M, et al. Vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric venous axis is beneficial despite a high rate of R1 resection. Annals of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surg 2018; 22: 261-8.
  • Ravikumar R, Sabin C, Abu Hilal M, et al. Impact of portal vein infiltration and type of venous reconstruction in surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. British J Surg 2017; 104: 1539-48.
Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2020
  • Yayıncı: MediHealth Academy Yayıncılık
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Toraks BT'de mediastinal yağ dokusu ve aort ölçümleri: ateroskleroz ile ilişkisi var mı?

Pelin Zeynep BEKİN SARIKAYA, Atike TEKELİ KUNT

Geriatrik popülasyonda malnutrisyonun bibliometrik analizi

Duygu TUTAN, Suna BÜRKÜK

HPV DNA pozitif olguların servikal smear ile korelasyon sonuçları her zaman uyumlu mudur?

Sema ZERGEROĞLU, Zehra Sema ÖZKAN, Arzu Hazal AYDIN

Adjuvan mitomisin-C ile cerrahi eksizyon sonrası konjonktival papillomlu hastalarda kuru göz parametrelerinin değerlendirilmesi

Ceyda BAŞKAN, Sabite Emine GÖKCE

Ganglion kistlerinin cerrahi tedavisinde farklı anestezik yaklaşımların nüks gelişimi üzerindeki etkileri

Bedrettin AKAR

Kolokteral karsinomda histopatolojik düşük ve yüksek dereceli tümörlerin ayrımı için bilgisayarlı tomografi histogram analizinin tanısal etkinliği

Kamil DOĞAN, Murat BAYKARA, Abdulkadir Yasir BAHAR, Müslüm ÖZGÜL

Rektal kanser cerrahisinde koruyucu ileostomi, koruyucu ileostomi gerçekten geçici mi?

Cemal ULUSOY, Mehmet Güray DUMAN, Sıla GÜÇLÜ METE, Andrej NİKOLOVSKİ

Marjinal rezeksiyon sonrası gelişen tek merkezli 31 elastofibroma dorsi vakalarında komplikasyonları etkileyen faktörler

Mesut MISIRLIOĞLU, İzzet BİNGÖL, Hüseyin ÇAKMAK, Hamit GÖKSU, Umut BARAN ZENGİN, Bedii Şafak GÜNGÖR

Periprostetik eklem enfeksiyonlarında preoperatif kan parametrelerinin tanısal değeri

İzzet KORKMAZ

Dil kanserli hastalarda preoperatif neoadjuvan kemoterapinin prognostik rolü

Süleyman CEBECİ, Emirhan AKYOL, Utku AYDİL, Alper DİLCİ, Aytuğ ÜNER