Horizontal bone augmentation using a mixture of cortico-cancellous allograft and bovine bone mineral with a collagen membrane: a retrospective study

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of bone augmentation with a mixture of cortico-cancellous allograft and xenograft with a collagen membrane in horizontal augmentation of knife-edge alveolar crests. Material and Method: Patients with a ridge thickness of less than 4 mm by preoperative tomography were included in the study. Twelve patients (10 Female, 2 Male) were treated with a mixture of Cortico-Cancellous Allograft and Bovine Bone Mineral with a collagen membrane. Results: Thirty-nine implants were placed in twelve patients. The initial bone thickness is between 1 and 4 cm (mean: 3±0.89440). Nine months after horizontal augmentation, bone thickness varies between 4.53 and 9.15 cm (mean: 4.62±1.16782). The gained bone thickness varies between 1.27 and 7.72 cm (mean 3.66±1.21041). Conclusion: Augmentation of alveolar bones knife-edge crestal margins with a mixture of Cortico-Cancellous Allograft and Bovine Bone Mineral with a collagen membrane is simple, successful, and feasible.

Keywords:

Alveolar bone grafting, bone regeneration, bone substitutes guided tissue regeneration,

PDF

___

Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2009; 24: 237-59.
Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, et al. Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontology 2000 1999; 19: 151-63.
Sheikh Z, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, et al. Biodegradable materials for bone repair and tissue engineering applications. Materials 2015; 8: 5744-94.
Khojasteh A, Behnia H, Soleymani Shayesteh Y, et al. Localized bone augmentation with cortical bone blocks tented over different particulate bone substitutes: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 6.
Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Hayacibara R, et al. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced–augmented and non‐augmented–defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 435-40.
Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio‐Oss®. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 137-43.
Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjørting‐Hansen E, et al. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β‐tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 237-43.
Lee IK, Lim HC, Lee JS, et al. Layered approach with autogenous bone and bone substitute for ridge augmentation on implant dehiscence defects in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 622-8.
Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2011; 26: 2.
Serrano CA, Castellanos P, Botticelli D. Use of combination of allografts and xenografts for alveolar ridge preservation procedures: a clinical and histological case series. Implant Dent 2018; 27: 467-73.
Galindo‐Moreno P, Moreno‐Riestra I, Ávila G, et al. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 122-8.
Poulias E, Greenwell H, Hill M, et al. Ridge preservation comparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facial overlay xenograft: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1567-75.
Mordenfeld A, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T, et al. A randomized and controlled clinical trial of two different compositions of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone used for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 310-20.
Elnayef B, Porta C, Del Amo FS-L, et al. The Fate of Lateral Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: 3.
Hashemipoor M, Asghari N, Mohammadi M, et al. Radiological and histological evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using corticocancellous freeze‐dried bone allograft with and without autogenous bone: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2020; 22: 582-92.
Song YW, Jung HJ, An YZ, et al. Addition of autogenous bone chips to deproteinized bovine bone mineral does not have additional benefit in lateral ridge augmentation—A preclinical in vivo experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32: 1105-14.
Kloss FR, Offermanns V, Kloss‐Brandstätter A. Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects—A 12‐month retrospective radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 1163-75.
Wang H-L, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2006;15: 8-17.
Shah R, Gowda TM, Thomas R, et al. Biological activation of bone grafts using injectable platelet-rich fibrin. J Prosth Dent 2019; 121: 391-3.
Yuan S, Li Q, Chen K, Mu Z et al. Ridge preservation applying a novel hydrogel for early angiogenesis and osteogenesis evaluation: an experimental study in canine. J Biol Eng 2021;15:19.
Mu Z, Chen K, Yuan S, et al. Gelatin nanoparticleinjectable platelet-rich fibrin double network hydrogels with local adaptability and bioactivity for enhanced osteogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater 2020;9:e1901469.
Irdem, H. O., Dolanmaz, D., Esen, A. et. al (2021). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Mixture on Newly Formed Bone in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Split-Mouth, Histomorphometric Study. Histomorphometric Study Niger J Clin Pract, 24, 1366-1372.
Luca De S., Tunkel, M. J., Fincato, M. A. et. al. (2021). The Vestibular Shifted Flap Design for Vertical Bone Augmentation in the Maxilla: Case Report and Technical Notes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 41, 367-373.
Soldatos NK, Stylianou P, Koidou VP, et al. Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration. Quintessence International 2017; 48: 2.