Development and pilot testing of remote active learning tool as antimicrobial stewardship co-interventions

Development and pilot testing of remote active learning tool as antimicrobial stewardship co-interventions

Purpose: Online education tool is known for its cost-effectivity as antimicrobial stewardship intervention, yet only a limited number of studies was done in developing country settings. This pilot was therefore conducted to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effect of the prescriber-directed distance learning model and analyze feedback for future intervention. Patients and methods: The research procedure was outlined in preparation, conduct, and evaluation phase under antimicrobial resistance control committee supervision. The preparatory phase included learning tool planning and finalization to be disseminated in the conduct phase. Educational intervention delivery was preceded and followed with pre- and posttest to assess attendings’ knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding AMS and collect feedbacks on intervention components. Test scores were compared using paired t-test, and feedbacks were analyzed as aggregates as barriers or facilitators of AMS intervention. Results: A total of 203 subjects were included in the analysis with 99% recruitment rate and 96.7% adherence rate. Proportions of subjects with adequate knowledge and attitudinal scores improved from initially 36.9% and 21.2% before intervention into 83.3% and 51.7%, respectively. Mean knowledge score in pretest (6.1±1.2) increased significantly in posttest (7.6±1.1) with p-value less than 0.001. Knowledge on antimicrobial classification and prescription workflow were the main topics with the least number of correct answers. Facilitators identified in the feedback were access to workflow, guideline, resistance pattern, and course, while antimicrobial availability was regarded as a barrier to optimal AMS implementation. Conclusion: The findings suggest the feasibility and acceptability of the evaluated protocol. Protocol modification and expansion of study recruitment hold the potential to improve AMS intervention efficacy.

___

  • 1. Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3903.
  • 2. Founou RC, Founou LL, Essack SY. Clinical and economic impact of antibiotic resistance in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(12).
  • 3. Romo AL, Quirós R. Appropriate use of antibiotics: an unmet need. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:175628721983217.
  • 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs: Antibiotic stewardship program assessment tool [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/healthcare/pdfs/assessment-tool-P.pdf
  • 5. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. In-hospital antimicrobial stewardship guidance. Jakarta; 2020.
  • 6. Pereira NR, Castro-Sanchez E, Nathwani D. How can Multi-Professional Education Support Better Stewardship? Infect Dis Rep. 2017;9(1):1–7.
  • 7. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E, et al. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(2).
  • 8. Nathwani D, Varghese D, Stephens J, Ansari W, Martin S, Charbonneau C. Value of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs [ASPs]: a systematic review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1).
  • 9. Kyaw BM, Car LT, Galen LS van, Agtmael MA van, Costelloe CE, Ajuebor O, et al. Health Professions Digital Education on Antibiotic Management: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(9).
  • 10. Satterfield J, Miesner AR, Percival KM. The role of education in antimicrobial stewardship. J Hosp Infect. 2020;105(2):130–41.
  • 11. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355.
  • 12. Hawes L, Buising K, Mazza D. Antimicrobial Stewardship in General Practice: A Scoping Review of the Component Parts. Antibiotics. 2020;9(8):1–13.
Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1980
  • Yayıncı: Ondokuz mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

An evaluation of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in patients receiving growth hormone therapy and these parameters therapeutic efficacy

Abdulvahit AŞIK, Semih BOLU

DENTAL PATIENTS’ KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, BEHAVIORS, AND FEAR FOR COVID-19

Aslıhan AKBULUT, Kaan ORHAN

Sex-Related Differences in Anxiety in Experimental Functional Dyspepsia Induced by Chronic Stress

Osman SİNEN

Comparison of diadynamic current, interferential current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapies in patients with chronic low back pain

Alper UYSAL, Murat GÜNTEL

Effect of irisin on the epilepsy induced by penicillin G: An electrophysiological study

Yasemin ŞAHİN YILDIZ, Şerif DEMİR, Ersin BEYAZÇİÇEK, Ali GÖK, Özge BEYAZÇİÇEK

Values of Intensive Care Scores in Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Treated for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Hale KEFELİ ÇELİK, Zahide DOĞANAY, Ramazan Burak FERLİ

The Relationship between Human Papillomavirus and Anxiety, Depression, and Sexual Dysfunction in Women

Naziye GÜRKAN, Tuğba GÜRBÜZ

EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC THIOL-DISULFIDE HOMEOSTASIS ON HPV POSITIVE-WOMEN IN PROGRESSION TO CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION

Recep ERİN, Yeşim BAYOĞLU TEKİN, Hatice KÜÇÜK, Özcan EREL

Study of Bacteria Isolated from COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Units and Determination of Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles

Çetin KILINÇ, Nilay COPLU, Melike YAŞAR DUMAN, Büşra ÇALIŞIR, Enis Fuat TÜFEKCİ, Muhammet GÜLHAN, Ayşe YILMAZ, Veysel Garani SOYLU

SIGNIFICANCE OF TISSUE OXYGENIZATION IN PATIENTS CONNECTED TO A MECHANICAL VENTILATOR

Fulya KÖSE, Bülent GÜNGÖRER, Hanifi ARSLAN, Abdullah Sadık GİRİŞGİN, Zerrin Defne DÜNDAR, Merve GÜVEN