The Examination of the Relationship Between Flexibility andStability of Trunk in Older Adults

The Examination of the Relationship Between Flexibility andStability of Trunk in Older Adults

Purpose: This study was planned to examine the relationship between body flexibility and stability in the elderly and to compare it with adults. Methods: People over 40-year-of-age had no musculoskeletal problems in the spine, had good cognitive functions, and could walk independently were included in this cross-sectional study. 156 participants were grouped as the young (n: 65) and the elderly group (n: 91). Flexibility assessment included Sit and Reach Test (SRT), Back Extension Test (BET) and Side Bending Test (SBT). Antero-posterior stability of body was measured by Functional Reach Test (FRT). Results: The flexibility of trunk in four directions and stability were better in young group than elderly group (p0.05). Conclusion: Loss of flexibility is a more important risk factor than aging for balance and stability impairment. So it is suggested that treatment protocols should include approaches increasing body flexibility to increase body stability.

___

  • Yıldırım MS, Ozyurek S, Tosun OÇ, Uzer S, Gelecek N. Comparison of effects of static, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Mulligan stretching on hip flexion range of motion: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Sport 2016;33:89–94. [CrossRef]
  • Paterson DH, Warburton DE. Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:38. [CrossRef]
  • Johns RJ, Wright V. Relative importance of various tissues in joint stiffness. J Appl Physiol 1962;17:824–828. [CrossRef]
  • Goldspink G, Harridge S. Cellular and molecular aspects of adaptation in skeletal muscle. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and Power in Sport, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Blackwell Science Ltd.; 2003. pp.231–251. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.455.6598&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, et al. Exercise and physical activity for older adult. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:1510–1530. [CrossRef]
  • Daley MJ, Spinks WL. Exercise, mobility and aging. Sports Med 2000;29:1–12. [CrossRef]
  • Stathokostas L, McDonald MW, Little RM, Paterson DH. Flexibility of older adults aged 55–86 years and the influence of physical activity. J Aging Res 2013;2013:743–843. [CrossRef]
  • Katzman WB, Wanek L, Shepherd JA, Sellmeyer DE. Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:352–360. [CrossRef]
  • Wijlhuizen GJ, Chorus AMJ, Hopman-Rock M. Fragility, fear of falling, physical activity and falls among older persons: some theoretical considerations to interpret mediation. Prev Med 2008;46:612–614. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Day L. Fall and injury risk; In: Lord SR, Sherrington C, Menz HB, editors. Falls in Older People: Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp.17–40.
  • 11. Tomchuk D, editor. Companion Guide to Measurement and Evaluation for Kinesiology. London: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2011. pp.23–43.
  • 12. Suni JH, Oja P, Miilunpalo SI, Pasanen ME, Vuori IM, Bös K. Healthrelated fitness test battery for adults: associations with perceived health, mobility and back function and symptoms. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:559–569. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Kwak CJ, Kim YL, Lee SM. Effects of elastic-band resistance exercise on balance, mobility and gait function, flexibility and fall efficacy in elderly people. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28:3189–3196. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Williams B, Allen B, Hu Z, et al. Real-time fall risk assessment using functional reach test. Int J Telemed Appl 2017;2017;1–8. [CrossRef] https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2042974
  • 15. Martinez-Lopez Emilio EJ, Hita-Contreras F, Jimenez-Lara PM, Latorre-Roman P, Martinez-Amat A. The association of flexibility, balance, and lumbar strength with balance ability: risk of falls in older adults. J Sports Sci Med 2014;13:349–357. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990889/
  • 16. Williams GN, Higgins MJ, Lewek MD. Aging skeletal muscle: physiologic changes and the effects of training. Phys Ther 2002;82:6268. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Adams K, O’Shea P, O’Shea KL. Aging: Its effects on strength, power, f lexibility, and bone density. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1999;21:6577. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Einkauf DK, Gohdes ML, Jensen GM, Jewel MJ. Changes in spinal mobility with increasing age in women. Phys Ther 1957;67:370–375. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Adamo DE, Talley SA, Goldberg A. Age and task differences in functional tests in older women: comparisons with senior fitness test normative and criterion-referenced data. J Aging Phys Act 2015;23:47–54. [CrossRef]
  • 20. McCulloch RG, Clark DG, Pike I, Slobodian YM. Gender specific trends in fitness anthropometric parameters in a selected Saskatchewan sample, aged 65–75 years. Can J Aging 1994;13:30–40. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Blaszczyk JW, Micholski A. Aging and postural instability. Studies in Physical Culture and Tourism 2006;13:11–14. https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/1d8a/9b06baed1b66234af1283ee976d5d52c9b7c.pdf
  • 22. Chiacchiero M, Dresely B, Silva U, DeLosReyes R, Vorik B. The relationship between range of movement, flexibility, and balance in the elderly. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2010;26:148–155. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Suri P, Kiely DK, Leveille SG, Frontera WR, Bean JF. Trunk muscle attributes are associated with balance and mobility in older adults: a pilot study. PM R 2009;1:916–924. [CrossRef]