Evaluation of Analytical Process Performance by Six Sigma Method
Evaluation of Analytical Process Performance by Six Sigma Method
Purpose: Clinical laboratories are responsible for producing reliable, reproducible and accurate test results. Should establish quality in theirtest analysis and evaluate process performance. Six sigma is a quality management strategy that evaluation of processes. The aim of our studyis to evaluate the analytical process performance of routine tests in our laboratory with six sigma method.Methods: Internal quality control (IQC) data of routine tests in our laboratory were obtained retrospectively. Mean, standard deviation andcoefficient of variation (CV) values of the IQC data were calculated. Process sigma values were calculated using the formula “Total AllowableError (TEa)%-Bias% /CV% “. TEa values were determined according to CLIA’88. Sigma value ≤3 low quality, between 3 and 6 good quality and≥6 was recognized as world class quality.Results: The sigma levels of all the tests we evaluated were >3. Sigma levels of albumin, creatinine, LDL, urea, chloride, total cholesterol, HDL,sodium for IQC 1; albumin, urea, UIBC, chloride, creatinine, potassium, sodium and direct bilirubin for IQC2 were between 3–6. The sigmalevels of ALP, ALT, AST, CK, CKMB, iron, UIBC, phosphorus, GGT, glucose, calcium, LDH, magnesium, potassium, total protein, triglyceride, uricacid, amylase, lipase, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, CRP for IQC 1; ALP, ALT, AST, CK, CK-MB, iron, phosphorus, GGT, glucose, calcium, totalcholesterol, HDL, LDL, LDH, magnesium, total protein, triglyceride, uric acid, amylase, lipase, total bilirubin, CRP tests for IQC 2 were ≥6.Conclusion: Six sigma methodology is an effective method for evaluating the analytical process performance of the laboratory. According tothe results of our study, our laboratory performance is good or first class.
___
- 1. Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control, 2nd ed. Madison
WI. Westgard QC Inc; 2006.
- 2. Zorbozan O, Zorbozan N, Turgay N. Üçüncü basamak sağlık
merkezinin parazitoloji laboratuvarında analiz öncesi sürecin kalite
belirteçleri ve altı sigma yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Mikrobiyol Bul
2019;53:319–329. [CrossRef]
- 3. CLSI. Developing and using quality indicators for laboratory
improvement, 2nd ed. CLSI guideline QMS12. Wayne, PA. Clinical
laboratory standards institute; 2019.
- 4. Wolcott J, Schwartz A, Goodman C, editors. Laboratory Medicine
a National Status Report. Chapter IV: Quality and the Total Testing
Process. 2008. pp.139–195. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/
labbestpractices/pdfs/2007-status-report-laboratory_medicine_-_a_
national_status_report_from_the_lewin_group_updated_2008-9.pdf
- 5. Coskun A, Inal T, Unsal I, Serteser M. Six sigma as a quality
management tool: Evaluation of performance in laboratory medicine.
www.intechopen.com 2007;247–262. [CrossRef]
- 6. Coskun A, editor. Quality Management and Six Sigma (ISBN 978-953-
307-130-5). www.sciyo.com. Rijeka: Croatia; 2010.
- 7. Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC Working group on laboratory
errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:79–85. [CrossRef]
- 8. Sciacovelli L, O’Kane M, Skaik YA, et al. Quality ındicators in laboratory
medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC
working group project “Laboratory errors and patient safety”. Clin
Chem Lab Med 2011;49:835–844. [CrossRef]
- 9. Demir S. Süreç Performansının Ölçülmesi: Altı Sigma Yöntemi. Aslan
D, editör. Klinik laboratuvarlarda analitik kalite yönetimi kursu kitabı.
İzmir: Türk Biyokimya Derneği; 2010. pp.83–90.
- 10. Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic A. Special issue: Quality in laboratory
diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochemia Medica 2010;20:126–
130. [CrossRef]
- 11. Avcı E, Çeken N, Kangal Z, Demir S, İren Emekli D, Zorbozan N.
Approach to pre-analytical errors in a public health laboratory. Turk J
Biochem 2017;42:59–63. [CrossRef]
- 12. Westgard JO. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the
medical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:31–40. [CrossRef]
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2010.024
- 13. Llopis MA, Trujillo G, Llovet MI, et al. Quality indicators and
specifications for key analytical-extranalytical processes in the clinical
laboratory. Five years’ experience using the six sigma concept. Clin
Chem Lab Med 2011;49:463–470. [CrossRef]
- 14. Miller G. Quality Control. In: McPherson R, Pincus M, editors. Henry’s
Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 22nd
ed. Philadelphia, PA: Suanders; 2011. pp.119–234.
- 15. Nar R, Iren Emekli D. The evaluation of analytical performance of
immunoassay tests by using six-sigma method. J Med Biochem
2017;36:301–308. [CrossRef]
- 16. Fraser CG, Kallner A, Kenny D, Hyltoft Petersen P, P. Strategies to set
global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine. Scand
J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:475–585. [CrossRef]
- 17. Hens K, Berth M, Armbruster D, Westgard S. Sigma metrics used to
assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the
allowable total error (TEa) target. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:973–
980. [CrossRef]
- 18. Aslan D, Demir S. Laboratuvar tıbbında altı sigma kalite yönetimi. Turk
J Biochem 2005;30:272–278. Available at: http://www.turkjbiochem.
com/2005/272_278.pdf
- 19. Aslan D, Sert S, Aybek H, Yılmaztürk G. Klinik laboratuvarlarda
toplam laboratuvar performansının değerlendirilmesi: Normalize
OPSpec grafikleri, altı sigma ve hasta test sonuçları. Turk J Biochem
2005;30:296–305. Available at: http://www.turkjbiochem.
com/2005/296_305.pdf
- 20. Inal T. Preanalitik süreçte altı sigma. Aslan D, editör. Klinik
laboratuvarlarda analitik kalite yönetimi kursu kitabı. İzmir: Türk
Biyokimya Derneği; 2010. pp.91–94.
- 21. Westgard JO. Control of analytical quality using patient data; section
III. In: Tietz NW, Burtis CA, Ashwood AR, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz
Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, 4th ed. St.
Louis: Elsevier Saunders Company; 2006. pp.510–515.
- 22. İnal BB, Usta M, Aral H, Tuhral C, Bilgi PT, Güvenen G. Vitamin
B12 ölçümlerinin kısa dönemli analitik performansının
değerlendirilmesinde normallerin ortalaması (AON) uygulaması. Turk
J Biochem 2010;35:67–71. Available at: http://www.turkjbiochem.
com/2010/067-071.pdf
- 23. Kazmierczak SC. Laboratory quality control using patient data to
assess analytical performance. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41:617–627.
[CrossRef]
- 24. Pande PS, Neuman RP, Cavanagh RR. The Six Sigma Way, 1st ed. New
York: McGraw Hill; 2000.
- 25. Berte ML. Laboratory Quality Management: A road map. Clin Lab
Med 2007;27:771–790. [CrossRef]
- 26. Mao X, Shao J, Zhang B, Wang Y. Evaluating analytical quality in
clinical biochemistry laboratory using six sigma. Biochem Med
(Zagreb) 2018;28:020904. [CrossRef]
- 27. Afrifa J, Gyekye SA, Owiredu WK, et al. Application of sigma metrics
for the assessment of quality control in clinical chemistry laboratory
in Ghana: A pilot study. Niger Med J 2015;56:54–58. [CrossRef]
- 28. Singh B, Goswami B, Gupta VK, Chawla R, Mallika V. Application
of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality assurance in clinical
biochemistry laboratory in India: A pilot study. Indian J Clin Biochem
2011;26:131–135. [CrossRef]
- 29. Nanda SK, Ray L. Quantitative application of sigma metrics in medical
biochemistry. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2689–2691. [CrossRef]