VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE NURSES’ ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY SCALE – ACUTE CARE VERSION: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016. The study included 427 nurses who worked in the internal diseases, surgery, and obstetric clinics of the related hospitals. Data were collected through the “Nurse Information Form” and “Nurses’ Assessment of Quality Scale – Acute Care Version”. While the validity analysis of the NAQS-ACV included language, scope, and construct analysis, reliability analysis included internal consistency reliability analysis. The 77-item Turkish version of the NAQS-ACV was composed of 3 sections and 8 sub-scales. Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE NURSES’ ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY SCALE – ACUTE CARE VERSION: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

This is a methodological study that aims to adapt the NAQS-ACV scale to the Turkish context, as well as to test its validity and reliability. The study was conducted in 1 medical Faculty hospital, 2 public hospitals, and 1 private hospital in a city located in the southern part of Turkey between the 1st of January and 31st of March 2016. The study included 427 nurses who worked in the internal diseases, surgery, and obstetric clinics of the related hospitals. Data were collected through the “Nurse Information Form” and “Nurses’ Assessment of Quality Scale – Acute Care Version”. While the validity analysis of the NAQS-ACV included language, scope, and construct analysis, reliability analysis included internal consistency reliability analysis. The 77-item Turkish version of the NAQS-ACV was composed of 3 sections and 8 sub-scales. Sub-scale KMO values of the scale ranged between 0.775 and 0.948, and the Barlett test result was found p

___

  • Akbas, M. (2019). Patient satisfaction on nursing care: the case of gynecology and obstetrics clinics. Acta bioethica, 25(1), 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2019000100127
  • Alpar, C. (2016). Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences. Ankara: Detail Publishing.
  • Blasdell, N.D. (2017). The meaning of caring in nursing practice. Int J Nurs Clin Pract, 4(238), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/238
  • Burhans, L.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2010). Quality nursing care in the words of nurses. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(8), 1689-1697.
  • Capık, C. (2016). Use of confıdentıal factor analysıs ın valıdıty and relıabılıty studıes. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3):196-205.
  • Celik H. E., & Yilmaz V (2016). Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd Ed. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Publishing, 23-51.
  • Church, C.D. (2016). Defining competence in nursing and its relevance to quality care. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(5), E9-E14. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000289
  • Costello, M. (2017). Nurses’ Self-Identified Characteristics and Behaviors Contributing to Patients’ Positive Perceptions of Their Nursing Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(1), 62-66. 10.1177/0898010116643835
  • Gul, S. (2019). Nursıng care ın the lıght of care concept and affectıng factors. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg, 10(2), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2019.134
  • Karaca, A., & Durna, Z. (2018). Nursing Care Quality and Associated Factors. Health and Society, 28(3), 16-23.
  • Kol, E., Geckil, E., Arıkan, C., Ilter, M., Ozcan, O., Sakırgun, E., ... & Uslular, E. (2017). Investigation of nursing care perception in Turkey. Acibadem University Journal of Health Sciences , 8, 163-72.
  • Koy, V., Yunibhand, J., Angsuroch, Y., & Fisher, M.L. (2015). Relationship between nursing care quality, nurse staffing, nurse job satisfaction, nurse practice environment, and burnout: literature review. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(8), 1825-1831. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150288
  • Lynn, M.R., McMillen, B.J., & Sidani, S. (2007). Including the provider in the assessment of quality care: development and testing of the Nurses' assessment of quality scale—acute care version. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 22(4), 328-336. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290414.42640.c0 Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 835.
  • Mororo, D.D.D.S., Enders, B. C., Lira, A.L.B.D.C., Silva, C.M.B.D., & Menezes, R.M.P.D. (2017). Concept analysis of nursing care management in the hospital context. Acta paulista de enfermagem, 30, 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201700043
  • Ozturk, H., Demirsoy, N., Sayligil, O., & Florczak, K.L. (2020). Patients’ perceptions of nursing care in a university hospital. Nursing science quarterly, 33(1), 12-18. DOI: 10.1177/089431841988179
  • Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
  • Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P., Hall, A., & Ostendorf, W.R. (2016). Fundamentals of Nursing. (9th Ed.), USD: Elsevier, Retrieved from: EVELVE.ELSEVIER.COM.
  • Tavsancil, E. (2014). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publications.
  • Yorke, D. (2016). Patient care: what is it. Journal of Patient Care, 2(2), DOI: 10.4172/2573-4598.1000e101
  • Yurdugul, H. (2005). Using content validity indexes for content validity in scale development studies. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, 1, 771-774.
Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

SİMÜLASYONA DAYALI ÖĞRENMEDE “ÇÖZÜMLEME DENEYİM ÖLÇEĞİ”NİN TÜRKÇE VERSİYONUNUN GEÇERLİK GÜVENİRLİĞİ

Yasemin USLU, Hilal TÜZER, Tülay BAŞAK, Vildan KOCATEPE, Merve KANIĞ, Vesile ÜNVER, Ükke KARABACAK, Bahar İNKAYA, Tuba YILMAZER

HEMŞİRELİK EĞİTİMİNDE EĞİTİM PROGRAMI DEĞERLENDİRME ÇALIŞMALARI: SİSTEMATİK DERLEME

Gülsüm ÇONOĞLU, Fatma ORGUN, Nilay ÖZKÜTÜK

60 YAŞ VE ÜSTÜ BİREYLERDE KORONAVİRÜS (COVID-19) FARKINDALIĞI VE İLİŞKİLİ FAKTÖRLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Adile TÜMER, Gözde AYGÜN, Muammer TUNA

HEMŞİRELİK VE ÇOCUK GELİŞİMİ BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN TİP 2 DİYABET RİSK ALGILARININ, SAĞLIKLI YAŞAM BİÇİMİ DAVRANIŞLARININ VE TİP 2 DİYABET RİSK DÜZEYLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

İlknur ÖZKAN, Secil TAYLAN, Sema Nur ÇİÇEK

KUŞLARDA KLİNİK MUAYENE VE SAĞALTIM AŞAMASINDA KULLANILAN ENJEKTABL ANESTEZİK VE ANALJEZİKLER

Ali BİLGİLİ

YOĞUN BAKIM HEMŞİRELERİNİN SANTRAL VENÖZ BASINÇ ÖLÇÜMÜ HAKKINDAKİ BİLGİ, TUTUM VE DAVRANIŞLARI

Eda ERGİN, Aliye OKGÜN, Fatma ZAMAN

KETOJENİK BESLENME VE SAĞLIK

Ceren FİLİZ, Elif YILDIZ, Ozan GÜRBÜZ

FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN TAMAMLAYICI VE ALTERNATİF TIP UYGULAMALARI HAKKINDAKİ BİLGİ, TUTUM VE DAVRANIŞLARI

Gökmen YAPALI, Serdar ARSLAN, Cihan Caner AKSOY, Neslihan Altuntas YILMAZ

Tip 1 Diabetes Mellituslu 12- 18 Yaş Arası Adölesanlarda Kan Şekeri Ölçüm Becerilerini Değerlendirme Ölçeği: Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

Sevgim KÜÇÜK, Nurdan AKÇAY DİDİŞEN

İNSANLARDAKİ COVID-19 YABAN HAYVANLARINDA RİSK OLUŞTURUYOR MU?

Basak HANEDAN, Ali BİLGİLİ, Nigar ABBASOVA