Theorizing the Developmental State beyond Nation-State Histories and Trajectories: The Non-Sovereign Model and the Case of Finland

Developmental state theorization has largely centered on sovereign nation-states and the post-World War II era even while, first, historical work has shown important continuities across even the 1917-1919 divide and, second, recently the importance of a capabilities approach that extends beyond the confines of strictly sovereign state agency has been stressed. Focusing on these two considerations, this article brings historical variance to the developmental state literature by introducing the nonsovereign model that is based on the Finnish national historical trajectory. It argues that the Finnish developmental state project began in the pre-independence era in the Russian Empire and continued along the same core strategy through the interwar years and Finlandization under the Soviet Union all the way to membership in the European Union.

PDF

___

Amzi-Erdogdular, L. (2017). Alternative Muslim modernities: Bosnian intellectuals in the Ottoman and Habsburg Empires. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(4), 912–943.
Aunesluoma, J., & Rainio-Niemi, J. (2016). Neutrality as identity? Finland’s quest for security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies, 18(4), 51–78.
Bagchi, A. K. (2004). The developmental state in history and in the twentieth century. Regency Publications.
Berg-Andersson, B. (2019). EU:n Venäjän vastaisten kauppapakotteiden vaikutus länsimaiden vientiin (ETLA Raportti no. 95).
Block, F. (2016). Beyond embedded autonomy: Conceptualizing the work of developmental states. In Y. W. Chu (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp. 57–72). Palgrave Macmillan.
Blumi, I. (2011). Reinstating the Ottomans. Alternative Balkan modernities, 1800-1912. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2016). Models of developmental state (Sao Paulo School of Economics Working Paper 426). http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/papers/2016/350-Models-developmental-state-TD-426.pdf
Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2013). The revolutionary power of peripheral agencies: Explaining radical policy innovation in Finland and Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1219–1245.
Bhambra, G. K. (2016). Comparative historical sociology and the state: Problems of method. Cultural Sociology, 10(3), 335–351.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1972). Finlandization in section: Helsinki’s experience with Moscow (Reference Title: ESAU LVI. RSS No. 0059/72).
Danielson, J. R. (1892). Suomen sisällinen itsenäisyys: Jatkuvien hyökkäysten torjumiseksi. Werner Söderström.
Evans, P. (2014). The capability enhancing developmental state: Concepts and national trajectories. In E. M. Kim & P. H. Kim (Eds.), The South Korean development experience: Beyond aid (pp. 83–110). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fellman, S. (2019). Miten Suomi Muuttui? In Laine et al. (Eds.), Vaurastumisen Vuodet: Suomen taloushistoria teollistumisen jälkeen (pp. 293–303). Gaudeamus.
Fosu, A. K. (Ed.). (2013). Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries. Oxford University Press.
Haapala, P. (2009). Modernisation of Finland 1800-2000. In M. Perkiö (Ed.), Perspectives to global social development (pp. 48–66). Tampereen Yliopistopaino.
Isohookana-Asunmaa, T. (2009). Kostamus – esimerkki politiikan ja kaupan toisiinsa kietoutumisesta. Faravid, 33, 227–245.
Jessop, B. (2013). The developmental state in an era of finance-dominated accumulation. In C. Yin- Wah (Ed.), The Asian developmental state: Reexaminations and new departures (pp. 57–72). Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, C. (1999). The developmental state: Odyssey of a concept. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 32–60). Cornell University Press.
Jussila, O. (1984). Finland’s progress to national statehood within the development of the Russian Empire’s administrative system. Studia Historica 16: Nationality and nationalism in Italy and Finland from the mid-19th century to 1918. SHS.
Jussila, O. (1987). Maakunnasta valtioksi: Suomen valtion synty. WSOY.
Jäntti, M., Saari, J. P., & Vartiainen, J. (2006). Growth and equity in Finland (UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2006/06).
Jäntti, M., & Vartiainen, J. (2013). The Finnish developmental state and its growth regime. In A. K Fosu (Ed.), Development success: Historical accounts from more advanced countries (pp. 23–42). Oxford University Press.
Kekkonen, U. (November 27, 1960). Speech at the Paasikivi society (Accessed through the National Library of Finland’s Doria database).
Kelly, R. E. (2008). No ‘Return to the state’: Dependency and developmentalism against neoliberalism. Development in Practice, 18(3), 319–332.
Kettunen, P. (2019). Perifeerinen avantgardismi kansallisen toimijuuden suuntaajana. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 201–217). Gaudeamus.
Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (Eds.). (2019). Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana. Gaudeamus.
Koponen, J., & Saaritsa, S. (2019). Suomi, historia, kehitys. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 11–31). Gaudeamus.
Korhonen, J. (2019). Empire, democracy, state and nation: Sociological occlusions of the Russian and German Empires (Doctoral Dissertation). Brown University, RI, USA.
Korhonen, J., & Niemeläinen, J. (2017). Solidarity and competition in the European Union. Theory reconstruction from an extended case study of welfare state emigration. Cahiers RESuME 7. https://doi.org/10.25517/RESuME-3KxjkBR-2017
Kuisma, M. (2010). Sodasta syntynyt: Itsenäisen Suomen synty Sarajevon laukauksista Tarton Rauhaan. WSOY.
Kähönen, A. (2019). Vallankumouksen ja nationalismin ristipaineessa 1905-1932: Suomi hauraana valtiona. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 295–311). Gaudeamus.
Lee, Y. W. (2008). The Japanese challenge to neoliberalism: Who and what is ’normal’ in the history of the world economy? Review of International Political Economy, 15(4), 506–534.
Matala, S., & Sahari, A. (2017). Small nation, big ships winter navigation and technological nationalism in a peripheral country, 1878-1978. History and Technology 33(2), 220–248.
O Riain, S. (2000). The flexible developmental state: Globalization, information technology, and the “Celtic Tiger”. Politics & Society, 28(2), 157–193.
Ornston, D., & Vail, M. I. (2016). The developmental state in developed societies: Power, partnership, and divergent patterns of intervention in France and Finland. Comparative Politics 49(1), 1–21.
Osten-Sacken, W. B. V. D. (1909) (translated 1912). The Legal position of the grand-duchy of Finland in the Russian Empire. Lamley.
Saaritsa, S. (2019). Miten Suomi lakkasi olemasta kehitysmaa? Taloudellinen ja inhimillinen kehitys 1800- ja 1900-luvuilla. In J. Koponen & S. Saaritsa (Eds.), Nälkämaasta hyvinvointivaltioksi: Suomi kehityksen kiinniottajana (pp. 33–50). Gaudeamus.
Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledgebased economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92–109.
Snyder, T., & Younger, K. (Eds.). (2018). The Balkans as Europe, 1821-1914. University of Rochester Press.
Talvitie, H. (2020). Juho Kusti Paasikivi Poliitikkona ja Historianfilosofina. https://www. historianswithoutborders.fi/juho-kusti-paasikivi-poliitikkona-ja-historianfilosofina/
Vares, V. (2011). The western powers and Finland during the Cold War: What was “Finlandization”? Arhivele Totalitarismului, XIX(3–4), 147–163.
Vartiainen, J. (1999). The economics of successful state intervention in industrial transformation. In M. Woo-Cumings (Ed.), The developmental state (pp. 200–234). Cornell University Press.
Zimmerman, A. (2006). Decolonizing Weber. Postcolonial Studies, 9(1), 53–79.