___

• Antoncic, B., and Hisrich, R.D. (2004). Corporate Entrepreneurial Contingencies and Organizational Wealth Creation, The Journal of Management Development, 23(5/6), 518–550. https://doi/10.1108/02621710410541114.
• Arıkboğa, Ş. (2003). Entelektüel Sermaye. İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.
• Atak, M. ve Atik, İ. (2007). Örgütlerde Sürekli Eğitimin Önemi ve Öğrenen Örgüt Oluşturma Sürecine Etkisi, Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi, 3(1), 63-70.
• Attar, M. (2014). Üst Düzey Yöneticilerin Liderlik Özelliklerinin Örgütsel Ustalık Düzeyine Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Selçuk Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi,Konya),http://acikerisimarsiv.selcuk.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5909’den erişildi.
• Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity in new product innovation, Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61−83. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30166552
• Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
• Bayam, B.Y. (2016). Örgütsel Öğrenme Sürecinde, Örgüt Kültürünün, Çalışanların Öğrenen Örgüt Algılarına Etkisi: Güreş Group, (Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Manisa),https://tezarsivi.com/orgutsel-ogrenme-surecinde-orgut-kulturunun-calisanlarin-ogrenen-orgut-algilarina-etkisi-gures-group ‘den erişildi.
• Benner, M.J., and Tushman, M.L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi/10.2307/30040711
• Bierly, P., Damanpour, F., and Santoro, M. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x
• Bodwell, W. and Chermark, T.J. (2012). Organizational Ambidexterity: Integrating Deliberate and Emergent Strategy with Scenario Planning, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.004
• Büyükozan, G. (2002). Entelektüel Sermaye Yönetimi, KalDer Forum Dergisi, 2(6), 35-44.
• Cai, L., Zhu, X.M., and Liu, Y. (2011). Study on the impact of EO on resource acquisition, Studies in Science of Science, 29(4), 601–609. Retrieved from: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-KXYJ201104016.htm
• Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., and Shashi. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 141,172–194. https://doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.014
• Chen, J., Zhu. Z. and Xie, H.Y. (2004). Measuring Intellectual Capital: A New Model And Empirical Study, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410513003
• Covin, J., and Miles, M. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurial and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurial: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47-63.
• Çömlek, O., Kitapçı, H., Çelik, V., and Özşahin, M. (2012). The effects of organizational learning capacity on firm innovative performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 367-374.
• Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
• Dzinkovvski, R. (2000). The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction, Management Accounting. 78(2), 32-36.
• Efe, M.N. (2015). Girişimsel Yönelim, Entelektüel Sermaye ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Yeteneklerinin Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkileri, (Beykent Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul), https://tezarsivi.com/girisimsel-yonelim-entelektuel-sermaye-ve-orgutsel-ogrenme-yeteneklerinin-firma-performansi-uzerine-etkileri ‘den erişildi.
• Fettahlıoğlu, Ö.O., ve Afşar, A. (2015). Öğrenen Örgüt Boyutlarına Yönelik Algılamaların, Entelektüel Sermaye Algılaması Üzerindeki Yansımaları, International Journal of Social Science, 35(5), 287-300.
• Fiske, D.W. (1982). Convergent-discriminant validation in measurements and Research strategies, D. Brinberg ve L. Kidder (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Fiş, A.M., ve Wasti, S.A. (2009). Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütlerin Girişimcilik Yönelimi İlişkisi, ODTÜ Geliştirme Dergisi, 35(Özel Sayı), 127-164.
• Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., and Shalley, C.E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159793
• Hair J. F. J., Black C.W., Babin J.B., Anderson, E.R., and Tatham, L. R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall Inc.
• Hughes, M., and Morgan, R. (2007). Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00519.x
• İpçioğlu, İ., ve Tunca, M.Z. (2002). Entelektüel Sermayenin Yönetilmesi, Ölçülmesi ve Firma Değerine Etkisi, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2(1), 175-198
• Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. (1984). Lisrel VI. Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods, Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software.
• Kang, S.C., Snell, S.A., and Swart, J. (2012). Options-based HRM, intellectual capital, and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms' practice group. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21484
• Khalili, H., Nejadhussein, S., and Fazel, A. (2013). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on innovative performance: Study of a petrochemical company in Iran. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 5(3), 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKIC-09-2013-0017
• Kıngır, S., ve Mesci, M. (2007). Öğrenen Organizasyonlar, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(19), 63-81.
• Kitapçı. H., and Çelik, V. (2013). Ambidexterity and Firm Productivity Performance: The Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning Capacity, 9th International Strategic Management Conference, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 99, 1105–1113.
• Kocapınar, E.B. (2010). Entelektüel Sermayenin Girişimsel Oryantasyona Etkisi ve Firma Performansıyla İlişkisi, (Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli), https://tezarsivi.com/entelektuel-sermayenin-girisimsel-oryantasyona-etkisi-ve-firma-performansi-ile-iliskisi ‘den erişildi.
• Koç, H., ve Topaloğlu, M. (2010). Yönetim Bilimi, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 1. Baskı, Ankara.
• Leana, C.R. and Van Buren, H.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices, Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/259141
• Li, Y.H., Huang, J.W., and Tsai, M.T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.004
• Lin, H,E., and McDonough, E.F.(2011). Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity, Ieee Transactions On Engineering Management, 58(3), 497-509 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2092781
• Lubatkin, M.H., Şimşek, Z., Ling, Y., ve Viega, J.F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
• Lumpkin, G.T., and Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
• Lumpkin, G.T., Cogliser, C.C., and Shneider, D.R. (2009). Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: an Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective, Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 33(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00280.x
• Marsick, V.J., and Watkins K.E. (2003). Demonstrating the Value of an Organization’s Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources Journal. 5(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
• Meydan, C.H., ve Şeşen, H.(2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Mische, M.A. (2001). Strategic Renewal, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
• Nazari, J., Herremans, I.M., Isaac, R.G., Manassian, A., and Kline, T.J.B.(2011). Organizational Culture, Climate and IC: An Interaction Analaysis, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 224-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111123403
• Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method (Resources for the Future. Washington, DC). Retrieved from https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~rcarson/papers/UsingSurveysToValuePublicGoods.pdf
• Mooi. E., and Sarstedt, M. (2011). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. New York: Springer. Na, F., Ma, Q. H., Janine, B., and Patrick, F. (2016). Intellectual capital and organizational ambidexterity in Chinese and Irish professional services firms. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 3(2), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2016-0021
• Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
• O’Reilly, C.A. and Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/07-088.pdf
• Özkoç, Ö. (2018). Hastanelerde Marka Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Hastaların Marka Denkliği Algısı ve Hastane Tercihine Etkisi, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul), https://tezarsivi.com/hastanelerde-marka-yonetimi-uygulamalarinin-hastalarin-marka-denkligi-algisi-ve-hastane-tercihine-etkisi ‘den erişildi.
• Özyılmaz, A., and Eser. S. (2013). Ortak Metod Varyansı Nedir? Nasıl Kontrol Edilebilir?, 21.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi. 1. Basım. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 500-508.
• Panagopoulos, G. (2016). Aspects of Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 10(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.20460
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., and Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it, Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
• Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., and Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance, Organizational Research Methods, 12, 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
• Sayan, E. (2006). Otomotiv Sektöründe Öğrenen Örgütler, (Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kocaeli), https://www.ulusaltezmerkezi.net/otomotiv-sektorunde-ogrenen-organizasyonlar/ ‘den erişildi.
• Senge, P.M. (2002). Beşinci Disiplin. [Fifth Discipline], (Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahmet Doğukan, Trans.), İstanbul, Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
• Stam, W., and Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy Management Journal, 51, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.30744031
• Stevenson, H.H., and Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurial: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 17-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486667
• Stewart, T.A. (1997). Entelektüel sermaye: Kuruluşların yeni zenginliği. [Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organization], (N. El Hüseyni, Trans.), İstanbul: Mess Yayınları.
• Subramaniam, M. and Youndt, M.A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities, The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159670
• Şahin, F. (2012). Örgüt Kültürü ve Entelektüel Sermaye İlişkisi: Marmara Bölgesindeki Otel İşletmeleri Örneği, (Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bilecik), http://acikkaynak.bilecik.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11552/112 ‘den erişildi.
• Şimşek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
• Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., and Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods, Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
• Tran, Q.H. (2013). Top Management Team Behavioral Integration, Organizational Ambidexterity, And Small Firms’ Performance: The Moderating Effect Of Entrepreneurial Orientation, (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3598513).
• Turner, N., Swart, J., and Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
• Tushman, M.L., and O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
• Yu, R., Jiefang, H.E., and Liu, Z. (2014). The Co-evolution of Organizational Culture Transformation and Ambidextrous Capability: A Strategic Orientation Perspective, Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2(2), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.2.2.102-105
• Wang, C.L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00246.x
• Wang, K.Y., Hermens, A., Huang, K.P., and Chelliah, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Learning On Smes’ Innovation, The International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 7(4), 71-81. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8c74/eeb59a4694e2fb67f3716203f31d4249d7ea.pdf
• Wasko, M.M.. and Faraj, S.(2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667