MODELING OF ENTRAINED-FLOW COAL GASIFICATION BY AN EQUILIBRIUM EULERIAN-EULERIAN TWO-PHASE FLOW FORMULATION

Kömür tozu gazlaştırılmasının sayısal simülasyonu için, iki-fazlı akışın Euler-Euler formülasyonuna dayanan bir matematiksel model önerilmiştir. Halihazırda incelenen yaklaşım, gaz fazını Euler ve parçacık fazını Lagrange referans sistemi ile işlemekte ve genellikle kullanılmakta olan Euler-Lagrange yöntemlerinden farklı olarak, iki faz için de Euler tanımını kullanmaktadır. Bizim uygulamamızda, fazlar arasında mekanik ve termik denge kabulü ile model sadeleştirilmiştir. Bu sadeleştirme, parçacık fazının karışımın bir bileşeni olarak göründügü, ve sadece tek bir takım momentum ve enerji denklemlerinin çözümünü gerektiren bir formülasyonu mümkün kılmaktadır. Model, validasyon için, deneysel verilerin ve başka yazarların Euler-Lagrange neticelerinin mevcut olduğu bir probleme uygulanmıştır. Deneylerle ve diğer yazarların Euler-Lagrange hesaplarıyla yapılan karşılaştırmalar mevcut Euler-Euler yaklaşımının Euler-Lagrange modeli ile mukayese edilebilir bir hassasiyet sağladığını ve değişen çalışma koşulları altındaki trendleri benzer şekilde öngörebildigini göstermektedir. Önerilen Euler-Euler formülasyonu, buna ek olarak, konvansiyonel Euler-Lagrange formülasyonuna kıyasla, sayısal olarak daha sağlam olduğu ve daha iyi yakınsama özellikleri gösterdiği için, kömür tozu gazlaştırıcılarının sayısal simülasyonunda ilgi çekici bir seçenek olarak kabul edilebilir

KÖMÜR TOZU GAZLAŞTIRILMASININ BİR DENGE EULER-EULERİKİ-FAZLI AKIŞFORMÜLASYONUİLE MODELLENMESİ

A mathematical model is proposed for the numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasification, based on an Eulerian-Eulerian description of the two-phase flow. In contrast to the commonly employed EulerianLagrangian procedures, which treat the gas phase by a Eulerian and the particulate phase by a Lagrangian frame of reference, the presently investigated approach applies a Eulerian description to both phases. In our implementation, the model is simplified assuming a mechanical and thermal equilibrium between the phases. This leads to a formulation, where the particulate phase appears, merely, as a species of a mixture, for which a single set of momentum and energy equations needs to be solved. For validation, the model is applied to a case, where experimental data and Eulerian-Lagrangian results of other authors exist. Comparisons with the experiments and the Eulerian-Lagrangian prediction of other authors show that the present Eulerian-Eulerian approach provides a comparable accuracy to the Eulerian-Lagrangian modelling and can similarly predict the trends under varying operating conditions. Since the proposed Eulerian-Eulerian formulation is additionally numerically more robust and exhibit better convergence properties compared to the conventional Eulerian-Lagrangian formulation, it can be considered as an interesting alternative in the numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers

___

  • Ajilkumar, A., Sundararajan, T. and Shet, U. S. P., , Numerical Modeling of a Steam-Assisted Tubular Coal Gasifier, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 48, 308-321.
  • ANSYS Fluent, Release 15, www.ansys.com.
  • Badzioch, S., Hawskley and P. G. W., 1970, Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Pulverized Coal Particles, Int. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Develop., 9, 521-530.
  • Baum, M. M. and Street, P. J., 1971, Predicting the Combustion Behaviour of Coal Particles, Comb. Sci. Technology, 3, 231-243.
  • Benim, A. C., 1988, A Finite Element Solution of Radiative Heat Transfer in Participating Media utilizing the Moment Method, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engg., 67, 1-14.
  • Benim, A, C., Epple, B. andKrohmer, B., 2005, Modelling of Pulverised Coal Combustion by a Eulerian-Eulerian Two-Phase Flow Formulation, Progressin Computational Fluid Dynamics, 5, 345-361.
  • Brown, B.W., Smoot, L.D., Smith, P.J. andHedman, P.O., 1988, Measurementand Prediction of Entrained-Flow Gasification Process, AIChE J.,34, 435-46.
  • Chen, W. H., Du, S. W. and Yang, J. H., 2007, VolatileRelease and Particle Formation Characteristics of Injected Pulverized Coal in Blast Furnace, Energy Convers. Manage.,48, 2025-2033.
  • Chen, C., Horio, M. andKojima, T., 1999, Numerical Simulation of Entrained Flow Coal Gasifiers. Part I: Modelling of Coal Gasification in an Entrained Flow Gasifier, Chemical Engineering Science, 55, 3861-3874.
  • Choi, Y. C., Li, X. Y., Park, T. J., Kim, J. H., Lee andJ. G., 2001, Numerical Study on the Coal Gasification Characteristics in An Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier, Fuel, 80, 2193-2201.
  • Descamps, C., Bouallou C., and Kanniche, M.,2008, Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plant Including CO2Removal, Energy, 33, 874-881.
  • Durbin, P.A. andReif, B.A.P., 2003, Statistical Theory and Modelling for Turbulent Flows, Wiley, NewYork.
  • Elgobashi, S. E. andAbou-Arab, T. W., 1983, A Two-Equation Turbulence Model for Two-Phase Flows, Phys. Fluids, 26, 931-938.
  • Field, M. A., Gill, D. W., Morgan, B. B. andHawskley, P. G. W., 1967, Combustion of Pulverized Coal, The British Coal Utilization Research Assoc., Leatherhead.
  • Giuffrida, A., Romano, C. M. andLozza G., 2011, Thermodynamic Analysis of Air-Blown Gasification for IGCC Applications, Applied Energy, 88, 3949-3958.
  • Govind, R. andShah, J., 1984, Modeling and Simulationof an Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier, AIChE J., 30, 79-91.
  • Halama S. and Spliethoff, H, 2015, Numerical Simulation of Entrained Flow Gasification: Reaction Kinetics and Char Structure Evaluation, Fuel Processing Technology, 138, 314-324.
  • Hemsath, K. H., 1969, Zur Berechnung der Flammenstrahlung, Dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
  • Higman, C. andvan der Burgt M., 2003, Gasification, 1st edition, Gulf Professional Publications, Amsterdam.
  • Hill, S. C. andSmoot, L.D., 1993, A Comprehensive Three-Dimensional Model for Simulation of Combustion System: PCGC-3, Energy & Fuels, 30, 874-883.
  • Jeong, H. J., Seo, D. K. andHwang, J., 2014, CFD Modeling for Coal Size Effect on Coal Gasification in a Two-Stage Commercial Entrained-Bed Gasifier with an Improved Char Gasification Model, Applied Energy, 123, 29-36.
  • Kuo, K.K., 2005, Principles of Combustion, John Wiley & Sons.Launder, B. E. andSpalding, D. B., 1974, The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engg., 3, 269-289
  • Liu, G.-S., Rezaei, H. R., Lucas, J. A., Harris, D. J. and Wall,T. F., 2000, Modelling of a Pressurised Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier: The Effect of Reaction Kinetics and Char Structure, Fuel, 79, 1767-1779.
  • Magnussen, B. F., Hjertager, B. H., 1976, On Mathematical Modelling of Turbulent Combustion with SpecialEmphasis on Soot Formation and Combustion, Proceedings of the Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 719-729.
  • Nguyen, T. D. B., Seo, M. W., Lim, Y-I., Song B.-H., Kim, S.-D., 2012, CFD Simulation with Experiments in a Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed Gasifier,Computers & Chemical Engineering, 36, 48-56.
  • Owen, P. R.,1969, Pneumatic Transport, J. Fluid. Mech., 39, 407-432.
  • Shoko E., McLellan B., Dicks A. and da Costa J. D., 2006, Hydrogen from Coal: Production and Utilization Technologies, International Journal of Coal Geology, 65, 213-222.
  • Slezak, A., Kuhlman, J.M., Shadle, L. J., Spenik, J. and Shi, S., 2010, CFD Simulation of Entrained-Flow Coal Gasification: Coal Particle Density/Size Fraction Effects, Powder Technology, 203, 98-108.
  • Smoot L. D. andSmith P. J., 1985, Coal Combustion and Gasification, Plenum Press, New York.
  • Spalding, D. B., 1982, The 'Shadow' Method of Particle-Size Calculation in Two-Phase Combustion, Proceedings of the nineteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion,The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 941-952.
  • Vincente, W., Ochoa, S., Aguillon, J. and Barrios, E., 2008, A Eulerian Model for the Simulation of an Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier, Applied Thermal Engineering, 5, 345-361.
  • Watanabe, H. and Otaka, M., 2006, Numerical Simulation of Coal Gasification in Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier, Fuel, 55, 1935-1943.
  • Wen,C.Y. andChaung T.Z., 1979, Entrainment Coal Gasification Modeling, Ind.Eng.Chem.Process, 18,684-695.
  • Xue, Q. and Fox, R. O., 2014, Multi-Fluid CFD Modeling of Biomass Gasification in Polydisperse Fluidized-Bed Gasifiers,Powder Technology, 254, 187-198.
  • Yılmazoğlu, M. Z. and Durmaz, A., 2012, Thermodynamic Analysis of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant, Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi / J. of Thermal Science and Technology, 32, 43-53.
Isı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3615
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1977
  • Yayıncı: TÜRK ISI BİLİMİ VE TEKNİĞİ DERNEĞİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Değişken Devirli Hermetik Kompresör Yağlama Sistemi İçin Akış Modelinin Analitik ve Sayısal Olarak Karşılaştırılması

Mustafa OZSIPAHI, Sertac CADIRCI, Hasan GUNES, Kemal SARIOGLU

SOMA TERMİK SANTRALİNDE KÖMÜR DEĞİRMEN KANAL SİSTEMİNİN SANTRAL PERFORMANS TESTLERİ YARDIMIYLA NÜMERİK VE DENEYSEL OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Ali Bahadır OLCAY, Murat KAHRAMAN, Selçuk ATAŞ

ENHANCEMENT OF NATURAL CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER OF PIN FIN HAVING PERFORATED WITH INCLINATION ANGLE

Mehmet Sait SÖYLEMEZ, Hisham H. JASIM

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF WIND PRESSURE FIELDS ON BUILDINGS WITH GABLED ROOFS HAVING DIFFERENT PITCH ANGLES

Yücel ÖZMEN, Ertan BAYDAR

BİLİMSEL TERMODİNAMİĞİN EVRİMİ: TARİH

Sadık KAKAÇ

Alttan ve Üstten Üflemeli Kabin Tipi Kurutucuda Nane Kurutulmasının Deneysel Olarak İncelenmesi

Tansel KOYUN, Hülya BAYHAN YILMAZ

HAVUCUN KURUMA KİNETİĞİ ÜZERİNE OZMOTİK DEHİDRASYONUN ETKİSİ

Ahmet KAYA, Orhan AYDIN, Sevgi KOLAYLI

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF A 5 kW POROUS MEDIUM BURNERWITH AN INTEGRATED HEAT EXCHANGER

Onur TUNÇER, A Cihat BAYTAŞ, Tanju ERGEN

DİREKT ENJEKSİYONLU BİR DİZEL MOTORUNDA DİZEL VE JET-A1 YAKIT KARIŞIMLARININ YANMA, MOTOR PERFORMANSI VE EGZOZ EMİSYONLARINA ETKİLERİ ÜZERİNE DENEYSEL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Hamit SOLMAZ, Hasan YAMIK, Ahmet UYUMAZ, Seyfi POLAT ve Emre YILMAZ

OPERATINGTEMPERATURESOFTHESOLARCELLSUSED INTHECONCENTRATOR SYSTEM WITH RADIATING PLATES

Kurşad Melih GULEREN, Nevsan SENGIL, Uluc SENGIL