PHILOSOPHICAL & PSYCHOANALYTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE WOMEN'S VIEW IN EASTERN AND WEST CIVILIZATIONS
The aim of this paper is to compare the perception of women in Eastern and Western civilizations in terms of their philosophical perspective and psychoana-lytic analysis. To this end, the position of masculine and feminine genealogies in the established belief systems, philosophical and psychoanalytic analyzes of Eastern and Western civilizations is discussed and the place and importance of women in Eastern and Western civilizations are compared in terms of their tradi-tions, beliefs, historical and cultural backgrounds. This leads to a very important psychoanalytic rift in terms of gender and women's researches: the distinction between genus the second sex as the perception of women in the West and ‘the other sex’ as the perception of women in the Eastern wisdom.
Keywords:
Gender, Women's Studies, Second Gender, Other Gender Perception of Women in Eastern and Western Civilizations,
___
- Irigaray, L. (1893) “Between East and West. From Singularity to Commu-nity”, translated by Stephen Pluhácek, Columbia University Press.
- Fromm, E. (1972) “Zen-Buddhismus und Psychoanalyse”, Suhrkamp.
- Direk, Z. (2018) “Cinsel Farkın İnşası. Felsefi Bir Problem Olarak Cinsi-yet”, Metis yay.
- Giddens, A. (2001) “Entfesselte Welt: wie die Globalisierung unser Leben verändert”, Suhrkamp Verlag.
- Irigaray, L. (1985) “Speculum of the Other Woman”, Cornell University Press.
- Irigaray, L. (1980) “Speculum, Spiegel des anderen Geschlechts”, Brosc-hiert.
- De Beauvoir, S. (1998) “Das andere Geschlecht. Sitte und Sexus der Frau”, Rowohlt.
- ISSN: 2602-3288
- Başlangıç: 2017
- Yayıncı: Tuncay AYDEMİR