Faruk YEŞİLDAL

Numerical Optimization of Heat Transfer Parameters in a Pipe with Decaying Swirl Flow Generators Using Response Surface Methodology

In this study; the heat transfer parameters (Reynolds number, helix angle and pitch) of an axial swirl flow generator attached to the pipe inlet were numerically optimized. The Response Surface Method Central Composite Design Face Centered (CCDFC) was used for this purpose. Three different parameters were examined at 3 levels with 20 analyzes performed in Fluent. The heat transfer coefficient (h) was determined as the objective function. As a result of the analysis, the square effects of Reynolds number and the combined effect of Reynolds number and swirl angle () were found to be statistically significant. Optimum results were obtained for the Reynolds number of 15000, for 15° the swirl angle with the pitch being 2mm. In addition, a mathematical model is proposed for the heat transfer coefficient, which is determined as a response function.

Keywords:

Swirl flow generator, CFD, Response surface methodology Optimization,

PDF

___

[1] Siddique H, Hoque MSB, Ali M. Effect of swirl flow on heat transfer characteristics in a circular pipe. In: AIP Conference Proceedings: AIP Publishing LLC. p. 50028.
[2] Liu S, Sakr M. A comprehensive review on passive heat transfer enhancements in pipe exchangers. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews (2013) 19:64–81.
[3] Bali T, Sarac BA. Experimental investigation of decaying swirl flow through a circular pipe for binary combination of vortex generators. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (2014) 53:174–179.
[4] Chen B, Ho K, Xiao H, Abakr YA, Chan A. The effects of swirling decaying flow towards pipe entry length and heat transfer in an annular pipe. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2018) 123:668–677.
[5] Aydin O, Avci M, Markal B, Yazici MY. An experimental study on the decaying swirl flow in a tube. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (2014) 55:22–28.
[6] Bilen K, Tokgoz N, Solmaz İ, Balta T. Thermo-hydraulic performance of tube with decaying swirl flow generators. Applied Thermal Engineering (2022) 200:117643.
[7] Kurtbaş İ, Gülçimen F, Kılıçarslan A, Kaya M. Effect of swirl generator inserted into a tube on exergy transfer: decaying flow. Experimental Heat Transfer (2014) 27(5):472–487.
[8] Rocha AD, Bannwart AC, Ganzarolli MM. Numerical and experimental study of an axially induced swirling pipe flow. International journal of heat and fluid flow (2015) 53:81–90.
[9] Saqr KM, Wahid MA. Effects of swirl intensity on heat transfer and entropy generation in turbulent decaying swirl flow. Applied Thermal Engineering (2014) 70(1):486–493.
[10] Yan T, Qu J, Sun X, Chen Y, Hu Q, Li W. Numerical evaluation on the decaying swirling flow in a multi-lobed swirl generator. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics (2020) 14(1):1198–1214.
[11] Fokeer S, Lowndes I, Kingman S. An experimental investigation of pneumatic swirl flow induced by a three lobed helical pipe. International journal of heat and fluid flow (2009) 30(2):369–379.
[12] Banerjee C, Urankar S, Raikar S, Suresh D. Numerical Study of Decaying Swirling Flow in an Annulus.
[13] Yilmaz M, Çomakli Ö, Yapici S. Enhancement of heat transfer by turbulent decaying swirl flow. Energy conversion and management (1999) 40(13):1365–1376.
[14] Helgadóttir Á, Lalot S, Beaubert F, Pálsson H. Mesh Twisting Technique for Swirl Induced Laminar Flow Used to Determine a Desired Blade Shape. Applied Sciences (2018) 8(10):1865.
[15] Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments: John Wiley & Sons (2016).
[16] Yoğurtçu H. Optimization of microwave apple drying using response surface method. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, Accepted Manuscript (2019) 34(3):1365–1376.
[17] Sabreena AN, Azma Y, Mohamad O. response surface methodology for optimisation of parameters for extraction of Stevia rebaudiana using water, H2O. IIOAB (2017) 47:459–466.
[18] Balachandran M, Devanathan S, Muraleekrishnan R, Bhagawan SS. Optimizing properties of nanoclay–nitrile rubber (NBR) composites using face centred central composite design. Materials & Design(2012) 35:854–862.
[19] Akers MD. Exploring, Analysing and Interpeting Data with Minitab 18: Compass Publishing (2018).
[20] Gelis K, Akyurek EF. Entropy generation of different panel radiator types: Design of experiments using response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of Building Engineering (2021) 41:102369.
[21] Aydar AY. Utilization of response surface methodology in optimization of extraction of plant materials. Statistical approaches with emphasis on design of experiments applied to chemical processes (2018):157–169.
[22] Yesildal F, Ozakin AN, Yakut K. Optimization of operational parameters for a photovoltaic panel cooled by spray cooling. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (2021).