Öğretmeye Yönelik Hedef Yönelimi Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması

Bu çalışmada, Öğretmeye Yönelik Hedef Yönelimi Ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışmaları yapılarak Türkçeye uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 584 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Ölçeğin orijinali (Goal Orientations for Teaching) 5 faktör ve 21 maddeden oluşmuş olup, bu çalışmada gerçekleştirilen açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda özdeğeri 1 ve üzeri olan 4 faktör elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen bu faktörlerden Beceri Yaklaşımı faktörünün güvenirliği α=.787 ve varyansı %24.56; Ustalık faktörünün güvenirliği α=.638 ve varyansı %15.70; İşten Kaçınma faktörünün güvenirliği α=.605 ve varyansı %8.06; Öğrenci İlişkileri faktörünün güvenirliği α=.673 ve varyansı %6.72; ölçeğin tamamına ait güvenirlik ise α=.761 ve varyans %55 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda 4 faktörlü ve 15 maddelik ölçeğin iyi uyum değerlerine (χ²/sd=1.43; RMSEA=.027; GFI=.98; AGFI=.96; CFI=.98; TLI=.98) sahip olduğu görülmüştür. İngilizce orijinal formu 5 faktör ve 21 maddeden oluşan ölçeğin 4 faktörlü ve 15 maddelik Türkçe Formu güvenilir ve geçerli olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Ölçeğin öğretmenlerin öğretmeye yönelik hedef yönelimlerini belirlemek için kullanılabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

___

  • KAYNAKÇA
  • Ames, C. (1986). Effective motivation: The contribution of the learning environment. In R.S. Feldman (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Education (pp. 235–256). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and students motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
  • Anderman, E.M., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Roeser, R., Wigfield, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 76–95.
  • Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 200-215.
  • Butler, R. (2007). Teachers’ achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers’ help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 241–252.
  • Butler, R. (2012). Striving to connect: Extending an achievement goal approach to teacher motivation to include relational goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 726-742.
  • Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2008).Achievement goals for teaching as predictors of students’ perceptions of instructional practices and students’ help seeking and cheating. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 453–467.
  • Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2014). Striving to connect and striving to learn: Influences of relational and mastery goals for teaching on teacher behaviors and student interest and help seeking. International Journal of Educational Research, 65, 41–53.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Cho, Y.J., & Shim, S.S. (2013). Predicting teachers’ achievement goals for teaching: The role of perceived school goal structure and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 12-21.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
  • Dresel, M., Fasching, M.S., Steuer, G., Nitsche, S., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Relations between teachers’ goal orientations, their instructional practices and students’ motivation. Psychology, 4(7), 572-584.
  • Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040.
  • Elliot, A. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. Maehr, & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 143-179). Greenwich: JAI.
  • Elliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
  • Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoiding achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.
  • Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
  • Eroğlu, A. (2009). Faktör analizi. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (ss. 321–331). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Goetz, T., Nett, U.E., & Hall, N.C. (2013). Self-regulated learning. In N.C. Hall, & T. Goetz (Eds.), Emotion, Motivation and Self-Regulation: A Handbook for Teachers (pp. 57-122). Canada: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Higgins, E.T., & Kruglanski, A. (2000). Motivational science: The nature and functions of wanting. In E.T. Higgins, & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Motivational Science: Social and Personality Perspectives (pp. 1–20). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayım Basım Dağıtım.
  • Kucsera, J.V., Roberts, R, Walls, S., Walker, J., & Svinicki, M. (2011). Goal Orientation towards Teaching (GOTT) Scale. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(5), 597–610.
  • Leondari, A., & Gialamas, V. (2002). Implicit theories, goal orientations, and perceived competence: Impact on students' achievement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 279-291.
  • Meydan, C.H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Nitsche, S., Dickhäuser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2011). Rethinking teachers’ goal orientations: Conceptual and methodological enhancements. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 574-586.
  • Özdamar, K. (2011a). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 1. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • Özdamar, K. (2011b). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi 2. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153-171.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An Achievement goal theory perspective on ıssues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 92–104.
  • Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
  • Pintrich, P.R., & D.H. Schunk. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
  • Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (2004). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Seçer, İ. (2013). SPSS ve LISREL ile Pratik Veri Analizi (1. baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions of the school goal structure: Relations with teachers’ goal orientations, work engagement, and job satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 199–209.
  • Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.
  • Throndsen, I., & Turmo, A. (2013). Primary mathematics teachers’ goal orientations and student achievement. Instructional Science, 41, 307-322.
  • Wlodkowski, R.J. (1978). Motivation and Teaching: A Practical Guide. Washington: National Education Association.
  • Wolters, C.A., & Daugherty, S.G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 181-193.
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation (ss. 13-35). USA: Academic Press.