ASEAN ve Türkiye İlişkilerine Bir Bakış: Güneydoğu Asya'nın Yükselen Birliği Olarak ASEAN

Güneydoğu Asya’da, öncüllerine nispeten devamlılık sağlayabilen Güneydoğu Asya Uluslar Birliği (ASEAN), her geçengün daha da ciddi adımlar atmış ve bölgesel, aynı zamanda küresel anlamda büyük ekonomilerin dikkatini çekecek noktayaçok erken tarihlerde ulaşmış bir bölgesel güçtür. Temel olarakekonomik bir birlik olarak ortaya çıkan ASEAN zaman içerisinde bu gücünü siyasi bir güce de çevirebilmeyi başarmış ve bukonuda adımlar atmıştır. Türkiye açısından coğrafi olarak sonderece uzak olan bu bölgeye, dünya ekonomilerinin ilgisi, birliğin erken dönemlerinden itibaren artmasına karşın, gerek ekonomik ve gerekse siyasi krizlerin ve çalkantıların pençesindenbir türlü kurtulamayan Türkiye'nin dış politika yüzünü AvrupaBirliğinden çevirememesi, güneydoğu Asya’ya da yeterinceönem verememesine sebep olmuştur. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'ningüneydoğu Asya ile olan ilişkileri değerlendirilmiş ve Türkiye'nin tamamen kaçırmadığı ancak güçlü bağlar için çok geçkaldığı ASEAN ile ilişkilerine değinilecektir.

A Review to ASEAN and Turkey Relations: ASEAN as Southeast Asia's Raising Union

In Southeast Asia, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which has been able to maintain continuity according to its predecessors, is taking ever more serious steps. It is a regional power that has reached the point where it attracts the attention of the powerful economies in the region and at the same time at the global level. Initially, ASEAN, which has emerged as an economic union, has succeeded in turning this power into political power and took the necessary steps in this regard. For Turkey, this region is an area that is extremely distant geographically. On the contrary, Turkey could not get rid of from the turmoil of the economic and political crisis, to turn its political view to Southeast Asia and in reaction to this, Turkey's national perception of foreign policy could not turn its head from the west. Turkey, as a natural consequence of it, did not give enough attention to Southeast Asia. In this study, Turkey, which has been too late to develop strong ties, relations with Southeast Asia, was evaluated in the framework of ASEAN association.

PDF

___

Asean Statistic Database, ASEAN org., (Son Görünme 17.09.2018)
Asean Statistic Database, ASEAN org., 17.09.2018
Ball, W. Macmahon. A Political Re-Examination of Seato, International Organization, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Winter, 1958), pp. 17-25.
Croissant, Aurel & Lorenz, Philip, Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia: An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes, Springer International Publishing, Germany, 2018. S. 7
Eberhard, W., En Eski Devirlerden Zamanımıza Kadar Uzak Doğu Tarihi, TTK Yayınları, Ankara 2018.
Hall, Kenneth R., A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development 100–1500, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. USA, 2011. S.2
Hooker, Virginia Matheson, A Short History of Malaysia : Linking East and West, Allen & Unwin PUB., Australia, 2003. S. 237,
http://asean.org/?static_post=asean-conception-and-evolution-bythanat-khoman.
http://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history.
http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/4-Overview-ofASEAN-Turkey-Sectoral-Dialogue-Relations-as-of-July-2018- fn.pdf.
http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/4-Overview-ofASEAN-Turkey-Sectoral-Dialogue-Relations-as-of-July-2018- fn.pdf.
http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/4-Overview-ofASEAN-Turkey-Sectoral-Dialogue-Relations-as-of-July-2018- fn.pdf.
http://www.asean.org/uploads/archive/arf/7ARF/Prof-DmentProgramme/Doc-13.pdf.
http://www.mfa.gov.tr/guneydogu-asya-ulkeleri-birligi.tr.mfa.https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/asean-name.
https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia24-february-1976.
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2018/06/14/ why-mahathir-failed-to-proceed-with-eaec-in-1997/?fmt=1.
https://www.sabah.com.tr/dunya/2010/07/23/davutoglu_aseantac_ belgesini_imzaladi.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1420437/Protesters-set-fire-toThai-embassy.html.
Katsumata, Hiro, ASEAN’s Cooperative Security Enterprise, Norms and
Interests in the ASEAN Regional Forum, Palgrave Macmillan, London UK, 2009. Kevin Ruane Seato, Medo, And The Baghdad Pact: Anthony Eden,
British Foreign Policy And The Collective Defense Of Southeast, 2005.
Asia And The Middle East, 1952–1955, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 16:1, 169-199.
McGregor, Andrew, Southeast Asian development, Routledge Pub., Oxon, 2008.
Michaud, Jean, Historical Dictionary of the Peoples of the Southeast Asian
Massif, The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Oxford UK, 2006. S. 114.
Moller, Kay. Cambodia and Burma: The ASEAN Way Ends Here, Asian Survey, Vol. 38, No. 12 (Dec., 1998), ss. 1087-1104, s:1087.
Nairn, Ronald C., SEATO: A Critique Source: Pacific Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Spring, 1968), pp. 5-18.
Pollard, Vincent K., ASA and ASEAN, 1961-1967: Southeast Asian
Regionalism, Asian Survey, Vol. 10, No. 3 (Mar., 1970), pp. 244-255. Richard Stubbs (2014) ASEAN's leadership in East Asian regionbuilding: strength in weakness, The Pacific Review, 27:4, 523-541.
Rix, A. (1989/1990) ‘Japan’s foreign aid policy: a capacity for leadership?’ Pacific Affairs 62(4), 461-75.
Ruane, K., (2005) Seato, Medo, And The Baghdad Pact: Anthony Eden, British Foreign Policy And The Collective Defense Of Southeast
Asia And The Middle East, 1952–1955, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 16:1, 169-199.
Severino, Rodolfo C., ASEAN, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies ISEAS, Singapore, (2008)
Stubbs, R. (1991) ‘Reluctant leader, expectant followers: Japan and Southeast Asia’, International Journal 46(4): 649-67.
Sussman, Gerald (1983), Macapagal, the Sabah Claim and Maphilindo:The politics of penetration, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 13:2, 210-228.
Taylor, Alastair M., Malaysia, Indonesia - and Maphilindo, International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Spring, 1964), pp. 155-171.
Temiz, Süleyman & Islam, Arshad, (2017) Political Leadership in Turkey and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur, s.18.
Young, O. R. (1991) ‘Political leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society’, International Organization 45 (3), 281-308.