Uzman Perspektifinden Bolu Kent Ormanı’ nın Çok Fonksiyonlu Kullanım Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Kent ormanları çok fonksiyonlu kullanım özellikleri (ekolojik, estetik ve mimari, fiziksel ve iklimsel, sosyal

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bolu kent ormanı, çok fonksiyonlu kullanım, kent ormanı, uzman görüşü

A Research on the Evaluation of Multifunctional Usage Features of Bolu Urban Forest from Expert Perspective

Urban forests are the basic building blocks of the urban green infrastructure system with itsmultifunctional features (ecological, aesthetic and architectural, physical and climatic, social and economic benefits).In this article, the natural and recreational usage characteristics of Bolu Urban Forest are determined by GeographicInformation Systems (GIS). Later on, 75 specialist surveys were conducted in order to contribute to multifunctionalplanning of the Bolu Urban Forest and to measure the social, aesthetic, ecological and economic benefits of thearea. The data obtained were analyzed by correlation analysis in Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS) 17.0program. As a result, although the Bolu Urban Forest has significant potential in terms of its multifunctional usecharacteristics, the urban forest has not been able to see the expected disturbance due to the fact that most ofBolu is composed of forest areas. In addition, it has been found that the operator and maintenance work are notperformed regularly and thus are below the standards required. Bolu Urban Forest should be planned holisticallyand sustainable proposals have been introduced

Keywords:

Bolu urban forest multifunctional usage, survey, urban forest, expert opinion,

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2009. Green Infrastructure Guidance, Natural England, www.naturalengland.org.uk, (Erişim tarihi: 22 Kasım 2014).
Anonim, 2012. Tabiatın Kalbi Bolu. Bolu Belediyesi, Bolu Araştırmaları Merkezi Yayınları-12, Bolu.
Anonim, 2014. Yeşildağ Orman İşletme Şefliği Kayıtları, Yeşildağ Orman İşletme Şefliği, Bolu Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü, Bolu.
COST, 2012. Green Infrastructure Approach: Linking Environmental With Social Aspects in Studying and Managing Urban Forests. European Coopperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research.
Gentin S, 2011. Outdoor recreation and ethnicity in Europe - A review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10: 153-161.
Gezer A ve Gül A, 2009. Kent Ormancılığı (Kavramsal, Teknik Ve Kültürel Yaklaşımlar), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Yayın No:86, Isparta, 244 s.
Jay M and Schraml U, 2009. Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants - uses, perception and integrative potential. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8: 283-294.
Konijnendijk CC, 2000. Adapting forestry to urban demands – role of communication in urban forestry in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52: 89-100.
MGM, 2015. Yıllık Ortalama İklim Verileri, Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. http://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceleristatistik.aspx?m=BOLU#sfB. (Erişim tarihi: 12 Mayıs, 2015).
Ode AK and Fry LA, 2002. Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1: 15-24.
Özeren, M. (2012). Yeşil Altyapı Sistemi Kapsamında Meles Deltası ve Çevresinin Kurgulanması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı, İzmir, 125 s.
Pauleit S and Duhme F, 2000. GIS assessment of Munich’s urban forest structure for urban planning. J Arboriculture, 26(3): 133–141.
Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H, 2002. Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59: 129-145.
Tahvanainen L, Tyrvainen L, Ihalainen M, Vuorela N, Kolehmainen O, 2001. Forest Management and Public Perceptions – Visual Versus Verbal Information. Landscape and Urban Planning. 53: 53-70.
Tyrvainen L, 1999. Economic Estimates Of Urban Forests: Comparison of Economic Estimates. In The Lıving Forest: Non-Market Benefits of Forestry. Forestry Commission, The Stationery Office, London.
Tyrvainen L, Pauleit S, Seeland K, Vries S, 2005. Benefits And Uses Of Urban Forests And Trees. In Urban Forests And Trees. New York: Springer, 81-114.