Biophilic Approach to Design for Children Nihan

Biophilic Approach to Design for Children Nihan

In recent years, design approaches that offer sustainable solutions have been preferred widely. Although these sustainable design approaches provide solutions for physical context, they are not able to solve the problems on psychological side of this situation. These psychological problems have been observed both on adults and children. This research aims to examine the benefits of enabling children who spend their time in built environments to experience nature through Biophilic Design. Methodology 140 children between the ages of 3 and 5 from two different pre-school institutions participated in the study. Participation criteria were to be volunteer, a pre-school student, and accessible. The pictures drawn by the children in reply to the question ‘What is nature like?’ were analysed by using content analysis and cognitive mapping method. The data obtained from the study were analysed and the results were presented as median, mean values ± standard deviations (SD), numbers, and percentages. The compliance of the total score to normal distribution according to age and gender independent variables was examined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Non-parametric tests were used in the analysis, p

___

  • Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
  • Berg, B. L. & Howard, L. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (136-139). Eğitim Yayınevi.
  • Berg, M. & E. Medrich. (1980). Children in four neighbourhoods: the physical environment and its effect on play and play patterns. Environment and Behavior, 12(3), 320-348.
  • Berman, B. G., Jonides, J. & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19,1207-1212.
  • Browning, B., Garvin, C. & Ryan, C. (2012). The economics of biophiliawhy designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/the-economics-ofbiophilia/
  • Burns, G. W. (2005). The Science of Well-being. Oxford Scholarship Online, (pp. 405–434).
  • Burrows, R. M. & Corragio, M. A. (2011, November 30- December 2). Living walls: integration of water re-use systems. Cities Alive. [Conference presentation]. 9th Annual Green Roof and Wall Conference, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Çorakçı, R. E. (2016). İç mimarlıkta biyofilik tasarım ilkelerinin belirlenmesi (Publication No. 444471) [Doctoral dissertation, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University].
  • Day, C. (2007). Environment and children: Passive lessons from the everyday environment. Architectural Press.
  • Demircioğlu, N. & Yılmaz, H. (2005). Işık kirliliği, ortaya çıkardığı sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 117- 123.
  • Derr, V. (2001). Children’s sense of place in northern new mexico. Journal of environmental psychology, 22(1-2), 125-137.
  • Derr, V. & Lance, K. (2012) Biophilic Boulder: Children’s Environment That Foster Connection to Nature. Children, Youth and Environments, 22(2), 112-143.
  • Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Roös, P. (2017). Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. KnE Engineering, 2(2), 59.
  • Faber, T., Kuo, A. & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? state of the evidence. Cambridge University Press, 124-140.
  • Fan, M., & Y. Jin. (2013). Obesity and self-control: Food consumption, physical activity, and weight-loss intention. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 36, 125–45.
  • Fromm, E. O. (1964). The Heart of Man. Harper & Row.
  • Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1): 182-191.
  • Hand, K. L., Freeman, C., Seddon, P. J., Recio, M. R., Stein, A., & Heezik, Y.
  • van. (2017). The importance of urban gardens in supporting children’s biophilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(2), 274– 279.
  • Hare, T. A., C. F. Camerer, & A. Rangel. (2009). Self-control in decisionmaking involves modulation of the PFC valuation system. Science, 324, 646–48.
  • Hildebrand, G. (2000). The origins of architectural pleasure. University of California Press.
  • İslamoğlu, A. H. & Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
  • Joye, Y. (2012). Restorative environments in environmental psychology: an introduction. Jhon Wiley & Sons.
  • Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press.
  • Kellert, S., Heerwagen, J.H. & Mador, M.L. (2008). Biophilic design: the theory, science & practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kellert, S. R. & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
  • Kuo, F.E. & Sullivan W.C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner citydoes vegetation reduce crime? Environmental Behaviour, 33, 343-367.
  • Ostendorf, M. & Retzlaff, W. & Thompson, K. (2011, November 30- December 2). Storm water runoff from green retaining wall systems; Cities alive. [Conference presentation]. 9th Annual Green Roof and Wall Conference, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Park, S.H. & Mattson, R.H. (2008). Effects of Flowering and Foliage Plants in Hospital Rooms on Patients Recovering from Abdominal Surgery. Horttechnology, 18, 563-568
  • Park, S. J., & Lee, H. C. (2019). Spatial design of childcare facilities based on biophilic design patterns. Sustainability, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102851
  • Roös, P.B. (2016). Regenerative-adaptive design for coastal settlements: a pattern language approach to future resilience [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Deakin University.
  • Sayuti, A., Montana-Hoyos, C. A. & Bonollo, E. (2015). A study of furniture design incorporating living organisms with particular reference to biophilic and emotional design criteria. Academic Journal of Science, 04(01):75–106
  • Schroll, E., Lambrinos, J. & Righetti, T. (2011). The role of vegetation in regulating stormwater runoff from green roofs in a winter rainfall climate. Ecol Engineering, 37, 963-969
  • Sever, İ., A. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemisi sonrası normalleşme sürecinde mobil mekânların mimari tasarım ölçütleri ve bir çözüm önerisi. Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi, 5(2), 477-485, https://doi.org10.26835/my.751807.
  • Söderlund, J. & Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. Environmental Science, 2(4), 950-969, doi: 10.3934
  • Thomson, G. & Newman, P. (2021). Green infrastructure and biophilic urbanism as tools for integrating resource efficient and ecological cities. Urban Planning, 6, 75-88. DOI: 10.17645/up.v6i1.3633
  • Wells, N. M. & Evans G.W. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35, 311-330.
  • White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D. & Depledge, M. (2010). The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J. Environ. Psychol, 30, 482–493
  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  • Yamane, T. (2009). Temel örnekleme yöntemleri. Literatür Yayınları.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175.