Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) approach to the multi-objective economic statistical design of variable sampling interval T2 control charts

Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) approach to the multi-objective economic statistical design of variable sampling interval T2 control charts

T2 control charts are used to primarily monitor the mean vector of quality char- acteristics of a process. Recent studies have shown that using variable sam- pling interval (VSI) schemes results in charts with more statistical power for detecting small to moderate shifts in the process mean vector. In this study, we have presented a multiple-objective economic statistical design of VSI T2 control chart when the in-control process mean vector and process covariance matrix are unknown. Then we exert to find the Pareto-optimal designs in which the two objectives are minimized simultaneously by using the Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Through an illustrative example, the advantages of the proposed approach is shown by providing a list of viable optimal solutions and graphical representations, thereby bolding the advantage of flexibility and adaptability. 2000 AMS Classifi cation:

___

  • [1] Jackson J.E. Quality Control Methods for Several Related Variables.. Technometrics. 1959;1:359-377.
  • [2] Jackson J.E. Multivariate Quality Control. Communications in Statistics.Theory and Methods. 1985; 14: 2657-2688.
  • [3] Alt, F.B., Multivariate Quality Control, the Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, New York, John Wiley, 1985.
  • [4] Mason, R.L., Tracy, N.D., and Young, J.C., A Practical Approach for Interpreting Multivariate T2 Control Chart Signals, Journal of Quality Technology. 29, 396-406, 1997.
  • [5] Lowry, C.A., Montgomery, D.C., A review of multivariate control charts, IIE Trans, 27, 800-810, 1995.
  • [6] Mason, R.L, Young, J.C., Multivariate statistical process control with industrial applications, Philadelphia, PA, ASASIAM, 2002.
  • [7] Fuchs, C., Kenett R.S, Multivariate quality control, theory and applications, NewYork, N.Y. Marcel Dekker; 1998.
  • [8] Hotelling H., Multivariate quality control - illustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights, In: Eisenhart C, Hastay MW,WallisWA, editors. Techniques of statistical analysis. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 1947. p. 111-184.
  • [9] Duncan AJ., The economic design of ¯ X charts used to maintain current control of a process, J Amer Stat Assoc. 1956; 51:228-242.
  • [10] Woodall WH., Weaknesses of the economical design of control charts, Technometrics. 1986; 28: 408-409.
  • [11] Saniga EM., Economic statistical control chart designs with an application to .X and R charts, Technometrics. 1989;31:313-320.
  • [12] Montgomery DC,Woodall WH., A discussion on statistically based process monitoring and control, J Qual Technol. 1997;29:121-162.
  • [13] Taylor HM., Markovian sequential replacement processes, Ann. Math. Stat. 1965; 36: 13-21.
  • [14] Chen YK., Economic design of variable sampling interval T2 control charts-a hybrid Markov chain approach with genetic algorithms, Expert Syst Appl. 2007;33:683-689.
  • [15] Chao YC., Chun HC., Chung, HC., Economic design of variable sampling intervals T2 control charts using genetic algorithms, Expert Syst. Appl. 2006; 30:233-242.
  • [16] Burr IW., Control charts for measurements with varying sample sizes, J. Qual. Technol. 1996: 1: 163-167.
  • [17] Daudin JJ., Double sampling charts, J. Qual. Technol. 1992: 24: 78-87.
  • [18] Prabhu SS., Runger GC., Keats JB., ¯ X Chart with adaptive sample sizes, Int. J. Prod. Res. 1993; 31: 2895-2909.
  • [19] Chen YK., Economic design of variable T2 control chart with the VSSI sampling scheme, Qual. Quant. 2009.
  • [20] Torabian M., Moghadam MB., Faraz A., economically designed Hotelling,sT2 control chart using VSICL scheme, The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2010; 35: 251-263.
  • [21] Seif A., Moghadam MB., Faraz A., Heuchenne C., Statistical Merits and Economic Evaluation of T2 Control Charts with the VSSC Scheme, Arab J Sci Eng. 2011; 36:1461-1470.
  • [22] Seif A., Faraz A., Heuchenne C., Saniga E., Moghadam MB., A modified economic statistical design of T2 control chart with variable sample sizes and control limits, J. Appl. Stat. 2011; 38: 2459-2469.
  • [23] Costa AFB., Rahim MA., Economic design of ¯ X charts with variable parameters: the Markov Chain approach, J. Appl. Stat. 2001; 28: 875-885.
  • [24] Faraz A., Saniga E., Multiobjective genetic algorithm approach to the economic statistical design of control charts with an application to ¯ X and S2 charts, Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013; 29:407-415. doi:10.1002/qre.1390.
  • [25] Ehrgott M., Gandibleux X., Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003.
  • [26] Carlyle WM., Fowler JW., Gel ES., Kim B., Quantitative comparison of approximate solution sets for bi-criteria optimization problems, Decis Sci J. 2003:34:63-82.
  • [27] Deb K., Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary, Algorithms Chichester. John Wiley, UK. 2001.
  • [28] Fonseca CM., Fleming PJ., Genetic algorithms for multi-objective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization, In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms San Mateo, California. 1993.
  • [29] Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., and Meyarivan T., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation. 2002; 6:184-197.
  • [30] Cinlar E., Introduction to Stochastic Process, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 1975.
  • [31] Schaffer JD., Multiple Objective Optimization With Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithms, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Genetic Algorithm and Their Applications, 1985.
  • [32] Horn J., and Nafpliotis N., Multiobjective optimization using the niched genetic algorithm, Technical Report IIIiGAI Report 93005, University of Illinoisat Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA, 1993.
  • [33] Zitzler E., and Thiele L., Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms-A comparative case study, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN V, A. E. Eiben, et al. (eds.), Berlin Sprinter. 1998.