___

• Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 39, 1261–1264, 1993.
• Anderson, T. R., Hollingsworth, K. and Inman, L. The fixed weighting nature of a cross- evaluation model, Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 249–255, 2002.
• Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G. and Thanassoulis, E. Applied data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 52, 1–15, 1991.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444, 1978.
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, second ed., (Springer Science & Business Publishers, New York, 2007).
• Despotis, D. K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units, Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, 314–323, 2002.
• Doyle, J. and Green, R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA; Derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of The Operational Research Society 45, 567–578, 1994.
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jafari, Y. and Maddahi, R. Selecting symmet- ric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation, Applied Mathematical Modelling 35, 544–549, 2011.
• Lam, K. F. In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA, Journal of the Operational Research Society 61, 134–143, 2010.
• Liang, L., Wu, J. , Cook, W. and Zhu, J. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross efficiency evaluation, Int. J. Production Economics 113, 1025–1030, 2008.
• Ram´on, N., Ruiz, J. L. and Sirvent, I. A multiplier bound approach to assess relative ef- ficiency in DEA without slacks, European Journal of Operational Research 203, 261–269, 2010.
• Ram´on, N., Ruiz, J. L. and Sirvent, I. On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations, European Journal of Operational Research 207, 1564–1572, 2010.
• Roll, Y. and Golany, B. Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA, Omega 21, 99–109, 1993.
• Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H. and Hogan, A. J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and ex- tensions, in R. H Silkman (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 32, 73–105, 1986.
• Sherman, H. D. Data envelopment analysis as a new managerial audit methodology- test and evaluation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 4, 35–53, 1984.
• Thanassoulis, E. A comparison of regression analysis and data envelopment analysis as al- ternative methods for performance assessments, Journal of the Operational Research Society 44, 1129–1144, 1993.
• Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Thrall, R. M. and Smith, B. A. Comparative site evalu- ations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16, 35–49, 1986.
• Wang, Y. M. and Chin, K. S. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension, Expert Systems with Applications 37, 3666–3675, 2010.
• Wu, J., Liang, L. and Yang, F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 872–876, 2009.
• Wu, J., Liang, L. and Yang, F. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of ranking priority in cross-evaluation, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4826–4829, 2009. [21] Wu, J., Liang, L. and Zha, Y. Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross effi- ciency model, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 52, 105–111, 2009.
• Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L. and Zha, Y. Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 5162–5165, 2011.