Comparison of the “Twenty-four hour pH Monitoring Test” results of the pregnant and non-pregnant reflux patients

AMAÇ: 24 saat pH monitorizasyon testi gastroözofajiyal reflü tanısı için önemli ve yararlı bir araçtır. Bu çalışmada gebe olan ve olmayan gastroözofajiyal reflü hastalarında test sonuçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: 10 gebe ve 10 gebe olmayan control hastasına 24 saat pH monitorizasyon testi uygulandı. Gebe olan 10 reflü hastasının 3’ü üçüncü trimesterda ve 7’si ikinci tri mesterda idi. Bütün hastalar klinik olarak gastroözofajiyal reflü hastalığı tanısı almıştı. Hastalar reflü semptomları ile ilgili de taylı anket doldurdu. BULGULAR: Her iki grupta birer hasta hariç bu test ile reflü hastalığı doğrulandı. Her iki grupta da yüksek helikobakterse ropozitifliği vardı. Demeester skorlaması ile gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. SONUÇ: Sadece proksimal ölçümlerden en uzun reflü zamanı parametresinde anlamlı farklılık saptansa da, bütün ölçümler de gebe hastaların sonuçları daha fazla hastalık lehine idi. Daha büyük çalışma gruplarında daha anlamlı sonuçlar elde edilebilir.

Gebe olan ve olmayan reflü hastalarının “24 saat pH monitorizasyon testi” ile karşılaştırılması

Objective: Twenty-four hour pH monitoring test is an important and helpful tool in diagnosis of the gastro-esophageal reflux disease. In this study we aimed to compare test results of pregnant and nonpregnant patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Study Design: Twenty-four hour pH monitoring test performed in 10 pregnant and 10 non-pregnant control patients. Among 10 pregnant gastroesophageal reflux patients; 3 were in third trimester and 7 were in second trimester. All patients had clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and have filled a detailed questionnaire about reflux symptoms. Results: Except one patient in each group whole patients had reflux diagnosis confirmed. There was high seropositivity for helicobacter in both groups. We observed no significant difference in demeester scores of the groups. Conclusions: Although only significance detected in the longest reflux time in proximal test results, other proximal test results of the pregnant group were markedly worse also. In the larger study groups this difference can be elucidated more meaningfully.

Kaynakça

1. Rayburn W, Liles E, Christensen H, Robinson M: Antacids vs. antacids plus non-prescription ranitidine for heartburn during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 66:35-7.

2. Marchand P: The gastro-oesophageal sphincter and the mechanism of regurgitation. Br J Surg 1955;42:504-13.

3. de Castro LP: Reflux esophagitis as the cause of heartburn in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967;98:1-10.

4. Marrero JM, Goggin PM, de Caestecker JS, Pearce JM, Maxwell JD: Determinants of pregnancy heartburn. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99:731-4.

5. Bainbridge E, Temple J, Nicholas S: Symptomatic gas troesophageal reflux in pregnancy: a comparative study of white Europeans and Asians in Birmingham. Br J Clin Practice 1983;37:53-7.

6. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA: Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 1990;335:205-8.

7. Lind JF, Smith AM, McIver DK, Coopland AT, Crispin JS: Heartburn in pregnancy--a manometric study. Can Med Assoc J 1968; 98:571-4.

8. Van Thiel DH, Gavaler JS, Joshi SN, Sara RK, Stremple J: Heartburn of pregnancy. Gastroenterology 1977;72: 666-8.

9. Spence AA, Moir DD, Finlay WE: Observations on intra gastric pressure. Anaesthesia 1967; 22(2):249-56.

10. Al-Amri SM: Twenty-four hour pH monitoring during pregnancy and at postpartum: a preliminary study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;102:127-30.

11. Vemulapalli R: Diet and lifestyle modifications in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nutr Clin Pract 2008;23:293-8.

12. Anton C, Anton E, Drug V, Stanciu C: [Gastroesophageal reflux during pregnancy: 24-hour esophageal ph monitor ing]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2001;105:740-5.

13. Us D, Hascelik G: Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in an Asymptomatic Turkish population. J Infect 1998;37:148-50.

14. Raghunath A, Hungin AP, Wooff D, Childs S: Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:737.

15. Wu JC, Sung JJ, Ng EK, Go MY, Chan WB, Chan FK, Leung WK, Choi CL, Chung SC: Prevalence and distribu tion of Helicobacter pylori in gastroesophageal reflux dis ease: a study from the East. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:1790-4.

Kaynak Göster

  • ISSN: 1300-4751
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995

6.1b 2.6b

Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Plasma calprotectin levels in preeclamptic, normotensive pregnant and nonpregnant women

Sedat AKÇUM, Ebru ZÜLFİKAROĞLU, Süleyman ESERDAĞ, Utku ÖZCAN

Empty follicle or bot? A case report

Eray ÇALIŞKAN, Ender YALÇINKAYA

Correlation between the number of removed lymph nodes and ratio of lymph node metastasis in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer

Taner TURAN, H. Levent KESKİN, Tüyan İLHAN, Gökhan TULUNAY, Nurettin BORAN, Süha ÖZER, Ö. Faruk DEMİR, M. Faruk KÖSE

Retrospective analysis of placental invasion anomalies in a university hospital

Devran BILDIRCIN, Miğraci TOSUN, Erdal MALATYALIOĞLU, Eren Ensari YAZICI, Mehmet KEFELİ, Mehmet ÇETİNKAYA, MEHMET SAKINCI, Handan ÇELİK

Maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenic purpura

A. İrfan GÜZEL, Umur KUYUMCUOĞLU, Mahmut ERDEMOĞLU

The comparison of depression, anxiety and quality of life levels among trimesters of pregnancy

Savaş KARATAYLI, Kazım GEZGİNÇ, Faruk UĞUZ, Rengin KARATAYLI, ALİ SAVAŞ ÇİLLİ

Educational status, number of previous contraceptive failure do not effect the women’s contraceptive preference after surgical abortion in Turkey

ENİS ÖZKAYA, Vakkas KORKMAZ, Osman Fadıl KARA, Tuncay KÜÇÜKÖZKAN

Successful vaginal delivery in spite of a large pelvic neurofibroma

Hüseyin Levent KESKİN, Olcay TURGUT, Karabekir ERCAN, Gökalp KABACAOĞLU, Işık ÜSTÜNER, Ayşe Filiz AVŞAR

Prenatal diagnosis of catch22 syndrome

Rana KARAYALÇIN, Serdar CEYLANER, FERİDE İFFET ŞAHİN, ŞEBNEM ÖZYER, MELİKE DOĞANAY, Nuri DANIŞMAN

The association of bacterial vaginosis with gynecologic complaints and clinical data

Gözde IŞIK, Ayşegül KÜÇÜK, Sayeste DEMİREZEN, Mehmet Sinan BEKSAÇ, Gülşen HASÇELİK