Mürsel ERDAL, İbrahim ÖZYÜREK

Assessment of Qualification Criteria Described in Public Procurement Law Code 4734 in Construction Works by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Turkish public procurement law and secondary regulations describe tender evaluation in detail.In this system, bidders’ capabilities on each qualification criteria are evaluated either as satisfiedor not satisfied therefore final evaluation is solely price based. This method is criticized asincomplete and lacking consideration in terms of the contractor’s ability to achievesimultaneously, time, cost, quality and safety standards. In this study, each qualification criteriais given a weight to be determined by group of experts in tender evaluation making tenderevaluation a multi criteria decision making problem. Group AHP method is used to identify theweights of qualification criteria already in use.

PDF

___

Nieto-Morote A., Ruz-Vila. F., “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification”, Automation in Construction, 25: 8-19, (2012).
Burdurlu, E., Ejder, E., “Location choice for furniture industry firms by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 16(2): 369-373, (2003).
Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S., “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1): 1-29, (2006).
Arpacioglu, U., Ersoy, H.Y., “Daylight and energy oriented architecture design support model”, Gazi University Journal of Science, 26(2): 331-346, (2013).
Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., Sonmez. R., “Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects”, Journal of Safety Research, 46: 99-105, (2013).
Uğur, L.O., Baykan, U., “A model proposal for wall material selection decisions by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)”, Acta Physica Polonica A, 132(3): 577-579, (2017).
Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., “An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system”, Omega, 29(2): 171-182, (2011).
El-Sawalhi, N., Eaton, D., Rustom, R., “Establishing relative weights for contractor prequalification criteria in a pre-qualification evaluation model”, The 7th International Postgraduate Research Conference, Manchester, 43-53, (2007).
Cheung, S.O., Lam, P.T.I., Leung, M.Y., Wan, Y.W., “An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method”, Construction Management and Economics, 19(4): 427-437, (2001).
Jaskowski, P., Biruk, S., Bucon, R., “Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment”, Automation in Construction, 19(2): 120- 126, (2010).
Supciller, A.A., Capraz, O., “AHP-TOPSIS yöntemine dayalı tedarikçi seçimi uygulaması”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve Istatistik Dergisi, 13: 1-22, (2011).
Trivedi, M.K., Pandey, M.K., Bhadoria, S.S., “Prequalification of construction contractor using a FAHP”, International Journal of Computer Applications, 28(10): 39-45, (2011).
Kolekar, P.B., Kanade, G.N., “Contractor selection in construction industry using fuzzy-logic system”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3(11): 1087-1093, (2014).
Liu, B., Huo, T., Liao, P.C., Gong, J., Xue, B., “A group decision-making aggregation model for contractor selection in large scale construction projects based on two-stage partial least squares (PLS) path modelling”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(5): 855-883, (2015).
Mimović, P., Stanković, J., Milić, V.J., “Decision-making under uncertainty-the integrated approach of the AHP and bayesian analysis”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1): 868-878, (2015).
Bragg, S.M., Business Ratios and Formulas A Comprehensive Guide, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New Jersey, (2002).
Internet: in My Accounting Course, https://www.myaccountingcourse.com/financial-ratios/equityratio, (Accessed 11.12.2017).
Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation, Public Procurement Law Code 4734, (2002).
Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill International, New York, (1980).
Saaty, T.L., “Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science, 32(7): 841-855, (1986).
Saaty, T.L., “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83-98, (2008).
Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S.H., “Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges”, Inter’l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1): 35-44, (1995).
Garcia Márquez, F.P., Lev, B., Advanced Business Analytics, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, (2015).
Saaty, T.L., “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 9-26, (1990).
Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, Mcgraw-Hill International, New York, (1980).
Saaty, T.L., “Decision making-the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP)”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1): 1-35, (2004).
Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer Science + Business Media, New York, (2012).