YAPILANDIRMACI EĞİTİM VE ÖĞRETİM YAKLAŞIMLARI

Yapılandırmacılık, epistemolojik bir yaklaşımdır. Bununla beraber eğitim programlarına etki etmekte ve sı-nıfta eğitim-öğretim uygulamalarını yönlendirmektedir. Yapılandırmacılık eğitim alanında yeni ortaya çıkan bir kavram olmakla beraber köken itibariyle çok eskilere dayanmaktadır. Temel yaklaşımı ise bilginin ne olduğu ve bilenin bunu nasıl bildiği ile ilgilidir. Bilginin ne olduğu ve bunu insanın nasıl bildiğine ilişkin açıklamaları dolaylı olarak bunun nasıl öğretileceğine ilişkin de belli bazı ilkeler sunmaktadır. Bu ilkelere dayanan farklı öğretim uygulamaları önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yapılandırmacılık, Yapılandırmacı Eğitim

PDF

___

1. Airasian, P. W. & Walsh, M. E. (1997) “Cons-tructivist Cautions (Theory of Constructivism).” Phi Delta Kapan, 78(6), 444-449. ERIC No: EJ 539 113.
2. Applefield, J. M., Huber, R. L. & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a Better Undestanding. High School Journal, 84(2), 35-53.
3. Ataizi, M. (2001). Durumlu Öğrenme. (Editör: A. Şimşek), Sınıfta Demokrasi. Ankara: Eği-tim Sen Yay. 146-170.
4. Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Reviewing the Rese-arch on Hypermedia-Based Learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 500-525.
5. Becker, D&Dwyer, M. (1994). Using Hyperme-dia to Provide Learner Control. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(2), 155-172.
6. Brown, J. S.; Collins, A.&Duguid P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
7. Cash, J. R., Behrmann, M. B., Stadt, R. W.&Mc Daniels, H. (1997). Effectiveness of Cognitive Apprenticeship Instructional Methods in Colle-ge Automotive Technology Classrooms. Jour-nal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(2), 29-49.
8. Chen, W.&Rovegno, I. (2000). Examination of Expert and Novice Teachers’ Constructivist-Oriented Teaching Practices Using a Move-ment Approach to Elementary Physical Edu-cation. Elementary Physical Education,7(4), 357-3-368.
9. Cobb, P (1994). Where is the Mind? Cons-tructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development. Educational Re-searcher, (23), 713-20.
10. TGV (1993). Anchored Instruction and Situated Cognition Rewisted. Educational Technology, 33(3), 52-70.
11. CTGV (1991). Technology and the Design of Generative Learning Environments. Educatio-nal Technology, May, 34-40.
12. Entwisle N. J.& Ramsden, P.(1983). Unders-tanding Student Learning Learning. London: Crook Helm.
13. Gagne, E., Yekovich C. W.&Yekovich, F. (1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School-ing Learning. New York: Harper Collins.
14. Garrison, J. (1998). Toward a Pragmatic Social Constructivism. (Ed. M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz &J. Garrison). Constructivism and Education. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Universty Press. 43-60.
15. Jarviven, E-M (1999). The Lego Learning En-vironment in Technology Education: An Experiment in a Finnish Context. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(4), 76-85.
16. Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Cognitive Flexibilty Theory and its Implications For Desining CBI (Eds. S. Dijkstra, H. P. Krammer,&J. J. van Merrienboer), Instructional Models in Computer Based Learning Environments. Heidelberg, FRG: Springer-Verlag. 385-404.
17. Jonassen, D. H., Dyer, D., Peters, K., Robinson, T., Harvey, D., King, M. & Loughner, P. (1997). Cognitive Flexibility Hypertexts on the Web: Engaging Learners in Meaning Making. (Ed. B. Khan ), Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. 119-134.
18. McLellan, H. (1996) Being digital; Implications for Education. Educational Technology, No-vember/December, 5-20.
19. Piaget, J. (1976). The Child and Reality: Problems of Genetic Psychology. (Translated by Arnold Rasin), Middlesex, England, Penguin Books.
20. Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Pers-pective. American Journal of Education, 100, 354-395.
21. Riordan-Karlsson, M. (2000). Constructivism. Westminster: Teacher Created Materials, Inc.
22. Samaras, A. & Gismondi S. (1998). Scaffolds in the Field: Vygotskian Interpretation in a Teacher Education Program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(7), 715-733.
23. Savery, J. R. & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and its Constructivist Framework. Educational Tech-nology, 35 (1), 31-38.
24. Solomon, J. (2000). The Changing Perspectives of Constructivism: Sicience Wars and Children’ s Creativity. (Ed. D. C. Phillips), Construc-tivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. 283-307.
25. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J. & Coulson, R. L. (1995). Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisiti-on in Ill-Structured Domains. (Eds. L. P. Steffe & J. Gale), Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 85-107.
26. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Construc-tivist Position. (Ed. F. Steier). Research and Reflexivity. London: Sage Pub. 553-571.
27. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1998). Düşünce ve Dil. (Çe-viren; S. Koray). İstanbul: Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayınları. (1. baskı, 1985), Kaynak Yayınları.
28. Applefield, J. M., Huber, R. L. & Moallem, M. (2000). Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a Better Undestanding. High School Journal, 84(2), 35-53.
29. Cash, J. R., Behrmann, M. B., Stadt, R. W.& McDaniels, H. (1997). Effectiveness of Cogni-tive Apprenticeship Instructional Methods in College Automotive Technology Classrooms. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(2), 29-49.