COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES

Öz The Phase Division Multiplexing (PDM) technique developed for more efficient use of communication resources has recently gain popularity in wireless communication systems. The PDM technique contributes to parallel communication with the multi-channel structure it supports. Unlike the FDM and TDM techniques, which are frequently used in wireless communication, the PDM has two and four channel structures and multiplexes the phase of the signal. It is thought that the performance analyses of the proposed 2 and 4-channel structures will give the researchers an idea of which aspects are superior and where they can be used. In this study, phase division multiplexing structures are analysed and comparative performance analysis are performed and the results are shared.When PDM structures are analysed, it is seen that 2-channel PDM-BPSK, 2-channel PDM-QPSK and 4-channel PDM-BPSK structures have been developed. In order to compare these structures with each other, graphical user interface has been designed by using MATLAB program and constellation diagrams of each structure have been obtained. Simulation studies of these three structures have been performed by using MATLAB / Simulink program. Simulations have been run with the same system parameters and Bit Error Rate (BER) curves have been obtained. Tolerance ranges have been compared over constellation diagrams and bit error rate curves obtained by simulations have been shared.As a result of the comparing performed in this study; the 2-channel PDM-BPSK structure is the simplest and least energy required structure. The 4-channel PDM-BPSK structure is advantageous with the number of channels it provides, but it needs the most energy. The 2-channel PDM-QPSK stands out with its symbol / bit rate. It also requires an energy value in the energy range of the other two techniques.

Kaynakça

White, C., Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User’s Approach. USA: Course Technology Cengage Learning, 2015.

Ryan, M. J., and Frater, M., Communications and Information Systems. Red Hill: Argos Press P/L, 2002.

Patranabis, D., Telemetry Principles. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education., 1999.

Schiller, J. H., Mobile Communications. Great Britain: Pearson Education, 2003.

Stallings, W., Data and Computer Communications eight edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc., 2007.

Çıbuk, M., “WIMAX/IEEE 802.16 Ağları Üzerinden Web Tabanlı Bio-Telemetri Uygulamaları için Protokol Tasarımı Ve Gerçekleştirilmesi,” Doktora Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ, 2009.

Li, Y. G., and Stuber, G., Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing for wireless communications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media., 2006.

Al-Tamimi, A. K., “Exponential Effective Signal to Noise Ratio Mapping (EESM) Computation for Wimax Physical Layer,” Master of Science Thesis, Sever Institute of Washington University, Washington, 2007.

Prasad, R., OFDM for Wireless Communications Systems. Boston&London: Artech House, 2004.

Kaur, S., and Bharti, G., Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing in Wireless Communication Systems : A Review, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Eng. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 125–129, 2012.

Rashmi, R., and Sarala, S. M., OFDM : Modulation Technique for Wireless Communication, Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2014.

Arrano, H. F., and Azurdia-Meza, C. A., OFDM: Today and in the Future of Next Generation Wireless Communications, in 2016 IEEE Central America and Panama Student Conference (CONESCAPAN), 2016, no. October, pp. 1–6.

Hoffmann, C., Code Division Multiplexing, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institu of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts, USA, 2004.

Jordan, R., and Abdallah, C. T., Wireless. Communications and An Overview, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 185–193, 2002.

Fan, P., Multiple Access Technologies for Next Generation Mobile Communications, in 2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications Proceedings, 2006, pp. 10–11.

Geylani, M., and Çıbuk, M., Multichannel Approach with Phase Based Multiplexing in Wireless Communication and Its Feasibility, in International Conference on Multidisciplinary, Science, Engineering and Technology (IMESET’17 Bitlis), 2017, p. 267.

Geylani, M., and Çıbuk, M., Phase Division Multiplexing with 4-level PSK Modulation and Simulation, in IDAP 2018 : International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing’18, 2018.

Geylani, M., Kablosuz Algılayıcı Ağlarda Melez Çoğullama Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Zaman Bağımsız Yeni Bir İletim Tekniğinin Geliştirilmesi, Thesis, Bitlis Eren University, 2018.

Tomasi, W., and Atakay, M., Elektronik İletişim Teknikleri, Ankara: MEB, 2002.

Sharma, D. K., et al., Analog & Digital Modulation Techniques: An Overview, Tech. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 551–561, 2010.

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ejt498084, journal = {European Journal of Technique (EJT)}, issn = {2536-5010}, eissn = {2536-5134}, address = {INESEG Yayıncılık Dicle Üniversitesi Teknokent, Sur/Diyarbakır}, publisher = {Hibetullah KILIÇ}, year = {2018}, volume = {8}, pages = {151 - 159}, doi = {10.36222/ejt.498084}, title = {COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES}, key = {cite}, author = {Çıbuk, Musa and Geylani, Munip} }
APA Çıbuk, M , Geylani, M . (2018). COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES . European Journal of Technique (EJT) , 8 (2) , 151-159 . DOI: 10.36222/ejt.498084
MLA Çıbuk, M , Geylani, M . "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES" . European Journal of Technique (EJT) 8 (2018 ): 151-159 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejt/issue/41882/498084>
Chicago Çıbuk, M , Geylani, M . "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES". European Journal of Technique (EJT) 8 (2018 ): 151-159
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES AU - Musa Çıbuk , Munip Geylani Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - doi: 10.36222/ejt.498084 DO - 10.36222/ejt.498084 T2 - European Journal of Technique (EJT) JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 151 EP - 159 VL - 8 IS - 2 SN - 2536-5010-2536-5134 M3 - doi: 10.36222/ejt.498084 UR - https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.498084 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 European Journal of Technique COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES %A Musa Çıbuk , Munip Geylani %T COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES %D 2018 %J European Journal of Technique (EJT) %P 2536-5010-2536-5134 %V 8 %N 2 %R doi: 10.36222/ejt.498084 %U 10.36222/ejt.498084
ISNAD Çıbuk, Musa , Geylani, Munip . "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES". European Journal of Technique (EJT) 8 / 2 (Aralık 2018): 151-159 . https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.498084
AMA Çıbuk M , Geylani M . COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES. EJT. 2018; 8(2): 151-159.
Vancouver Çıbuk M , Geylani M . COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES. European Journal of Technique (EJT). 2018; 8(2): 151-159.
IEEE M. Çıbuk ve M. Geylani , "COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PHASE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES", European Journal of Technique (EJT), c. 8, sayı. 2, ss. 151-159, Ara. 2018, doi:10.36222/ejt.498084