ANALYSIS OF THE HEAT PUMP PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT REFRIGERANTS IN A BUILDING WITH DETERMINED HEATING LOAD ACCORDING TO TS 825

In this study, the performance of a geothermal heat pump used in heating mode for a house whose heating energy need is determined according to the Turkish thermal insulation standard TS 825, with different refrigerants has been theoretically analyzed. Accordingly, the annual heating energy need was calculated by taking the building components of the house into consideration, and it was determined that the heat pump condenser to meet this need should have a capacity of 15 kW. In addition, 7 different refrigerants with zero ozone depletion potential (ODP) in the heat pump system were annalized at variable evaporator temperatures and the performance of the geothermal heat pump was investigated. In the study, thermodynamic analysis was applied to the system by using Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HFC) refrigerant types R 134a, R 143a, R 404A, R 407A, R 407C, R 410A and R 507A refrigerants for the determined operating conditions of the geothermal heat pump. Solway Solkane 8.0 calculation program was used for analysis. As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that the lowest operating loads and the highest heating effect coefficient values for the same operating conditions will be obtained from the system using R 134a, R407A, R 407C refrigerants, respectively. Moreover it was determined that the refrigerant with the highest pressure ratio value was R 134a.

PDF

___

[1] Söğüt, M. Z., Bulgurcu, H., Yalçın, E. (2012). Emission Inventory Depending on Refrigerants in the Refrigeration Industry, 1st National Air Conditioning Refrigeration Education Symposium.
[2] Unal, F. (2019). Condensation Analysis of The Insulation of Walls in Mardin Province According to Different Locations, European Journal of Technique, 9(2), 253-62.
[3] Yılmaz, F., Selbaş, R., Özgür, A., E., Balta, M., T. (2016 ). SOLKATERM@SES36 Performance Analysis of Refrigerant in Refrigeration Applications, SDU International Journal of Technological Science, 8(1), 10-19.
[4] Camdali, U., Bulut, M., Sozbir, N. (2015). Numerical modeling of a ground source heat pump: The Bolu case, Renewable Energy, 83, 352-361.
[5] D’Accadia M. D., Vanoli L. (2004). Thermoeconomic optimisation of the condenser in a vapour compression heat pump, International Journal of Refrigeration, 27(4), 433–441.
[6] Boran, K., Menlik, T., Alpsoy, H. (2015). Experimental Investigation of Performance of R134a/R152a Refrigerant Mixture in Heat Pump, Journal of Polytechnic, 18 (4), 251-256.
[7] Xu, X., Hwang, Y., Radermacher, R. (2013). Performance comparison of R410A and R32 in vapor injection cycles, International Journal of Refrigeration, 36(3), 892–903.
[8] Alkan, R., Kabul, A., Kızılkan, Ö. (2014). Thermodynamıc Analysıs Of A Ground Source Heat Pump For Dıfferent Refrıgerants, Journal of Thermal Science and Technology, 34(1), 27-34.
[9] Çomaklı, K., Çomaklı, Ö., Yılmaz, M., Özyurt, Ö., Erdoğan, S., Şahin, B., Bakırcı, K. (2007). Investigation of Energy and Exergy Efficiencies in Heat Pumps Using Zeotropic Gas Mixtures, TUBITAK Research Project Final Report, Project No: 105M030, pp.161, Erzurum.
[10] Yang, M.H., Yeh, R.H. (2015). Performance and exergy destruction analyses of optimal subcooling for vapor compression refrigeration systems, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 87, 1-10.
[11] TS 825. (1998). Thermal Insulation Rules in Buildings. Turkish Standardization Institute, Ankara.
[12] www.solway.com, accessed: 15.04.2020.
[13] www.solkane.com, accessed: 15.04.2020.

ISSN: 2536-5010
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
Yayıncı: INESEG Yayıncılık A.Ş.

Arşiv