Evaluation of Calcium Hydroxide Removal Efficiency of Different Concentrations and Forms of Sodium Hypochlorite
Evaluation of Calcium Hydroxide Removal Efficiency of Different Concentrations and Forms of Sodium Hypochlorite
The aim of the present study was to compare different forms of sodium hypochlorite for the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals. Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared using ProTaper Next file up to size X3. Each root canal was filled with calcium hydroxide using #30 Lentulo (Dentsply, Mailifer, Switzerland) to the working length and stored in 100% humidity at 37 C for 7 days. Afterwards, the teeth were divided into 4 groups according to the irrigation protocol to be used for the removal of calcium hydroxide (n=10): Group 1, 2.5% NaOCI; Group 2, 5.25% NaOCI; Group 3, NaOCI gel; Group 4, Distilled water (control). Samples were split longitudinally, photos of halves were taken at 10× magnification and were analyzed using the Corel DRAW Graphics Suite X4 v14.0 (Corel Corporation. CA, USA) software to calculate the percentage of surfaces with residual calcium hydroxide. Chi-square test was used for making comparisons among the groups at a significance level of p
___
- 1. Möller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlén G, Sundqvist G, Happonen RP. Apical periodontitis development and bacterial response to endodontic treatment. Experimental root canal infections in monkeys with selected bacterial strains. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 207-15.
- 2. de Oliveira RL, Guerisoli DMZ, Duque JA, et al. Computed microtomography evaluation of calcium hydroxide-based root canal dressing removal from oval root canals by different methods of irrigation. Microsc Res Tech 2019; 82: 232-237.
- 3. Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Burklein S, Schafer E. Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from Artificial Grooves in Straight Root Canals: Sonic Activation Using EDDY Versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and XPendo Finisher. J Endod 2019; 45(3): 322-326.
- 4. Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study. J Endod 2006; 32: 1097-101.
- 5. Zorzin J, Wießner J, Wießner T, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Ebert J. Removal of Radioactively Marked Calcium Hydroxide from the Root Canal: Influence of Volume of Irrigation and Activation. J Endod 2016; 42(4): 637-640.
- 6. Ok E, Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Capar ID. Effectiveness of different irrigation protocols on calcium hydroxide removal from simulated immature teeth after apexification. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2015; 1: 1-5.
- 7. Wang Y, Guo LY, Fang HZ, et al. An in vitro study on the efficacy of removing calcium hydroxide from curved root canal systems in root canal therapy. Int J Oral Sci 2017; 9: 110- 116.
- 8. Lambrianidis T, Kosti E, Boutsioukis C, Mazinis M. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 55- 61.
- 9. Faria G, Viola KS, Coaguila-Llerena H, et al. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into root canal dentine: effect of surfactants, gel form and passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 385-392.
- 10. Pontes F, Pontes H, Adachi P, Rodini C, Almeida D, Pinto D, Jr. Gingival and bone necrosis caused by accidental sodium hypochlorite injection instead of anaesthetic solution. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 267-270.
- 11. Zand V, Lotfi M, Rahimi S, Mokhtari H, Kazemi A, Sakhamanesh V. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. J Endod 2010; 36: 1234-1237.
- 12. Garcia AJ, Kuga MC, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Effect of sodium hypochlorite under several formulations on root canal dentin microhardness. J Investig Clin Dent 2013; 4: 229-232.
- 13. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1999; 25: 431-433.
- 14. Bodrumlu E, Avsar A, Hazar Bodrumlu E, Cicek E. The effects of calcium hydroxide removal methods on bond strength of Epiphany SE with two irrigation protocols. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 989-993.
- 15. Faria G, Viola KS, Coaguila-Llerena H, et al. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into root canal dentine: effect of surfactants, gel form and passive ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 385-392.
- 16. Goldsmith M, Gulabivala K, Knowles JC. The effect of sodium hypochlorite irrigant concentration on tooth surface strain. J Endod 2002; 28(8): 575-579.
- 17. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Sener B, Waltimo T. Tissue-dissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 756- 762.
- 18. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod 1992; 18: 605-612.
- 19. Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi M, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms. Int Endod J 1999; 32: 99- 102.
- 20. Siqueira JF, Jr., Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2000; 26: 331-334.
- 21. Türkün M, Gökay N, Özdemir N. Comparative investigation of the toxic and necrotic tissue-dissolving effects of different endodontic irrigants. İ Ü Diş Hek Fak Der. 1998; 32: 87-94. (in Turkish)
- 22. Gokturk H, Ozkocak I, Buyukgebiz F, Demir O. Effectiveness of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves. J Appl Oral Sci 2017; 25: 290-298.
- 23. Rödig T, Hirschleb M, Zapf A, Hülsmann M. Comparison of ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo for the removal of calcium hydroxide and Ledermix paste from root canals. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 1155-1161.
- 24. Gu L-s, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35: 791-804.