Resul NUSRETOĞLU, Hakan SARSILMAZ, Yunus DÖNER

A New Technique For Prevention of Postoperative Complications After Gastropancreaticoduodenal Resections

Pancreaticoduodenal resection- is the only radical method of treating the tumour of the biliopancreaticoduodenal zones and chronic pseudotumour lesions of the head of the pancreas. The aim of our work is to increase good results of the gastropancreaticoduodenal resections. From 1984-2006 in the Syzganov A.N. National scientific center of surgery, 138 pancreaticoduodenal resections were carried out due to tumors of the pancreaticoduodenal zones and chronic bulbous pseudotumourous pancrearitis. For finding out the specific complication of the gastropancreaticoduodenal resection, 103 patient’s medical records of the control group were analyzed. Based on our experiences, we have the following indications before carrying out our methods of pancreatodigestive anastomosis.Our method of the gastropancreaticoduodenal resection has reduced the post-surgical complications: acute pancreatitis of the pancreatic stump –from 49 incidence (47,5%) to only one (2,8%), pancreonecrosis -16 (15,5%) to 0, indehiscence of the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis –from 25 (24,2%) to 2 (5,7%), indehiscence of the hepaticojejunal anastomosis – from 14 (13,6%) to 1 (2,8%), indehiscence of the gastrointestinal anastomosis – from 2 (1,9%) to 0. Gastrointestinal bleeding –from 6 (5,8%) to 1 (2,8%), intestinal fistulas – from 2 (1,9%) to 0, pancreatic fistulas – from 4 (3,9%) to 0, gastro stasis from 10 (9,7%) to 0. In the control group, the most common reason of the mortality was peritonitis in (49,9%) due to indehiscence and necrosis of the pancreas and development of retroperitoneal phlegmons and abscess, and also erosive bleeding (43,8%). In the main group within the last three years among the 35 operated patients with our methods, there was a mortality in one case (2,8%). After all, we can conclude that, the newly developed method of invaginating pancreaticojejunal anastomosis “end to end” with adequate drainage of the anastomosis zone through microjejunostomy provides decompression of the zone of the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis through microjejunostomy, hence reduced the indehiscence of the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.

PDF

___

Kubyshkin V.A., Vishnevsky V.A. Rak podzheludochnoj zhelezy. 2003 P.-30, P.-232- .241.P.318.P.322, P.304. P.305-306.P. 308-309 (in Russian)
Demin D.I., Kralish V.V., Minaev I.I. Propp A.R., Karpenko A.D. Problemy radikal'nogo hirurgicheskogo lecheniya bol'nyh pankreatoduodenal'nym rakom. Rossijskij onkologicheskij zhurnal 1997; 2: 18-20. (in Russian)
Karmilov V.A., Tishkin N.S. Kliniko anatomicheskie sopostavleniya pri rake podzheludochnoj zhelezy. Klin. hir. 1988. Vol.11. P. 58-59. (in Russian)
Samoilenko V. M. Rak organov pankreatoduodenal'noj zony. PhD Dissertation (Medicine). Moscow 1990; 256: (in Russian)
Mieny M. Carcinoma of the pancreas: role of radical surgery // S. Afr. Cancer Bull. 1985. Vol. 29. № 1-2. P. 70-73.
Danilov M.V., Pomelov BC, Vishnevsky V., A., Buriev I.M., Vikhorev A.V., Kazanchyan P.O., Savvina T.V. Metodika pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii i total'noj duodenopankreatektomii. Hirurgiya. 1990. Vol. 10 P.94-108. (in Russian)
Veronovsky G.I. Shtofin S.G., Ivanov G.V., Popov A.I., i soavt. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie zlokachestvennyh opuholej golovki podzheludochnoj zhelezy i periampulyarnoj oblasti. Vestnik hirurgii, 1992. Vol. 6. P.288- 292. (in Russian)
Miedema B. W., Sarr M. G., van Heerden J. A. et al. Complications Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy //Arch. Surg. 1992. Vol. 127: Aug. P. 945-950.
Kubyshkin V.A., Vishnevsky V.A., Danilov M.V., Buriev I.M., Vukolov A. V. Ocenka metodov zaversheniya pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii. Hirurgiya. 2001. Vol.1. P. 46-50.P. 80 (in Russian)
Buyanov V.M., Egiev V. B, Rudakova M.N., Rusanov V.P. Tekhnika pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii i intraoperacionnaya profilaktika ostrogo pankreatita. Hirurgiya. 1996. Vol.2. P. 5-7 (in Russian)
Kuzin M.I., Danilov M.V., Blagovidov D.F. Hronicheskij pankreatit. Moscow: Medicina, 1985. 368 p. (in Russian)
Lapkin K.V., Bazilevich F.V., Malyarchuk V.I., Udotov O.A., Rusanov V.P., Antonov V.V. Precizionnaya tekhnika pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii. Hirurgiya. 1991. Vol.2. P. 104. (in Russian)
Reding R. Versorgung des Pankreasrests nach kephalen Resektion // M.Trede, H.D.Saeger. Aktuelle Pankreas-Chirurgie. Berlin: Springer, 1990. S.213-218.
Patyutko Yu.I., Klimenkov A.A., Itin A.B., Samoilenko V.M. Sposob gastropankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii. Hirurgiya. 1990.Vol. 2.P.133-135. (in Russian)
Seidov V.D., Abdullaev I.K. Naruzhnoe drenirovaniepankreaticheskogo protoka posle pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii. Hirurgiya. 1989. Vol. 7. P.134-135. (in Russian)
Danilov M.V., Pomelov BC, Vishnevsky V., A., Buriev I.M., Vikhorev A.V., Kazanchyan P.O., Savvina T.V. Metodika pankreatoduodenal'noj rezekcii i total'noj duodenopankreatektomii. Hirurgiya. 1990.
Thomas E. Clancy, Stanley W. Ashley, Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple operation),Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 14 (2005) 533–552.
Beger HG, Gansauge F, Schwarz M, et al. Pancreatic head resection: the risk for local and systemic complications in 1315 patients a monoinstitutional experience. Am J Surg 2007;194:S16 –9.)
G. Conzo, C. Gambardella, E. Tartaglia, V. Sciascia, C. Mauriello, S. Napolitano, et al., Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the management of pancreatic stump. Literature review, Int. J. Surg. 21 (2015) S4–S9.
Karim, Sherko Abdullah Molah, et al. "The outcomes and complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): Cross sectional study." International Journal of Surgery 52 (2018): 383-387.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017; 161: 584-591.
D'Cruz, Jason R., Subhasis Misra, and Shafeek Shamsudeen. "Pancreaticoduodenectomy." (2020).
S. Crippa, R. Salvia, M. Falconi, et al., Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery, HPB Oxf. 9 (1) (2007) 8e15.
Y. Yang, X. Tian, Y. Zhuang, et al., Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy, World J. Gastroenterol. 11 (16) (2005) 2456e2461.
Lyu, Yunxiao, et al. "Selection of pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: duct-to-mucosa anastomosis is not better than invagination anastomosis: a meta-analysis." Medicine 97.40 (2018).
Cao, Zhe, et al. "Is Invagination Anastomosis More Effective in Reducing Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula for Soft Pancreas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Under Novel Fistula Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Frontiers in Oncology 2020; 1637.
Shumkovski, Aleksandar, Ljubomir Ognjenovic, and Stojan Gjoshev. "Comparison Between Dunking (Invagination) Pancreaticojejunoanastomosis and Double Layer Duct to Mucosa Anastomosis After Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy-Whipple Procedure for Pancreatic Cephalic Carcinoma."prilozi 41.3 (2020): 39-47.
Hirono, Seiko, et al. "Modified Blumgart mattress suture versus conventional interrupted suture in pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy: randomized controlled trial." Annals of surgery 269.2 (2019): 243.
J. Winter, J. Cameron, K. Campbell, et al., Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial, J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10 (9) (2006) 1280 e1290.
M. Tani, M. Kawai, S. Hirono, et al., A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy, Am. J. Surg. 199 (6) (2010) 759e764.
Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006;244:1–7.
R. Poon, S. Fan, C. Lo, et al., External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to
reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodectomy: a prospective randomized trial, Ann. Surg. 246 (3) (2007) 425e435.
F. Motoi, S. Egawa, T. Rikiyama, et al., Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy, Br. Surg. 99 (4) (2012) 524e531.
Kawaida, Hiromichi, et al. "Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery."World journal of gastroenterology 25.28 (2019): 3722.
Ferencz, S., et al. "Innovations in pancreatic anastomosis technique during pancreatoduodenectomies." Langenbeck's archives of surgery 405.7 (2020): 1039-1044.
Patel K, Teta A, Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, DeVito P. External pancreatic duct stent reduces pancreatic fistula: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 827-832 PMID: 25003575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.06.008
Hong S, Wang H, Yang S, Yang K. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 1516-1525 PMID: 23568149 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2187-4.
Howard JM. Pancreatojejunostomy: leakage is a preventable complication of the Whipple resection. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:454 –7.
Jang, J Y., et al. "Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy." British Journal of Surgery 103.6 (2016): 668-675.
Kamoda Y, Fujino Y, Matsumoto I, Shinzeki M, Sakai T, Kuroda Y. Usefulness of performing a pancreaticojejunostomy with an internal stent after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Today 2008; 38: 524–528