K.İpek TÜZÜN, İRFAN ÇAĞLAR

Investigating the antecedents of organization identification

ÖZET: Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel güven, örgütsel kimlik ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmek ve örgütsel kimlik algılamasının, örgütsel güven aracılığıyla örgütsel özdeşleşmeye yol açtığını öneren bir model önerisi sunmaktır. 545 kamu ve özel sermayeli ticari banka çalışanları üzerinde görgül bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Araştırma modeli testi için yapısal eşitlik modeli ve LISREL8.30 (Jöreskog ve Sörbom, 1993) istatistik programı kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmaya göre algılanan örgütsel kimliğin özdeşleşme üzerinde doğrudan etkisi söz konusu değildir. Algılanan güvenin, algılanan örgütsel kimliğin çekiciliği ve özdeşleşme arasında aracı etki yaptığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türkiye

Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri üzerine bir araştırma

ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper is to precisely examine the relationship between the attractiveness of organizational identity and strength of identification, and how perceived trust underlines such a possible effect of identity attractiveness on organizational identification (OID). A total of 545 public and private bank employees attended the study. Participants completed measures of organizational identification, organizational trust, and attractiveness of perceived organizational identity. Structural equation modeling and LISREL8.30 (Jöreskog and Sörbom, 1993) was used to assess the research model. The findings show that the relationship between attractiveness of perceived organizational identity (APOI) and identification is mediated by trust, and identity attractiveness does not directly influence the identification strength.

Keywords:

Turkey,

PDF

___

References ALBERT, S., & WHETTEN, D. (1985). Organizational identity. L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol 7, pp.263-295.
ALDER, S.G., NOEL T.W. & AMBROSE M.L. (2006). Clarifying the effects of Internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust, Information and Management, vol 43, pp. 894-903.
ASHFORTH, B.E., & MAEL, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organizations, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, pp. 20-39.
AYCAN, Z. (2001). Human resource management in Turkey - Current issues and future challenges, International Journal of Manpower, vol. 22:3, pp. 252-259.
BALL, D.A., MCCULLOCH, W.H., FRANTZ, P.L., GERINGER, J.M., & MINOR, M.S. (2002). International Business: The Challenge of Global Competition, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill Irwin.
BHATTACHARYA, C.B. & SEN, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumer’s relationship with companies, Journal of Marketing, 67:2, pp.76-88.
BIES, R.J., & TRIP T.M. (1996). Beyond trust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & R.T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, London.
BUTLER, J.K. (1991). Towards Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust; Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory, Journal of Management, vol7, no. 3, pp. 643-63.
COLE, M.S. and BRUCH, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationship with turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol 7, pp. 585-605.
CONNAUGHTON, S.L., & DALY, J.A. (2004). Identification with leader, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol 9, no.2, pp. 89-103.
COOK, J. & WALL, T (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol 53, pp.39-52.
CREMER, D.D., & VAN KNIPPENBERG, D. (2005). Cooperation as a function of leader self sacrifice, trust and identification, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, vol 25, no.5, pp. 355-369.
CUMMINGS, L.L. & BROMILEY, P. (1996). The Organizational trust inventory (OTI). In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.). Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, London.
DE CREMER, D. VAN DIJKE, M. BOS A.E.R. (2006). Leader’s procedural justice affecting identification and trust, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, vol 27, no.7, pp. 554-565.
DUKERICH, J.M., GOLDEN, B., & SHORTELl, S.M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity and image on physician cooperative behavior, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol 47,no.3, pp. 507-533.
DUTTON, J., & DUKERICH, J. (1991). Keeping eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation, Academy of Management Journal, vol 34, pp. 517-554.
DUTTON, J., & PENNER, J.W. (1993). The importance of organizational identity for strategic agenda building. In J. Hendry & G. Johnson (Eds.), Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change, New York: Strategic Management Society, Wiley.
DUTTON, J., DUKERICH, J., & HARQUAIL, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and membership commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol 34, pp. 239-263.
ELSBACH, K., & KRAMER, R.M. (1996). Member responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering business week rankings, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol 41, pp. 442-476.
HATCH, M. & SCHULTZ, M. (2002). The Dynamics Of Organizational Identity, Human Relations, vol 55, no.8, pp. 989-1005.
HOSMER, L.T. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link between Organization Theory Philosophical Ethics, Academy Of Management Review, vol 20, no.2, pp. 379- 403
HUEMER, L. (2004). Balancing between stability and variety: Identity and trust trade-offs in networks, Industrial Marketing Management, vol 33, pp. 251-259.
HUFF, L., & KELLEY, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven nation study, Organization Science, Vol 14,no.1, pp. 81-91.
JONES, G.R. & GEORGE, J.M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork, Academy of Management Review, vol 23, no.3, pp. 531-546.
JÖRESKOG, K.G. & SÖRBOM, D. (1993). LISREL : User’s reference Guide, Chicago: Scientific International Software.
KRAMER, R.M. (1993). Cooperation and organizational identification. In J.K. Murnighan (Ed). Social Psychology in Organizations:. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp.144-1-269
KREINER, G.E., & ASHFORTH, B.E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol 25, no.1, pp. 1-27.
LEE, H. (2004). The role of competence based trust and organizational identification in continuous improvement, Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol 19, no.6, pp.623-639.
MAEL, F., & ASHFORTH B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal Of Organizational Behavior Vol 13, pp. 103-123.
MAEL, F., & ASHFORTH B.E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers, Personnel Psychology, vol 48, pp. 309-333.
MAYER, R., DAVIS, J.H., & SCHOORMAN, F.D. (1995). Integration model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, vol 20, no.3, pp. 709-734.
MCALLISTER, D. (1995). Affect and cognition based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organization, Academy Of Management Journal, vol 38, no.1, pp. 24-59