Ahmet ŞEN, Pınar DUMAN AYDIN, Seyhan Sümeyra AŞCI, Seyfi KARTAL, Esra KONGUR, Hasan Rıza AYDIN

Yaşlı Hastalardaki Spinal Anestezide Median ve Paramedian Yaklaşımın Değerlendirilmesi

Giriş: Spinal anestezik pek çok cerrahi işlemde sıklıkla kullanılır. Spinal anestezide median ve paramedian yaklaşım kullanılmasına rağmen, geleneksel median yöntem daha çok tercih edilir. Spinal anestezideki paramedian yaklaşım yaşlılardaki dejeneratif değişikliklerden daha az etkilenmektedir. Bu çalışmada yaşlılarda iki yöntemden hangisinin üstün olduğunu değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktayız. Yöntemler: Bu çalişmada hastalara uygun hazırlık sonrası median ve paramedian yaklaşım ile spinal anestezik uygulandı. Bulgular: Çalişmaya toplam 103 hasta dahil edildi. Başarı oranı paramedian yaklaşımda %90,5 iken median yaklaşımda %79,1 olarak bulundu. İşlem süresi paramedian yaklaşımda median yaklaşımdan daha kısa idi (14.4±8.2’e karşın 28.4±24.9, p=0.004). İşlem esnasında spinal kemiklere değme ve başarısızlık nedeniyle başka aralıktan deneme istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde olmasa da median yaklaşımda daha fazla idi. İşlem süresi 30 sn den az olanların yaş ortalaması, 30 sn den fazla olanlara göre daha yüksek idi. Sonuç: Yaşlı hastalarda paramedian yaklaşımda, ilk girişimde ve tekrarlayan denemelerdeki başarı oranı yüksek, işlem süresi kısa, fleksiyon pozisyonundan bağımsız olarak spinal kemiklere değmeden hasta için daha konforlu şekilde işlem yapılabilmektedir. Bu nedenle yaşlı hastalarda median yaklaşıma göre paramedian yaklaşım hızlı, güvenli ve daha başarılı şekilde uygulanabilen bir yöntem olduğu kanısındayız.

Evaluation Of The Median And Paramedian Approach In Spinal Anesthesia In Elderly Patients

Objective: Spinal anesthesia is frequently used in many surgical procedures. Although both median and paramedianapproaches are used in spinal anesthesia, the conventional median approach is preferred. Reportedly, degenerativechanges in elderly patients are less affected by the paramedian approach during spinal anesthesia. In this study, we aimto determine which of the two methods is superior in elderly patients.Method: This study, patients were treated with the median approach or paramedian approach during spinal anesthesiaafter appropriate procedural preparation.Results: Overall, 103 patients were included in the study. The success rate was 90.5% in the paramedian approach and79.1% in the median approach. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the paramedian approach than in the medianapproach (14.4 ± 8.2 versus 28.4 ± 24.9, p = 0.004). During the procedure, the repetition from another interval was morein the median approach than in the statistically insignificant level due to the contact with the spinal bones and failure.The average age of the patients with the procedure duration was

PDF

___

1. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA. Royal college of anaesthetists third national audit project. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the third national audit project of the royal college of anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179-90.
2. Firdous T, Siddiqui MA, Siddiqui SM. Frequency of post dural puncture headache in patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia with median versus paramedian approach. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care 2016; 20: 165-70.
3. Puolakka R, Haasio J, Pitkänen MT, et al. Technical aspects and postoperative sequelae of spinal and epidural anesthesia: a prospective study of 3,230 orthopedic patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 488-97.
4. Conroy PH, Luyet C, McCartney CJ, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study of a new approach. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2013; 2013: 525818.
5. S Kartal, B Kösem, H Kılınç, et al. Comparison of epidrum, epi-jet and loss of resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20: 992- 7.
6. Wantman A, Hancox N, Howell PR. Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 370 –5.
7. Ali SM, Dash S, Mohapatra R. Spinal anaesthesia with median and paramedian approach in geriatric patients undergoing lower limb surgery IJMAS 2016; 3:130-5.
8. Rabinowitz A, Bourdet B, Minville V, et al. The paramedian technique: a superior initial approach to continuous spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1855-7.
9. Singh P, Agrawal SK, Dwivedi S, et al. A comparative evaluation between median and paramedian approaches for sub-arachnoid block in elderly patients. Int J Res Med Sci 2016; 4: 2069-72.
10. Bayındır S, Özcan S, Koçyiğit F, et al. Which approach is preferred in spinal anesthesia: median or paramedian? Comparison of early and late complications. İstanbul Med J 2017; 18: 205-9.
11. Ahsan-ul-Haq M, Amin S, Javaid S. Paramedian technique of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients for hip fracture surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005; 15: 160–1.
12. Muranaka K, Mizutani H, Seo K, et al. A comparison between midline and para median approaches for combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Masui 2001; 50: 1085-8.
13. Podder S, Kumar N, Yaddanapudi LN, et al. Paramedian lumbar epidural catheter insertion with patients in the sitting position is equally successful in the flexed and unflexed spine. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1829 –32.
14. Haider S, Butt KJ, Aziz M, et al. Post dural puncture headache-a comparison of midline and paramedian approaches. Biomedica 2005; 21: 90-2.
15. Mosaffa F, Karimi K, Madadi F, et al. Post-dural puncture headache: a comparison between median and paramedian approaches in orthopedic patients. Anesth Pain Med 2011; 1: 66–69.
16. Sadeghi A, Razavi SS, Gachkar L, et al. Comparison of the incidence of post spinal headache following median and para median approach in cesarean patients. J Iranian Soc. Anesthesiol Intens Care 2009; 31: 4-9.
17. Türker G, Gurbet A, Kelebek Girgin N, et al. Dura delinmesine bağlı başağrısı: Median ve paramedian yaklaşımların karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der 2005; 33: 139.